Mon, Mar 15, 2021·KeyBank Center, Buffalo
Washington Capitals 6, Buffalo Sabres 0
Expected result
Based on shot quality alone, Buffalo Sabres win this game 52% of the time.
By period
Goals and shots on goal in each period.
| Team | P1 | P2 | P3 | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WSH | 113 | 311 | 26 | 630 |
| BUF | 02 | 07 | 014 | 023 |
Goals, with shots on goal in grey.
Scoring
Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.
- P1 18:46WSHEvgeny KuznetsovGWGAssists: Justin Schultz, Conor Sheary · Wrist, 0.01 xG1–0
- P2 2:41WSHNicklas BackstromAssists: T.J. Oshie, Nick Jensen · Wrist, 0.18 xG2–0
- P2 5:59WSHRichard PanikAssists: Dmitry Orlov · Slap, 0.06 xG3–0
- P2 15:07WSHDaniel SprongAssists: Nick Jensen · Snap, 0.18 xG4–0
- P3 6:46WSHGarnet HathawayAssists: Justin Schultz, Carl Hagelin · Tip-in, 0.12 xG5–0
- P3 16:21WSHAlex OvechkinAssists: Conor Sheary · Snap, 0.13 xG6–0
Penalties (3)
- P1 16:43BUFRasmus Dahlin: Hooking2 min
- P3 7:17BUFTaylor Hall: Hooking2 min
- P3 12:48WSHDmitry Orlov: Holding2 min
Replay
Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.
20:00
P1
- P1 20:00Backstrom won the faceoff against Staal
- Goal
- Shot
- Miss
- Block
- Hit
- Takeaway
- Giveaway
- Faceoff
- Penalty
The numbers
Team totals, side by side.
Line combinations that worked
Model-basedEach team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.
Washington Capitals
Forward lines
- bestHagelin – Dowd – Hathaway10:19
xG 0.34–0.01 (98%)attempts 9–9goals 1–0
- Panik – Kuznetsov – Sheary3:27
xG 0.11–0.00 (100%)attempts 2–0goals 0–0
- Kuznetsov – Vrana – Sprong11:22
xG 0.31–0.47 (40%)attempts 7–11goals 1–0
- Ovechkin – Oshie – Backstrom12:35
xG 0.40–0.57 (41%)attempts 12–12goals 1–0
Defence pairs
- bestSchultz – Orlov11:45
xG 0.51–0.09 (85%)attempts 11–4goals 2–0
- Chara – Jensen14:17
xG 0.48–0.28 (63%)attempts 12–11goals 1–0
- Dillon – van Riemsdyk2:20
xG 0.00–0.08 (0%)attempts 0–4goals 0–0
Buffalo Sabres
Forward lines
- bestSheahan – Hall – Thompson12:22
xG 0.90–0.12 (88%)attempts 19–6goals 0–0
- Skinner – Lazar – Mittelstadt8:20
xG 0.51–0.21 (70%)attempts 7–6goals 0–1
- Okposo – Rieder – Asplund12:01
xG 0.45–0.43 (51%)attempts 9–13goals 0–0
- Staal – Reinhart – Olofsson13:09
xG 0.16–0.80 (17%)attempts 8–10goals 0–3
Defence pairs
- bestIrwin – Montour15:29
xG 0.96–0.42 (69%)attempts 20–10goals 0–2
- Ristolainen – Bryson16:46
xG 0.17–0.38 (30%)attempts 6–14goals 0–1
- Miller – Dahlin18:05
xG 0.49–0.87 (36%)attempts 14–16goals 0–2
How the game flowed
Model-basedChance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.
Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.
Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute
Win probability
Model-basedHow each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.
BUF's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line BUF is favoured, below it WSH. Dots are goals.
Did the better team win?
Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.
Based on shot quality alone, Buffalo Sabres win this game 52% of the time.
Simulated goal difference (BUF − WSH), 10,000 replays
The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).