Skip to content
Ice Lab

Mon, Feb 1, 2021·Madison Square Garden, New York

Pittsburgh Penguins 1, New York Rangers 3

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, New York Rangers win this game 59% of the time.

NYR winsPIT wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
PIT1120509126
NYR091629324

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 9:05PITJason ZuckerAssists: Chad Ruhwedel, Evgeni Malkin · Wrist, 0.29 xG1–0
  2. P2 17:42NYRKevin RooneyAssists: Artemi Panarin, Ryan Lindgren · Wrist, 0.25 xG1–1
  3. P3 11:10NYRChris KreiderPPGWGAssists: Adam Fox, Artemi Panarin · Tip-in, 0.15 xG1–2
  4. P3 19:59NYRArtemi PanarinENAssists: Ryan Strome · Wrist, 0.67 xG1–3
Penalties (12)
  1. P1 2:52PITJake Guentzel: Slashing2 min
  2. P1 12:23NYRJonny Brodzinski: Hooking2 min
  3. P1 18:49NYRJacob Trouba: Slashing2 min
  4. P1 0:00NYRBrett Howden: Fighting5 min
  5. P1 0:00PITKasperi Kapanen: Fighting5 min
  6. P2 2:34PITSam Lafferty: High sticking2 min
  7. P2 5:36NYRAnthony Bitetto: Interference2 min
  8. P2 13:38NYRK'Andre Miller: Tripping2 min
  9. P2 19:03NYRRyan Lindgren: Tripping2 min
  10. P3 3:49PITChad Ruhwedel: Slashing2 min
  11. P3 10:57PITChad Ruhwedel: Delaying game puck over glass2 min · PPG
  12. P3 14:25NYRJulien Gauthier: Holding2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

PIT00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0NYR
46% to win54% to win
← PIT attackNYR attack →
  1. P1 20:00Zibanejad won the faceoff against Crosby
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

PITNYR
26Shots on goal24
2.5Expected goals3.0
60Shot attempts46
34Faceoffs won14
6Power plays4
13Penalty minutes17
25Hits26
13Blocked shots20
8Giveaways8
5Takeaways7

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against. Shift data for this game is incomplete, so treat these as rough.

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. bestMalkin – Zucker – Kapanen8:45

    xG 0.36–0.06 (85%)attempts 6–4goals 1–0

  2. Blueger – McCann – Tanev4:37

    xG 0.29–0.02 (93%)attempts 8–1goals 0–0

  3. Crosby – Rust – Guentzel8:40

    xG 0.05–0.22 (18%)attempts 6–6goals 0–0

  4. Jankowski – Lafferty – O'Connor4:15

    xG 0.03–0.31 (10%)attempts 5–5goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestRuhwedel – Marino2:03

    xG 0.36–0.06 (87%)attempts 3–1goals 1–0

  2. Ceci – Ruhwedel7:41

    xG 0.26–0.10 (72%)attempts 11–5goals 0–0

  3. Weber – Czuczman7:01

    xG 0.00–0.03 (8%)attempts 2–5goals 0–0

New York Rangers

Forward lines

  1. bestStrome – Panarin – Lafrenière2:22

    xG 0.29–0.04 (87%)attempts 2–1goals 0–0

  2. Zibanejad – Buchnevich – Lafrenière3:50

    xG 0.15–0.00 (100%)attempts 3–1goals 0–0

  3. Kreider – Zibanejad – Buchnevich4:06

    xG 0.12–0.00 (100%)attempts 2–0goals 0–0

  4. Di Giuseppe – Gauthier – Howden3:31

    xG 0.09–0.09 (50%)attempts 5–6goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestBitetto – Trouba3:17

    xG 0.29–0.00 (100%)attempts 3–3goals 0–0

  2. Bitetto – Lindgren4:32

    xG 0.07–0.03 (68%)attempts 3–3goals 0–0

  3. Fox – Miller3:16

    xG 0.07–0.07 (51%)attempts 4–3goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

NYR 3.0 xGPIT 2.5 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

NYRPIT

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

NYR's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line NYR is favoured, below it PIT. Dots are goals.

Excitement 40/100 · #497 of 868 this seasonSwing 1.38 · 4 goals in reachComeback index 26% (winner's lowest chance)
PIT 100%5050%50NYR 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +27 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, New York Rangers win this game 59% of the time.

NYR winsPIT wins

Simulated goal difference (NYR − PIT), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).