Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Jan 30, 2021·Amalie Arena, Tampa

Nashville Predators 3, Tampa Bay Lightning 4

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Tampa Bay Lightning win this game 55% of the time.

TBL winsNSH wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
NSH1601129326
TBL08415010433

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 17:55NSHRyan EllisPPAssists: Nick Cousins, Filip Forsberg · Wrist, 0.43 xG1–0
  2. P2 3:33TBLTyler JohnsonPPAssists: Anthony Cirelli, Mikhail Sergachev · Wrist, 0.21 xG1–1
  3. P2 6:41TBLCal FooteAssists: Mikhail Sergachev, Brayden Point · Slap, 0.04 xG1–2
  4. P2 8:05TBLVictor HedmanAssists: Anthony Cirelli, Alex Killorn · Wrist, 0.03 xG1–3
  5. P2 17:27TBLSteven StamkosPPGWGAssists: Victor Hedman, Brayden Point · Slap, 0.07 xG1–4
  6. P3 7:00NSHMathieu OlivierPPAssists: Ryan Johansen, Roman Josi · Backhand, 0.19 xG2–4
  7. P3 18:26NSHViktor ArvidssonAssists: Mikael Granlund, Filip Forsberg · Wrist, 0.10 xG3–4
Penalties (18)
  1. P1 8:10NSHColton Sissons: Hooking2 min
  2. P1 11:01TBLSteven Stamkos: Slashing2 min
  3. P1 12:16TBLAnthony Cirelli: Slashing2 min
  4. P1 17:47TBLRyan McDonagh: Interference2 min · PPG
  5. P1 19:21NSHDante Fabbro: Roughing2 min
  6. P2 1:41NSHMark Borowiecki: Hooking2 min · PPG
  7. P2 12:26TBLMikhail Sergachev: Cross checking2 min
  8. P2 17:14NSHViktor Arvidsson: Holding2 min · PPG
  9. P2 17:33TBLPatrick Maroon: Fighting5 min
  10. P2 17:33NSHMark Borowiecki: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  11. P2 17:33NSHMark Borowiecki: Fighting5 min
  12. P2 19:20NSHMatt Benning: Roughing2 min
  13. P3 5:11TBLBarclay Goodrow: High sticking2 min · PPG
  14. P3 10:19NSHDante Fabbro: Fighting5 min
  15. P3 10:19TBLYanni Gourde: Fighting5 min
  16. P3 13:27NSHMathieu Olivier: Roughing2 min
  17. P3 15:33TBLPatrick Maroon: Misconduct10 min
  18. P3 15:33NSHMark Borowiecki: Misconduct10 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

NSH00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0TBL
46% to win54% to win
← NSH attackTBL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Point won the faceoff against Richardson
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

NSHTBL
26Shots on goal33
2.2Expected goals2.5
39Shot attempts54
21Faceoffs won34
5Power plays7
34Penalty minutes30
17Hits21
11Blocked shots11
0Giveaways2
0Takeaways3

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against. Shift data for this game is incomplete, so treat these as rough.

Nashville Predators

Forward lines

  1. bestDuchene – Granlund – Cousins6:49

    xG 0.41–0.05 (89%)attempts 5–3goals 0–1

  2. Haula – Trenin – Olivier2:44

    xG 0.02–0.10 (17%)attempts 2–3goals 0–1

  3. Johansen – Forsberg – Arvidsson4:26

    xG 0.00–0.13 (0%)attempts 0–5goals 0–0

  4. Haula – Sissons – Kunin7:31

    xG 0.03–0.16 (14%)attempts 3–3goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestBorowiecki – Benning5:43

    xG 0.58–0.09 (87%)attempts 5–4goals 0–0

  2. Ellis – Ekholm3:07

    xG 0.09–0.00 (100%)attempts 2–0goals 0–0

  3. Josi – Benning2:13

    xG 0.12–0.03 (81%)attempts 2–2goals 0–1

Tampa Bay Lightning

Forward lines

  1. bestColeman – Goodrow – Gourde8:31

    xG 0.32–0.20 (61%)attempts 7–3goals 0–0

  2. Maroon – Joseph – Volkov5:34

    xG 0.14–0.03 (84%)attempts 2–2goals 0–0

  3. Killorn – Johnson – Cirelli9:51

    xG 0.08–0.00 (100%)attempts 6–2goals 1–0

  4. Stamkos – Palat – Point10:03

    xG 0.15–0.60 (19%)attempts 6–8goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestMcDonagh – Sergachev2:32

    xG 0.25–0.03 (88%)attempts 4–3goals 0–0

  2. McDonagh – Schenn8:00

    xG 0.11–0.15 (42%)attempts 4–3goals 0–0

  3. Hedman – Sergachev2:07

    xG 0.01–0.06 (14%)attempts 1–3goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

TBL 2.5 xGNSH 2.2 xG
00.511.522.5P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

TBLNSH

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

TBL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line TBL is favoured, below it NSH. Dots are goals.

Excitement 69/100 · #253 of 868 this seasonSwing 1.24 · 7 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 32% (winner's lowest chance)
NSH 100%5050%50TBL 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +22 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Tampa Bay Lightning win this game 55% of the time.

TBL winsNSH wins

Simulated goal difference (TBL − NSH), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).