Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Jan 30, 2021·Xcel Energy Center, St. Paul

Colorado Avalanche 5, Minnesota Wild 1

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Colorado Avalanche win this game 68% of the time.

MIN winsCOL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
COL21411227533
MIN1601004120

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 3:02COLLogan O'ConnorAssists: Samuel Girard, Cale Makar · Wrist, 0.02 xG1–0
  2. P1 6:49MINMathew DumbaAssists: Jonas Brodin, Jordan Greenway · Wrist, 0.04 xG1–1
  3. P1 19:43COLJoonas DonskoiPPGWGAssists: Brandon Saad, Andre Burakovsky · Wrist, 0.16 xG2–1
  4. P2 3:07COLMikko RantanenAssists: Nathan MacKinnon, Gabriel Landeskog · Wrist, 0.02 xG3–1
  5. P3 12:17COLBrandon SaadAssists: Nathan MacKinnon, Mikko Rantanen · Wrist, 0.16 xG4–1
  6. P3 14:55COLJ.T. CompherPPAssists: Andre Burakovsky, Samuel Girard · Wrist, 0.13 xG5–1
Penalties (8)
  1. P1 17:57MINRyan Suter: Tripping2 min · PPG
  2. P2 6:24COLNathan MacKinnon: Tripping2 min
  3. P2 10:18MINCarson Soucy: Hooking2 min
  4. P2 15:57MINCarson Soucy: Cross checking double minor4 min
  5. P3 3:36MINJordan Greenway: Hooking2 min
  6. P3 6:54COLGabriel Landeskog: Slashing2 min
  7. P3 13:25MINZach Parise: Tripping2 min · PPG
  8. P3 18:51MINRyan Hartman: Slashing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

COL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0MIN
46% to win54% to win
← COL attackMIN attack →
  1. P1 20:00MacKinnon won the faceoff against Sturm
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

COLMIN
33Shots on goal20
2.4Expected goals1.6
62Shot attempts33
31Faceoffs won34
7Power plays2
4Penalty minutes14
5Hits21
4Blocked shots18
3Giveaways2
5Takeaways7

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against. Shift data for this game is incomplete, so treat these as rough.

Colorado Avalanche

Forward lines

  1. bestJost – Sherwood – O'Connor8:15

    xG 0.29–0.16 (65%)attempts 12–3goals 1–0

  2. Kadri – Saad – Burakovsky8:25

    xG 0.24–0.16 (61%)attempts 10–5goals 0–0

  3. Landeskog – MacKinnon – Rantanen12:48

    xG 0.20–0.12 (63%)attempts 13–7goals 1–1

  4. Donskoi – Compher – Nichushkin6:35

    xG 0.17–0.11 (60%)attempts 3–2goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestGirard – Makar8:09

    xG 0.37–0.08 (81%)attempts 12–5goals 2–1

  2. Graves – Girard2:45

    xG 0.13–0.00 (96%)attempts 3–2goals 0–0

  3. Graves – Timmins9:34

    xG 0.19–0.10 (66%)attempts 8–3goals 0–0

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. bestFoligno – Greenway – Eriksson Ek3:26

    xG 0.35–0.20 (63%)attempts 3–5goals 0–1

  2. Johansson – Eriksson Ek – Kaprizov5:14

    xG 0.12–0.11 (52%)attempts 5–2goals 0–0

  3. Parise – Bjugstad – Hartman3:34

    xG 0.00–0.00 (0%)attempts 0–2goals 0–0

  4. Foligno – Greenway – Sturm8:15

    xG 0.09–0.21 (30%)attempts 5–12goals 1–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestSuter – Spurgeon11:04

    xG 0.20–0.15 (57%)attempts 8–7goals 0–0

  2. Brodin – Dumba13:27

    xG 0.48–0.64 (43%)attempts 10–20goals 1–2

  3. Cole – Soucy12:32

    xG 0.12–0.40 (23%)attempts 3–17goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

MIN 1.6 xGCOL 2.4 xG
00.511.522.5P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

MINCOL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

MIN's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line MIN is favoured, below it COL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 29/100 · #585 of 868 this seasonSwing 0.98 · 5 goals in reachComeback index 46% (winner's lowest chance)
COL 100%5050%50MIN 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +20 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Colorado Avalanche win this game 68% of the time.

MIN winsCOL wins

Simulated goal difference (MIN − COL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).