Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Feb 2, 2021·STAPLES Center, Los Angeles

Anaheim Ducks 3, Los Angeles Kings 1

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Anaheim Ducks win this game 90% of the time.

LAK winsANA wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
ANA115118110343
LAK0417010121

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 10:07ANADanton HeinenAssists: Jakob Silfverberg, Sam Steel · Wrist, 0.13 xG1–0
  2. P2 0:17ANADavid BackesGWGAssists: Carter Rowney, Nicolas Deslauriers · Wrist, 0.14 xG2–0
  3. P2 5:32LAKArthur KaliyevAssists: Michael Amadio, Drew Doughty · Wrist, 0.27 xG2–1
  4. P3 19:14ANANicolas DeslauriersENUnassisted · Wrist, 0.68 xG3–1
Penalties (4)
  1. P1 0:03LAKKurtis MacDermid: Fighting5 min
  2. P1 0:03ANANicolas Deslauriers: Fighting5 min
  3. P3 1:01ANAHampus Lindholm: Holding2 min
  4. P3 3:17LAKLias Andersson: Too many men on the ice2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

ANA00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0LAK
46% to win54% to win
← ANA attackLAK attack →
  1. P1 20:00Backes won the faceoff against Vilardi
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

ANALAK
43Shots on goal21
5.0Expected goals2.1
70Shot attempts32
30Faceoffs won25
1Power plays1
7Penalty minutes7
20Hits22
8Blocked shots11
2Giveaways13
2Takeaways4

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Anaheim Ducks

Forward lines

  1. bestSilfverberg – Heinen – Steel12:17

    xG 1.12–0.27 (80%)attempts 18–6goals 1–0

  2. Getzlaf – Henrique – Terry10:32

    xG 0.86–0.19 (82%)attempts 13–5goals 0–0

  3. Backes – Deslauriers – Rowney8:44

    xG 0.34–0.03 (91%)attempts 7–3goals 1–0

  4. Rakell – Comtois – Lundeström10:08

    xG 0.31–0.00 (100%)attempts 12–0goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestShattenkirk – Lindholm18:09

    xG 1.79–0.60 (75%)attempts 27–10goals 1–1

  2. Hutton – Larsson15:26

    xG 1.12–0.34 (77%)attempts 15–7goals 0–0

  3. Fowler – Hakanpää17:15

    xG 0.84–0.27 (75%)attempts 17–5goals 1–0

Los Angeles Kings

Forward lines

  1. bestCarter – Amadio – Wagner4:05

    xG 0.13–0.05 (71%)attempts 3–4goals 0–0

  2. Brown – Kopitar – Iafallo7:25

    xG 0.15–0.10 (60%)attempts 5–3goals 0–0

  3. Moore – Andersson – Kaliyev2:34

    xG 0.00–0.01 (0%)attempts 0–3goals 0–0

  4. Kopitar – Kempe – Iafallo3:36

    xG 0.05–0.09 (36%)attempts 2–2goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. Doughty – Anderson19:47

    xG 0.59–0.97 (38%)attempts 8–20goals 1–0

  2. Alt – Maatta13:40

    xG 0.04–1.55 (3%)attempts 4–18goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

LAK 2.1 xGANA 5.0 xG
012345P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

LAKANA

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

LAK's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line LAK is favoured, below it ANA. Dots are goals.

Excitement 18/100 · #697 of 868 this seasonSwing 0.92 · 4 goals in reachComeback index 46% (winner's lowest chance)
ANA 100%5050%50LAK 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +18 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Anaheim Ducks win this game 90% of the time.

LAK winsANA wins

Simulated goal difference (LAK − ANA), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).