Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Feb 27, 2021·SAP Center at San Jose, San Jose

St. Louis Blues 7, San Jose Sharks 6

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, San Jose Sharks win this game 77% of the time.

SJS winsSTL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
STL1631639731
SJS21222028640

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 0:17SJSTimo MeierAssists: Rudolfs Balcers, Dylan Gambrell · Wrist, 0.03 xG0–1
  2. P1 6:08STLMarco ScandellaUnassisted · Slap, 0.06 xG1–1
  3. P1 10:11SJSEvander KanePPAssists: Logan Couture, Brent Burns · Wrist, 0.21 xG1–2
  4. P2 3:34STLSammy BlaisAssists: Vince Dunn, Ryan O'Reilly · Backhand, 0.07 xG2–2
  5. P2 6:43SJSTimo MeierPPAssists: Kevin Labanc · Snap, 0.06 xG2–3
  6. P2 7:28STLBrayden SchennAssists: David Perron · Slap, 0.05 xG3–3
  7. P2 10:34SJSEvander KaneUnassisted · Snap, 0.03 xG3–4
  8. P2 18:16STLZachary SanfordAssists: Jordan Kyrou, Torey Krug · Wrist, 0.13 xG4–4
  9. P3 1:18STLMackenzie MacEachernSHAssists: Zachary Sanford, Marco Scandella · Wrist, 0.16 xG5–4
  10. P3 2:13SJSKevin LabancAssists: John Leonard, Timo Meier · Snap, 0.16 xG5–5
  11. P3 3:20STLRyan O'ReillyAssists: Justin Faulk · Wrist, 0.26 xG6–5
  12. P3 6:31SJSLogan CoutureAssists: Brent Burns, Mario Ferraro · Deflected, 0.04 xG6–6
  13. P3 7:14STLMarco ScandellaGWGAssists: Oskar Sundqvist, Mike Hoffman · Wrist, 0.10 xG7–6
Penalties (10)
  1. P1 9:28STLDavid Perron: Holding2 min · PPG
  2. P2 1:07STLZachary Sanford: Tripping2 min
  3. P2 5:53STLSammy Blais: Cross checking2 min · PPG
  4. P2 10:34STLJordan Binnington: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  5. P2 11:36STLNiko Mikkola: Delaying game smothering puck2 min
  6. P2 11:44SJSErik Karlsson: Hooking2 min
  7. P2 0:00STLJustin Faulk: Tripping2 min
  8. P3 10:05SJSPatrick Marleau: Tripping2 min
  9. P3 19:57SJSEvander Kane: Roughing2 min
  10. P3 19:57STLZachary Sanford: Roughing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

STL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0SJS
46% to win54% to win
← STL attackSJS attack →
  1. P1 20:00Gambrell won the faceoff against Schenn
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

STLSJS
31Shots on goal40
2.4Expected goals4.3
48Shot attempts68
41Faceoffs won20
2Power plays6
14Penalty minutes6
24Hits19
13Blocked shots12
7Giveaways8
8Takeaways10

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

St. Louis Blues

Forward lines

  1. bestO'Reilly – Sanford – Kyrou9:49

    xG 1.04–0.23 (82%)attempts 16–6goals 1–1

  2. Hoffman – O'Reilly – Blais2:19

    xG 0.10–0.03 (79%)attempts 4–1goals 1–0

  3. Hoffman – Sundqvist – Blais6:46

    xG 0.09–0.05 (64%)attempts 4–1goals 0–0

  4. Clifford – Sundqvist – MacEachern2:05

    xG 0.00–0.30 (0%)attempts 0–4goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestScandella – Dunn9:36

    xG 0.60–0.15 (80%)attempts 9–7goals 1–0

  2. Faulk – Krug10:56

    xG 0.76–0.60 (56%)attempts 12–9goals 2–1

  3. Bortuzzo – Mikkola5:39

    xG 0.41–0.28 (60%)attempts 4–9goals 0–1

San Jose Sharks

Forward lines

  1. bestMarleau – Donato – Leonard10:32

    xG 0.58–0.06 (91%)attempts 9–5goals 0–0

  2. Couture – Kane – Labanc12:42

    xG 0.55–0.57 (49%)attempts 16–11goals 1–2

  3. Nieto – Gregor – Chmelevski5:31

    xG 0.25–0.53 (32%)attempts 3–8goals 0–1

  4. Meier – Balcers – Gambrell12:28

    xG 0.33–0.77 (30%)attempts 11–14goals 1–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestVlasic – Knyzhov11:46

    xG 0.72–0.54 (57%)attempts 10–15goals 1–3

  2. Burns – Karlsson2:20

    xG 0.01–0.05 (20%)attempts 2–2goals 0–0

  3. Karlsson – Simek12:14

    xG 0.45–0.50 (47%)attempts 9–8goals 1–2

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

SJS 4.3 xGSTL 2.4 xG
012345P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

SJSSTL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

SJS's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line SJS is favoured, below it STL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 99/100 · #2 of 868 this seasonSwing 3.50 · 13 goals in reachComeback index 23% (winner's lowest chance)
STL 100%5050%50SJS 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +32 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, San Jose Sharks win this game 77% of the time.

SJS winsSTL wins

Simulated goal difference (SJS − STL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).