Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Feb 13, 2021·BB&T Center, Sunrise

Tampa Bay Lightning 6, Florida Panthers 1

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Tampa Bay Lightning win this game 53% of the time.

FLA winsTBL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
TBL0441727628
FLA01101419134

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P2 4:11TBLOndrej PalatPPAssists: Victor Hedman, Mikhail Sergachev · Slap, 0.08 xG1–0
  2. P2 5:32TBLMathieu JosephGWGUnassisted · Wrist, 0.22 xG2–0
  3. P2 12:58TBLTyler JohnsonAssists: Gemel Smith · Snap, 0.10 xG3–0
  4. P2 19:48TBLTyler JohnsonAssists: Ondrej Palat, Jan Rutta · Tip-in, 0.07 xG4–0
  5. P3 9:47FLAFrank VatranoAssists: Brett Connolly, Eetu Luostarinen · Wrist, 0.03 xG4–1
  6. P3 10:58TBLAlexander VolkovAssists: Gemel Smith, Mathieu Joseph · Snap, 0.16 xG5–1
  7. P3 15:45TBLBarclay GoodrowAssists: Yanni Gourde · Wrist, 0.17 xG6–1
Penalties (14)
  1. P1 4:46FLAEetu Luostarinen: Delaying game face off violation2 min
  2. P1 9:33TBLVictor Hedman: High sticking double minor4 min
  3. P1 14:35FLAMacKenzie Weegar: Roughing2 min
  4. P1 14:35TBLAlex Killorn: Interference2 min
  5. P2 3:20FLAMarkus Nutivaara: Slashing2 min · PPG
  6. P2 8:14TBLJan Rutta: Hooking2 min
  7. P2 17:08TBLPatrick Maroon: Holding the stick2 min
  8. P3 1:33TBLBlake Coleman: Fighting5 min
  9. P3 1:33FLARadko Gudas: Fighting5 min
  10. P3 12:01TBLYanni Gourde: Roughing2 min
  11. P3 12:01FLAPatric Hornqvist: Cross checking2 min
  12. P3 12:01FLAPatric Hornqvist: Roughing2 min
  13. P3 15:10TBLGemel Smith: Roughing2 min
  14. P3 15:10FLAKeith Yandle: Cross checking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

TBL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0FLA
46% to win54% to win
← TBL attackFLA attack →
  1. P1 20:00Point won the faceoff against Barkov
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

TBLFLA
28Shots on goal34
2.7Expected goals2.6
43Shot attempts60
29Faceoffs won27
3Power plays4
19Penalty minutes17
25Hits36
12Blocked shots8
5Giveaways9
4Takeaways9

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against. Shift data for this game is incomplete, so treat these as rough.

Tampa Bay Lightning

Forward lines

  1. bestJohnson – Coleman – Joseph5:41

    xG 0.18–0.03 (85%)attempts 4–2goals 0–1

  2. Smith – Joseph – Volkov3:26

    xG 0.16–0.09 (64%)attempts 1–2goals 1–0

  3. Maroon – Goodrow – Gourde9:07

    xG 0.07–0.20 (27%)attempts 5–8goals 0–0

  4. Killorn – Palat – Point11:46

    xG 0.25–0.54 (31%)attempts 6–14goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestMcDonagh – Cernak10:26

    xG 1.03–0.56 (65%)attempts 13–10goals 1–0

  2. Schenn – Sergachev7:31

    xG 0.22–0.17 (56%)attempts 5–8goals 0–1

  3. Hedman – Foote2:29

    xG 0.06–0.05 (53%)attempts 1–3goals 0–0

Florida Panthers

Forward lines

  1. bestDuclair – Verhaeghe – Barkov5:31

    xG 0.65–0.49 (57%)attempts 10–4goals 0–1

  2. Vatrano – Tippett – Luostarinen5:02

    xG 0.27–0.26 (51%)attempts 7–6goals 0–0

  3. Hornqvist – Verhaeghe – Wennberg4:50

    xG 0.23–0.22 (51%)attempts 11–1goals 0–1

  4. Connolly – Acciari – Lomberg5:17

    xG 0.07–0.13 (37%)attempts 3–5goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestYandle – Gudas8:06

    xG 0.37–0.24 (60%)attempts 8–6goals 0–0

  2. Weegar – Ekblad13:04

    xG 0.81–0.77 (51%)attempts 17–9goals 0–1

  3. Stralman – Nutivaara10:10

    xG 0.11–0.57 (16%)attempts 5–9goals 0–2

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

FLA 2.6 xGTBL 2.7 xG
-0.500.511.522.53P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

FLATBL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

FLA's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line FLA is favoured, below it TBL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 16/100 · #712 of 868 this seasonSwing 0.69 · 4 goals in reachComeback index 45% (winner's lowest chance)
TBL 100%5050%50FLA 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +22 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Tampa Bay Lightning win this game 53% of the time.

FLA winsTBL wins

Simulated goal difference (FLA − TBL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).