Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Jan 14, 2021·STAPLES Center, Los Angeles

Minnesota Wild 4, Los Angeles Kings 3 (OT)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Los Angeles Kings win this game 50% of the time.

LAK winsMIN wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTTotal
MIN160122712427
LAK1721401201334

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 16:06MINJonas BrodinAssists: Kirill Kaprizov, Greg Pateryn · Wrist, 0.04 xG1–0
  2. P1 19:57LAKJeff CarterAssists: Anze Kopitar · Backhand, 0.31 xG1–1
  3. P2 7:12LAKAndreas AthanasiouAssists: Jeff Carter, Matt Roy · Wrist, 0.44 xG1–2
  4. P2 17:05LAKDustin BrownPPAssists: Alex Iafallo, Anze Kopitar · Wrist, 0.08 xG1–3
  5. P3 3:15MINVictor RaskAssists: Kirill Kaprizov, Mathew Dumba · Wrist, 0.07 xG2–3
  6. P3 9:42MINMarcus FolignoAssists: Ryan Suter · Snap, 0.18 xG3–3
  7. OT 3:47MINKirill KaprizovGWGUnassisted · Deflected, 0.22 xG4–3
Penalties (10)
  1. P1 1:17MINMathew Dumba: High sticking2 min
  2. P2 1:42LAKMark Alt: Slashing2 min
  3. P2 5:33LAKKale Clague: Hooking2 min
  4. P2 6:09MINKevin Fiala: Interference goalkeeper2 min
  5. P2 7:36LAKDustin Brown: Holding2 min
  6. P2 10:24LAKMatt Luff: Too many men on the ice2 min
  7. P2 15:11MINJonas Brodin: Holding2 min · PPG
  8. P2 18:32LAKBlake Lizotte: Tripping2 min
  9. P3 5:38MINMarcus Johansson: Slashing2 min
  10. P3 19:00LAKOlli Maatta: Holding2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

MIN00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0LAK
46% to win54% to win
← MIN attackLAK attack →
  1. P1 20:00Lizotte won the faceoff against Bonino
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

MINLAK
27Shots on goal34
3.1Expected goals3.2
51Shot attempts52
24Faceoffs won38
6Power plays4
8Penalty minutes12
22Hits18
7Blocked shots12
2Giveaways8
1Takeaways3

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against. Shift data for this game is incomplete, so treat these as rough.

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. bestFoligno – Greenway – Eriksson Ek7:51

    xG 0.83–0.25 (76%)attempts 8–7goals 1–0

  2. Parise – Bjugstad – Kaprizov6:29

    xG 0.30–0.23 (56%)attempts 6–3goals 1–0

  3. Rask – Hartman – Sturm4:59

    xG 0.06–0.10 (39%)attempts 2–5goals 0–0

  4. Parise – Rask – Kaprizov3:42

    xG 0.07–0.32 (18%)attempts 3–6goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestSuter – Dumba12:55

    xG 1.09–0.55 (66%)attempts 14–8goals 2–1

  2. Suter – Brodin3:02

    xG 0.01–0.11 (6%)attempts 1–3goals 0–0

  3. Spurgeon – Brodin15:07

    xG 0.19–0.43 (31%)attempts 9–9goals 1–0

Los Angeles Kings

Forward lines

  1. bestAmadio – Luff – Moore6:24

    xG 0.38–0.17 (69%)attempts 6–4goals 0–0

  2. Brown – Kopitar – Iafallo11:25

    xG 0.34–0.39 (46%)attempts 9–8goals 0–0

  3. Carter – Athanasiou – Lizotte9:20

    xG 0.00–0.06 (1%)attempts 2–4goals 0–1

  4. Kempe – Wagner – Vilardi7:12

    xG 0.31–0.56 (36%)attempts 7–5goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestAlt – Clague9:19

    xG 0.39–0.05 (89%)attempts 10–4goals 0–0

  2. Roy – Anderson15:17

    xG 0.71–0.38 (65%)attempts 11–8goals 1–1

  3. Doughty – Maatta16:21

    xG 0.47–1.02 (31%)attempts 10–16goals 0–2

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

LAK 3.2 xGMIN 3.1 xG
0123P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

LAKMIN

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

LAK's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line LAK is favoured, below it MIN. Dots are goals.

Excitement 90/100 · #91 of 868 this seasonSwing 2.26 · 7 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 7% (winner's lowest chance)
MIN 100%5050%50LAK 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +30 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Los Angeles Kings win this game 50% of the time.

LAK winsMIN wins

Simulated goal difference (LAK − MIN), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).