Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Jan 16, 2021·STAPLES Center, Los Angeles

Minnesota Wild 4, Los Angeles Kings 3 (OT)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 57% of the time.

LAK winsMIN wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTTotal
MIN11401221513444
LAK1112130702333

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 0:21MINMathew DumbaAssists: Jordan Greenway, Ryan Suter · Wrist, 0.11 xG1–0
  2. P1 16:58LAKGabriel VilardiAssists: Austin Wagner, Kurtis MacDermid · Wrist, 0.66 xG1–1
  3. P2 7:02LAKBlake LizotteAssists: Drew Doughty, Jeff Carter · Deflected, 0.05 xG1–2
  4. P2 10:22LAKAndreas AthanasiouAssists: Jeff Carter · Wrist, 0.45 xG1–3
  5. P3 7:38MINJoel Eriksson EkAssists: Jordan Greenway, Greg Pateryn · Wrist, 0.31 xG2–3
  6. P3 19:58MINMathew DumbaAssists: Ryan Suter · Deflected, 0.07 xG3–3
  7. OT 4:49MINMarcus JohanssonGWGAssists: Kirill Kaprizov, Jonas Brodin · Wrist, 0.06 xG4–3
Penalties (12)
  1. P1 5:46LAKAndreas Athanasiou: Too many men on the ice2 min
  2. P1 6:51MINNick Bjugstad: Hooking2 min
  3. P1 13:17MINMarcus Johansson: Interference2 min
  4. P2 1:51LAKJeff Carter: Interference2 min
  5. P2 9:40LAKGabriel Vilardi: Slashing2 min
  6. P2 9:40MINKevin Fiala: Interference2 min
  7. P2 11:49LAKAdrian Kempe: Holding2 min
  8. P2 12:24MINKirill Kaprizov: Slashing2 min
  9. P2 16:32LAKSean Walker: Holding2 min
  10. P3 1:35MINKevin Fiala: High sticking2 min
  11. P3 4:47LAKDrew Doughty: Interference2 min
  12. P3 8:44MINZach Parise: Holding2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

MIN00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0LAK
46% to win54% to win
← MIN attackLAK attack →
  1. P1 20:00Vilardi won the faceoff against Eriksson Ek
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

MINLAK
44Shots on goal33
4.0Expected goals3.6
73Shot attempts52
36Faceoffs won30
5Power plays5
12Penalty minutes12
17Hits18
8Blocked shots14
3Giveaways16
0Takeaways2

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. bestBonino – Johansson – Fiala4:16

    xG 0.43–0.06 (88%)attempts 8–4goals 0–0

  2. Foligno – Greenway – Eriksson Ek9:31

    xG 0.37–0.26 (59%)attempts 9–8goals 1–0

  3. Bjugstad – Hartman – Sturm2:47

    xG 0.10–0.05 (66%)attempts 3–4goals 0–0

  4. Parise – Rask – Kaprizov4:45

    xG 0.05–0.05 (46%)attempts 7–2goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestPateryn – Soucy7:18

    xG 0.53–0.15 (78%)attempts 7–5goals 1–0

  2. Spurgeon – Brodin14:37

    xG 0.48–0.21 (69%)attempts 15–12goals 0–1

  3. Suter – Dumba12:56

    xG 0.91–1.12 (45%)attempts 21–13goals 1–1

Los Angeles Kings

Forward lines

  1. bestKempe – Wagner – Vilardi3:10

    xG 0.11–0.00 (100%)attempts 5–3goals 0–0

  2. Amadio – Luff – Moore4:42

    xG 0.20–0.21 (49%)attempts 7–4goals 0–0

  3. Carter – Athanasiou – Lizotte6:45

    xG 0.05–0.21 (20%)attempts 2–11goals 1–0

  4. Brown – Kopitar – Iafallo8:25

    xG 0.10–0.41 (19%)attempts 4–10goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestDoughty – Maatta11:33

    xG 0.38–0.03 (92%)attempts 13–3goals 1–0

  2. Roy – Anderson10:56

    xG 0.20–0.78 (20%)attempts 9–22goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

LAK 3.6 xGMIN 4.0 xG
01234P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

LAKMIN

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

LAK's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line LAK is favoured, below it MIN. Dots are goals.

Excitement 90/100 · #88 of 868 this seasonSwing 2.28 · 7 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 3% (winner's lowest chance)
MIN 100%5050%50LAK 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +44 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 57% of the time.

LAK winsMIN wins

Simulated goal difference (LAK − MIN), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).