Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sun, Feb 21, 2021·Edgewood Tahoe Resort, StatelineOutdoor game

Philadelphia Flyers 3, Boston Bruins 7

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Boston Bruins win this game 76% of the time.

BOS winsPHI wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
PHI2110315319
BOS28415112735

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 0:34BOSDavid PastrnakAssists: Brad Marchand, Patrice Bergeron · Snap, 0.08 xG0–1
  2. P1 6:41PHIJoel FarabeeAssists: Sean Couturier, James van Riemsdyk · Wrist, 0.15 xG1–1
  3. P1 14:48PHISean CouturierAssists: Kevin Hayes, James van Riemsdyk · Wrist, 0.23 xG2–1
  4. P1 15:27BOSCharlie McAvoyAssists: Brad Marchand, Connor Clifton · Slap, 0.01 xG2–2
  5. P2 0:46BOSDavid PastrnakAssists: Nick Ritchie, Urho Vaakanainen · Wrist, 0.08 xG2–3
  6. P2 16:14BOSCharlie CoyleGWGAssists: Craig Smith · Snap, 0.11 xG2–4
  7. P2 16:47BOSTrent FredericAssists: John Moore, Connor Clifton · Wrist, 0.04 xG2–5
  8. P2 17:53BOSNick RitchiePPAssists: John Moore, Craig Smith · Slap, 0.36 xG2–6
  9. P3 12:45PHIJames van RiemsdykPPAssists: Kevin Hayes, Ivan Provorov · Tip-in, 0.08 xG3–6
  10. P3 17:04BOSDavid PastrnakAssists: Jack Studnicka · Slap, 0.16 xG3–7
Penalties (6)
  1. P1 12:34PHISean Couturier: Tripping2 min
  2. P2 6:17PHIAndy Andreoff: Too many men on the ice2 min
  3. P2 16:47PHIAndy Andreoff: Roughing2 min · PPG
  4. P2 18:16BOSAnders Bjork: Holding2 min
  5. P3 9:31BOSAnders Bjork: Hooking2 min
  6. P3 12:37BOSBrandon Carlo: Interference2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

PHI00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0BOS
46% to win54% to win
← PHI attackBOS attack →
  1. P1 20:00Bergeron won the faceoff against Couturier
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

PHIBOS
19Shots on goal35
1.9Expected goals3.6
53Shot attempts61
26Faceoffs won28
3Power plays3
6Penalty minutes6
31Hits23
8Blocked shots16
6Giveaways5
2Takeaways7

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Philadelphia Flyers

Forward lines

  1. bestHayes – Raffl – Aube-Kubel8:03

    xG 0.53–0.30 (64%)attempts 8–8goals 0–1

  2. Bunnaman – Patrick – Sushko6:42

    xG 0.15–0.13 (54%)attempts 11–4goals 0–0

  3. Hayes – Aube-Kubel – Patrick3:03

    xG 0.00–0.00attempts 0–0goals 0–0

  4. van Riemsdyk – Couturier – Farabee9:44

    xG 0.37–0.38 (49%)attempts 11–9goals 1–3

Defence pairs

  1. bestGostisbehere – Sanheim12:11

    xG 0.58–0.51 (53%)attempts 10–17goals 0–1

  2. Gustafsson – Hagg10:07

    xG 0.24–0.23 (50%)attempts 9–4goals 1–1

  3. Provorov – Myers12:09

    xG 0.12–0.40 (24%)attempts 12–8goals 0–3

Boston Bruins

Forward lines

  1. bestBergeron – Marchand – Pastrnak11:06

    xG 0.56–0.05 (91%)attempts 14–6goals 2–0

  2. Bjork – DeBrusk – Studnicka11:04

    xG 0.59–0.26 (70%)attempts 6–11goals 0–0

  3. Wagner – Kuraly – Frederic9:18

    xG 0.23–0.15 (61%)attempts 9–4goals 1–1

  4. Smith – Coyle – Ritchie10:47

    xG 0.48–0.64 (43%)attempts 14–13goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestMoore – McAvoy4:12

    xG 0.31–0.08 (79%)attempts 6–6goals 0–0

  2. Clifton – Carlo8:14

    xG 0.46–0.24 (66%)attempts 15–7goals 1–1

  3. Moore – Clifton9:23

    xG 0.26–0.11 (70%)attempts 4–8goals 2–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

BOS 3.6 xGPHI 1.9 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

BOSPHI

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

BOS's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line BOS is favoured, below it PHI. Dots are goals.

Excitement 66/100 · #287 of 868 this seasonSwing 1.20 · 8 goals in reachComeback index 34% (winner's lowest chance)
PHI 100%5050%50BOS 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +20 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Boston Bruins win this game 76% of the time.

BOS winsPHI wins

Simulated goal difference (BOS − PHI), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).