Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Feb 16, 2021·STAPLES Center, Los Angeles

Minnesota Wild 0, Los Angeles Kings 4

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Los Angeles Kings win this game 75% of the time.

LAK winsMIN wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
MIN03015010028
LAK1911327429

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 3:26LAKJaret Anderson-DolanPPGWGAssists: Jeff Carter, Gabriel Vilardi · Wrist, 0.05 xG0–1
  2. P2 12:03LAKTrevor MooreAssists: Jaret Anderson-Dolan · Wrist, 0.14 xG0–2
  3. P3 16:56LAKDustin BrownAssists: Anze Kopitar, Mikey Anderson · Wrist, 0.13 xG0–3
  4. P3 19:23LAKDrew DoughtyENUnassisted · Wrist, 0.50 xG0–4
Penalties (6)
  1. P1 1:58MINNick Bjugstad: Hooking2 min · PPG
  2. P1 15:53MINRyan Hartman: Slashing2 min
  3. P2 3:32LAKAustin Strand: Holding2 min
  4. P2 6:48LAKMikey Anderson: Tripping2 min
  5. P2 17:29LAKCarl Grundstrom: Hooking2 min
  6. P3 6:00MINRyan Hartman: Tripping2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

MIN00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0LAK
46% to win54% to win
← MIN attackLAK attack →
  1. P1 20:00Kopitar won the faceoff against Eriksson Ek
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

MINLAK
28Shots on goal29
2.3Expected goals3.8
51Shot attempts54
27Faceoffs won33
3Power plays3
6Penalty minutes6
36Hits15
12Blocked shots12
0Giveaways4
3Takeaways2

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. bestFoligno – Greenway – Eriksson Ek4:42

    xG 0.43–0.03 (93%)attempts 6–5goals 0–0

  2. Parise – Fiala – Eriksson Ek4:49

    xG 0.45–0.18 (71%)attempts 6–3goals 0–0

  3. Zuccarello – Johnson – Mayhew9:39

    xG 0.27–0.18 (59%)attempts 7–7goals 0–0

  4. Johansson – Fiala – Kaprizov4:23

    xG 0.04–0.04 (51%)attempts 5–2goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestSuter – Addison15:57

    xG 0.85–0.40 (68%)attempts 18–12goals 0–0

  2. Dumba – Mermis16:07

    xG 0.54–0.66 (45%)attempts 14–14goals 0–0

  3. Bartkowski – Belpedio10:57

    xG 0.13–0.95 (12%)attempts 7–14goals 0–1

Los Angeles Kings

Forward lines

  1. bestGrundstrom – Moore – Anderson-Dolan9:45

    xG 0.84–0.22 (80%)attempts 9–7goals 1–0

  2. Wagner – Luff – Andersson8:53

    xG 0.37–0.31 (54%)attempts 10–10goals 0–0

  3. Carter – Kempe – Vilardi10:01

    xG 0.45–0.44 (50%)attempts 12–10goals 0–0

  4. Brown – Kopitar – Iafallo9:25

    xG 0.46–0.51 (48%)attempts 8–8goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestMaatta – Strand13:23

    xG 0.79–0.21 (79%)attempts 12–12goals 0–0

  2. Doughty – Anderson17:01

    xG 0.75–0.76 (50%)attempts 16–13goals 1–0

  3. Roy – Bjornfot13:20

    xG 0.36–0.57 (39%)attempts 13–15goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

LAK 3.8 xGMIN 2.3 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

LAKMIN

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

LAK's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line LAK is favoured, below it MIN. Dots are goals.

Excitement 5/100 · #806 of 868 this seasonSwing 0.60 · 3 goals in reachComeback index 54% (winner's lowest chance)
MIN 100%5050%50LAK 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +14 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Los Angeles Kings win this game 75% of the time.

LAK winsMIN wins

Simulated goal difference (LAK − MIN), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).