Skip to content
Ice Lab

Wed, Feb 24, 2021·Ball Arena, Denver

Minnesota Wild 6, Colorado Avalanche 2

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 62% of the time.

COL winsMIN wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
MIN1112539625
COL010110112232

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 9:44MINMats ZuccarelloAssists: Kirill Kaprizov, Victor Rask · Wrist, 0.04 xG1–0
  2. P2 7:21COLJ.T. CompherAssists: Samuel Girard, Devon Toews · Wrist, 0.06 xG1–1
  3. P2 12:31MINZach PariseAssists: Mathew Dumba, Marcus Foligno · Tip-in, 0.11 xG2–1
  4. P2 15:11MINMarcus FolignoSHGWGAssists: Ryan Hartman · Snap, 0.14 xG3–1
  5. P3 3:00COLNazem KadriPPAssists: Mikko Rantanen, Cale Makar · Wrist, 0.08 xG3–2
  6. P3 11:56MINRyan HartmanAssists: Kirill Kaprizov, Mats Zuccarello · Wrist, 0.19 xG4–2
  7. P3 12:59MINNico SturmAssists: Nick Bjugstad, Nick Bonino · Backhand, 0.18 xG5–2
  8. P3 17:32MINNico SturmENUnassisted · Wrist, 0.52 xG6–2
Penalties (6)
  1. P1 7:01COLMikko Rantanen: Tripping2 min
  2. P2 1:19MINJordan Greenway: Slashing2 min
  3. P2 4:44MINMats Zuccarello: Hooking2 min
  4. P2 12:59COLBowen Byram: Tripping2 min
  5. P2 13:18MINRyan Suter: Hooking2 min
  6. P3 1:57MINIan Cole: Holding2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

MIN00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0COL
46% to win54% to win
← MIN attackCOL attack →
  1. P1 20:00MacKinnon won the faceoff against Eriksson Ek
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

MINCOL
25Shots on goal32
3.3Expected goals2.6
43Shot attempts68
29Faceoffs won30
2Power plays4
8Penalty minutes4
10Hits13
22Blocked shots7
2Giveaways6
7Takeaways3

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. bestBonino – Bjugstad – Sturm8:00

    xG 0.63–0.14 (82%)attempts 4–6goals 1–0

  2. Fiala – Greenway – Eriksson Ek11:57

    xG 0.64–0.28 (70%)attempts 10–10goals 0–0

  3. Parise – Foligno – Hartman10:59

    xG 0.38–0.30 (55%)attempts 7–13goals 1–0

  4. Zuccarello – Rask – Kaprizov10:28

    xG 0.36–0.84 (30%)attempts 8–20goals 1–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestBrodin – Dumba17:44

    xG 1.33–0.70 (65%)attempts 16–21goals 2–0

  2. Suter – Spurgeon15:04

    xG 0.73–0.43 (63%)attempts 12–15goals 0–0

  3. Cole – Soucy13:23

    xG 0.27–0.51 (35%)attempts 5–16goals 2–1

Colorado Avalanche

Forward lines

  1. bestBurakovsky – Compher – Nichushkin8:19

    xG 0.74–0.17 (81%)attempts 15–5goals 0–0

  2. Bellemare – Jost – O'Connor6:42

    xG 0.15–0.29 (34%)attempts 5–8goals 0–0

  3. Calvert – Kadri – Donskoi9:10

    xG 0.20–0.36 (36%)attempts 8–7goals 0–1

  4. Landeskog – MacKinnon – Rantanen13:27

    xG 0.40–0.60 (40%)attempts 16–4goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestToews – Makar10:00

    xG 0.45–0.19 (70%)attempts 14–4goals 0–0

  2. Graves – Girard4:48

    xG 0.32–0.09 (79%)attempts 9–3goals 0–0

  3. Graves – Timmins6:20

    xG 0.25–0.22 (53%)attempts 8–5goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

COL 2.6 xGMIN 3.3 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

COLMIN

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

COL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line COL is favoured, below it MIN. Dots are goals.

Excitement 56/100 · #366 of 868 this seasonSwing 1.48 · 7 goals in reachComeback index 46% (winner's lowest chance)
MIN 100%5050%50COL 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +25 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 62% of the time.

COL winsMIN wins

Simulated goal difference (COL − MIN), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).