Tue, Jan 19, 2021·Wells Fargo Center, Philadelphia
Buffalo Sabres 0, Philadelphia Flyers 3
Expected result
Based on shot quality alone, Buffalo Sabres win this game 65% of the time.
By period
Goals and shots on goal in each period.
| Team | P1 | P2 | P3 | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BUF | 011 | 013 | 016 | 040 |
| PHI | 011 | 19 | 210 | 330 |
Goals, with shots on goal in grey.
Scoring
Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.
- P2 17:51PHITravis KonecnyGWGAssists: Oskar Lindblom, Nolan Patrick · Backhand, 0.15 xG0–1
- P3 13:43PHIJakub VoracekAssists: Kevin Hayes, Erik Gustafsson · Wrist, 0.06 xG0–2
- P3 18:18PHIKevin HayesENUnassisted · Wrist, 0.49 xG0–3
Penalties (5)
- P1 2:40PHIRobert Hagg: Interference2 min
- P1 3:41PHIMichael Raffl: High sticking2 min
- P1 9:07BUFJeff Skinner: Tripping2 min
- P2 10:35PHIJakub Voracek: Tripping2 min
- P2 19:58BUFRasmus Ristolainen: Roughing2 min
Replay
Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.
20:00
P1
- P1 20:00Laughton won the faceoff against Eichel
- Goal
- Shot
- Miss
- Block
- Hit
- Takeaway
- Giveaway
- Faceoff
- Penalty
The numbers
Team totals, side by side.
Line combinations that worked
Model-basedEach team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.
Buffalo Sabres
Forward lines
- bestHall – Reinhart – Eichel14:45
xG 0.95–0.46 (68%)attempts 20–10goals 0–1
- Eakin – Rieder – Asplund7:03
xG 0.43–0.11 (79%)attempts 9–5goals 0–0
- Staal – Skinner – Olofsson4:40
xG 0.21–0.07 (75%)attempts 5–3goals 0–0
- Staal – Olofsson – Cozens7:06
xG 0.19–0.34 (36%)attempts 5–7goals 0–0
Defence pairs
- bestRistolainen – Montour4:00
xG 0.31–0.04 (89%)attempts 4–2goals 0–0
- Montour – Jokiharju11:28
xG 0.49–0.36 (58%)attempts 13–9goals 0–0
- Miller – Jokiharju3:59
xG 0.16–0.05 (75%)attempts 2–4goals 0–0
Philadelphia Flyers
Forward lines
- bestGiroux – van Riemsdyk – Frost6:56
xG 0.49–0.00 (100%)attempts 8–3goals 0–0
- Laughton – Raffl – Aube-Kubel8:45
xG 0.17–0.35 (33%)attempts 3–10goals 0–0
- Voracek – Hayes – Farabee8:46
xG 0.30–0.49 (38%)attempts 8–13goals 1–0
- Giroux – van Riemsdyk – Voracek3:55
xG 0.10–0.33 (24%)attempts 3–5goals 0–0
Defence pairs
- Sanheim – Provorov14:46
xG 0.44–0.43 (50%)attempts 11–16goals 0–0
- Braun – Provorov2:32
xG 0.17–0.23 (43%)attempts 3–3goals 1–0
- Gustafsson – Provorov3:26
xG 0.02–0.07 (20%)attempts 1–3goals 0–0
How the game flowed
Model-basedChance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.
Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.
Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute
Win probability
Model-basedHow each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.
PHI's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line PHI is favoured, below it BUF. Dots are goals.
Did the better team win?
Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.
Based on shot quality alone, Buffalo Sabres win this game 65% of the time.
Simulated goal difference (PHI − BUF), 10,000 replays
The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).