Skip to content
Ice Lab

Wed, Feb 3, 2021·Wells Fargo Center, Philadelphia

Boston Bruins 4, Philadelphia Flyers 3 (OT)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Boston Bruins win this game 67% of the time.

PHI winsBOS wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTTotal
BOS1801321212435
PHI081112600325

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 0:12BOSDavid PastrnakAssists: Charlie McAvoy, Patrice Bergeron · Wrist, 0.12 xG1–0
  2. P2 15:29PHIKevin HayesAssists: Travis Sanheim, Philippe Myers · Slap, 0.08 xG1–1
  3. P3 1:03PHIJakub VoracekAssists: Travis Sanheim, James van Riemsdyk · Wrist, 0.14 xG1–2
  4. P3 8:41PHIJoel FarabeeAssists: Scott Laughton, James van Riemsdyk · Slap, 0.07 xG1–3
  5. P3 12:05BOSDavid PastrnakPPAssists: Patrice Bergeron, Nick Ritchie · Wrist, 0.13 xG2–3
  6. P3 19:45BOSDavid PastrnakPPAssists: Brad Marchand, Patrice Bergeron · Wrist, 0.18 xG3–3
  7. OT 0:31BOSPatrice BergeronPPGWGAssists: David Pastrnak, David Krejci · Wrist, 0.49 xG4–3
Penalties (6)
  1. P2 10:10BOSAnton Blidh: Holding2 min
  2. P2 18:25PHIJames van Riemsdyk: Slashing2 min
  3. P3 11:55PHINicolas Aube-Kubel: Closing hand on puck2 min · PPG
  4. P3 14:17BOSJeremy Lauzon: Holding2 min
  5. P3 17:59PHIKevin Hayes: Hooking2 min · PPG
  6. P3 19:52PHIScott Laughton: Interference2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

BOS00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0PHI
46% to win54% to win
← BOS attackPHI attack →
  1. P1 20:00Bergeron won the faceoff against Bunnaman
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

BOSPHI
35Shots on goal25
3.0Expected goals2.1
65Shot attempts50
25Faceoffs won29
4Power plays2
4Penalty minutes8
25Hits26
13Blocked shots18
5Giveaways10
13Takeaways8

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Boston Bruins

Forward lines

  1. bestBergeron – Marchand – Pastrnak12:21

    xG 0.65–0.19 (78%)attempts 20–10goals 1–0

  2. Krejci – Smith – Ritchie10:55

    xG 0.51–0.38 (57%)attempts 13–8goals 0–1

  3. Coyle – Wagner – Frederic9:37

    xG 0.12–0.33 (26%)attempts 5–8goals 0–1

  4. Kuraly – Blidh – Bjork8:40

    xG 0.11–0.54 (16%)attempts 8–9goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestLauzon – McAvoy13:30

    xG 0.88–0.59 (60%)attempts 19–13goals 1–1

  2. Miller – Zboril10:56

    xG 0.24–0.07 (77%)attempts 13–8goals 0–0

  3. Clifton – McAvoy2:59

    xG 0.14–0.01 (95%)attempts 4–2goals 0–0

Philadelphia Flyers

Forward lines

  1. bestvan Riemsdyk – Laughton – Farabee11:34

    xG 0.46–0.13 (78%)attempts 14–10goals 1–0

  2. Hayes – Lindblom – Konecny10:14

    xG 0.52–0.60 (47%)attempts 8–11goals 0–0

  3. Giroux – Voracek – Patrick10:34

    xG 0.22–0.36 (37%)attempts 8–15goals 0–0

  4. Raffl – Aube-Kubel – Bunnaman8:17

    xG 0.06–0.40 (13%)attempts 4–8goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestBraun – Gustafsson11:28

    xG 0.38–0.17 (69%)attempts 7–6goals 1–0

  2. Sanheim – Myers16:42

    xG 0.55–0.40 (58%)attempts 20–13goals 1–0

  3. Braun – Provorov2:12

    xG 0.01–0.29 (2%)attempts 1–5goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

PHI 2.1 xGBOS 3.0 xG
0123P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

PHIBOS

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

PHI's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line PHI is favoured, below it BOS. Dots are goals.

Excitement 91/100 · #79 of 868 this seasonSwing 2.31 · 7 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 3% (winner's lowest chance)
BOS 100%5050%50PHI 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +43 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Boston Bruins win this game 67% of the time.

PHI winsBOS wins

Simulated goal difference (PHI − BOS), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).