Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Feb 9, 2021·STAPLES Center, Los Angeles

San Jose Sharks 4, Los Angeles Kings 3 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, San Jose Sharks win this game 66% of the time.

LAK winsSJS wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
SJS21209111081440
LAK04212110010327

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 1:20SJSTimo MeierAssists: Ryan Donato, Radim Simek · Backhand, 0.14 xG1–0
  2. P1 17:48SJSLogan CoutureAssists: Patrick Marleau, Nikolai Knyzhov · Wrist, 0.10 xG2–0
  3. P2 7:00LAKAnze KopitarAssists: Alex Iafallo, Dustin Brown · Wrist, 0.17 xG2–1
  4. P2 17:54LAKDustin BrownPPAssists: Adrian Kempe, Drew Doughty · Wrist, 0.41 xG2–2
  5. P3 10:45LAKDustin BrownAssists: Alex Iafallo · Wrist, 0.13 xG2–3
  6. P3 19:15SJSEvander KaneAssists: Logan Couture, Brent Burns · Wrist, 0.29 xG3–3

Shootout

  1. 1. LAK Anze Kopitar stopped
  2. 2. SJS Ryan Donato stopped
  3. 3. LAK Lias Andersson stopped
  4. 4. SJS Logan Couture scored
  5. 5. LAK Gabriel Vilardi stopped
Penalties (6)
  1. P1 13:31SJSKevin Labanc: High sticking2 min
  2. P1 19:35LAKAustin Strand: High sticking2 min
  3. P2 7:07SJSTimo Meier: High sticking2 min
  4. P2 14:23SJSMatt Nieto: Hooking2 min
  5. P2 17:37SJSRyan Donato: Too many men on the ice2 min · PPG
  6. P3 4:30LAKCarl Grundstrom: High sticking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

SJS00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0LAK
46% to win54% to win
← SJS attackLAK attack →
  1. P1 20:00Couture won the faceoff against Kopitar
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

SJSLAK
40Shots on goal27
3.9Expected goals3.0
70Shot attempts43
25Faceoffs won25
2Power plays4
8Penalty minutes4
20Hits26
7Blocked shots16
3Giveaways7
0Takeaways3

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

San Jose Sharks

Forward lines

  1. bestCouture – Kane – Labanc11:26

    xG 1.08–0.55 (66%)attempts 13–8goals 0–1

  2. Hertl – Donato – Meier10:11

    xG 0.48–0.18 (72%)attempts 11–4goals 1–0

  3. Marleau – Balcers – Gregor7:27

    xG 0.01–0.03 (18%)attempts 4–4goals 0–0

  4. Sorensen – Nieto – Gambrell8:28

    xG 0.27–0.53 (33%)attempts 6–7goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestVlasic – Knyzhov10:42

    xG 0.72–0.28 (72%)attempts 14–7goals 0–0

  2. Burns – Ferraro15:18

    xG 0.80–0.50 (61%)attempts 16–8goals 0–1

  3. Karlsson – Simek13:20

    xG 0.26–0.63 (30%)attempts 8–9goals 1–1

Los Angeles Kings

Forward lines

  1. bestBrown – Kopitar – Iafallo9:15

    xG 0.26–0.12 (67%)attempts 7–6goals 0–0

  2. Wagner – Moore – Anderson-Dolan2:21

    xG 0.06–0.00 (100%)attempts 1–0goals 0–0

  3. Carter – Kempe – Vilardi4:18

    xG 0.07–0.01 (86%)attempts 3–2goals 0–0

  4. Grundstrom – Moore – Anderson-Dolan6:26

    xG 0.03–0.01 (73%)attempts 3–3goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestClague – Anderson3:34

    xG 0.06–0.01 (85%)attempts 2–2goals 0–0

  2. Maatta – Strand13:39

    xG 0.12–0.13 (47%)attempts 6–7goals 0–0

  3. Doughty – Anderson14:45

    xG 0.39–0.76 (34%)attempts 8–16goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

LAK 3.0 xGSJS 3.9 xG
01234P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

LAKSJS

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

LAK's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line LAK is favoured, below it SJS. Dots are goals.

Excitement 92/100 · #63 of 868 this seasonSwing 2.45 · 6 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 4% (winner's lowest chance)
SJS 100%5050%50LAK 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +43 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, San Jose Sharks win this game 66% of the time.

LAK winsSJS wins

Simulated goal difference (LAK − SJS), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).