Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sun, Jan 31, 2021·Xcel Energy Center, St. Paul

Colorado Avalanche 3, Minnesota Wild 4 (OT)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 64% of the time.

MIN winsCOL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTTotal
COL181711000325
MIN11011111111433

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 4:33COLJoonas DonskoiAssists: Nathan MacKinnon, Gabriel Landeskog · Wrist, 0.10 xG1–0
  2. P1 16:19MINJordan GreenwayAssists: Joel Eriksson Ek, Ryan Hartman · Wrist, 0.12 xG1–1
  3. P2 1:28MINVictor RaskAssists: Jared Spurgeon, Ryan Suter · Wrist, 0.04 xG1–2
  4. P2 3:31COLCale MakarAssists: Nathan MacKinnon, Samuel Girard · Wrist, 0.04 xG2–2
  5. P3 7:09COLBrandon SaadAssists: Nazem Kadri · Wrist, 0.08 xG3–2
  6. P3 12:34MINVictor RaskAssists: Kirill Kaprizov · Wrist, 0.06 xG3–3
  7. OT 0:18MINJonas BrodinGWGAssists: Jordan Greenway, Joel Eriksson Ek · Slap, 0.11 xG3–4
Penalties (7)
  1. P1 8:49MINNico Sturm: Tripping2 min
  2. P1 16:52COLSamuel Girard: Hooking2 min
  3. P2 4:48COLBowen Byram: Tripping2 min
  4. P2 10:37MINNick Bonino: Tripping2 min
  5. P3 2:40MINJonas Brodin: Hooking2 min
  6. P3 7:48MINNico Sturm: Holding2 min
  7. P3 12:55COLBowen Byram: Hooking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

COL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0MIN
46% to win54% to win
← COL attackMIN attack →
  1. P1 20:00Landeskog won the faceoff against Eriksson Ek
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

COLMIN
25Shots on goal33
1.7Expected goals2.4
53Shot attempts51
31Faceoffs won35
4Power plays3
6Penalty minutes8
9Hits14
8Blocked shots14
0Giveaways5
2Takeaways3

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Colorado Avalanche

Forward lines

  1. Kadri – Landeskog – Rantanen3:39

    xG 0.06–0.04 (61%)attempts 2–2goals 0–0

  2. Nichushkin – Jost – O'Connor2:22

    xG 0.15–0.14 (52%)attempts 4–2goals 0–0

  3. Kadri – Saad – Burakovsky6:45

    xG 0.21–0.23 (47%)attempts 7–5goals 0–1

  4. Landeskog – MacKinnon – Rantanen10:00

    xG 0.22–0.33 (40%)attempts 12–7goals 1–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestMakar – Byram9:26

    xG 0.44–0.28 (61%)attempts 11–6goals 1–1

  2. Graves – Timmins2:02

    xG 0.23–0.11 (68%)attempts 4–2goals 0–0

  3. MacDonald – Makar5:29

    xG 0.26–0.14 (65%)attempts 11–2goals 0–0

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. Rask – Kaprizov – Sturm6:08

    xG 0.26–0.22 (54%)attempts 4–4goals 0–1

  2. Hartman – Greenway – Eriksson Ek13:43

    xG 0.36–0.34 (51%)attempts 10–11goals 1–1

  3. Bonino – Rau – Mayhew4:22

    xG 0.03–0.20 (13%)attempts 3–5goals 0–0

  4. Parise – Bjugstad – Johnson5:55

    xG 0.10–0.28 (26%)attempts 2–11goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestBrodin – Soucy12:19

    xG 0.47–0.26 (65%)attempts 10–10goals 1–1

  2. Suter – Spurgeon14:39

    xG 0.55–0.52 (51%)attempts 17–11goals 2–2

  3. Cole – Brodin2:35

    xG 0.01–0.05 (20%)attempts 2–2goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

MIN 2.4 xGCOL 1.7 xG
00.511.522.5P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

MINCOL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

MIN's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line MIN is favoured, below it COL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 91/100 · #74 of 868 this seasonSwing 2.50 · 7 goals in reachComeback index 16% (winner's lowest chance)
COL 100%5050%50MIN 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +37 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 64% of the time.

MIN winsCOL wins

Simulated goal difference (MIN − COL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).