Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Mar 9, 2021·Nationwide Arena, Columbus

Florida Panthers 4, Columbus Blue Jackets 2

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Florida Panthers win this game 58% of the time.

CBJ winsFLA wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
FLA11521414433
CBJ01619115240

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 4:59FLAJuho LammikkoAssists: MacKenzie Weegar · Backhand, 0.04 xG1–0
  2. P2 2:45FLAPatric HornqvistPPAssists: Aaron Ekblad, Jonathan Huberdeau · Slap, 0.23 xG2–0
  3. P2 5:45CBJMichael Del ZottoAssists: Eric Robinson, Alexandre Texier · Wrist, 0.11 xG2–1
  4. P2 18:12FLAOwen TippettPPGWGAssists: Gustav Forsling, Alexander Wennberg · Snap, 0.05 xG3–1
  5. P3 11:38CBJOliver BjorkstrandAssists: Zach Werenski · Tip-in, 0.10 xG3–2
  6. P3 19:37FLACarter VerhaegheENAssists: MacKenzie Weegar · Wrist, 0.72 xG4–2
Penalties (7)
  1. P1 2:00CBJDavid Savard: Tripping2 min
  2. P1 7:27CBJNick Foligno: Holding2 min
  3. P1 9:00FLAGustav Forsling: Tripping2 min
  4. P1 19:49FLACarter Verhaeghe: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  5. P2 1:56CBJKevin Stenlund: Hooking2 min · PPG
  6. P2 16:22CBJRiley Nash: Hooking2 min · PPG
  7. P3 16:59FLAAaron Ekblad: Holding2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

FLA00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0CBJ
46% to win54% to win
← FLA attackCBJ attack →
  1. P1 20:00Wennberg won the faceoff against Nash
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

FLACBJ
33Shots on goal40
3.5Expected goals3.1
58Shot attempts64
31Faceoffs won21
4Power plays3
6Penalty minutes8
26Hits20
11Blocked shots16
6Giveaways10
10Takeaways12

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Florida Panthers

Forward lines

  1. bestLammikko – Acciari – Lomberg9:07

    xG 0.54–0.48 (53%)attempts 11–8goals 1–0

  2. Hornqvist – Huberdeau – Wennberg7:41

    xG 0.27–0.23 (54%)attempts 5–4goals 0–2

  3. Vatrano – Tippett – Luostarinen8:22

    xG 0.38–0.40 (49%)attempts 5–9goals 0–0

  4. Verhaeghe – Barkov – Marchment10:58

    xG 0.63–0.65 (49%)attempts 15–12goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestGudas – Forsling15:51

    xG 1.02–0.82 (55%)attempts 20–18goals 0–2

  2. Weegar – Ekblad14:50

    xG 0.99–0.95 (51%)attempts 18–18goals 0–0

  3. Weegar – Nutivaara2:04

    xG 0.00–0.04 (0%)attempts 0–1goals 0–0

Columbus Blue Jackets

Forward lines

  1. bestFoligno – Atkinson – Jenner10:02

    xG 0.92–0.66 (58%)attempts 15–13goals 0–0

  2. Nash – Bjorkstrand – Laine9:36

    xG 0.33–0.21 (62%)attempts 6–4goals 1–0

  3. Domi – Roslovic – Bemstrom5:50

    xG 0.25–0.32 (43%)attempts 7–7goals 0–1

  4. Stenlund – Texier – Robinson5:56

    xG 0.19–0.65 (22%)attempts 5–9goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestDel Zotto – Gavrikov12:33

    xG 0.96–0.71 (57%)attempts 17–14goals 1–0

  2. Savard – Carlsson12:33

    xG 0.41–0.46 (47%)attempts 9–8goals 0–1

  3. Jones – Werenski16:43

    xG 0.85–1.12 (43%)attempts 19–21goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

CBJ 3.1 xGFLA 3.5 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

CBJFLA

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

CBJ's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CBJ is favoured, below it FLA. Dots are goals.

Excitement 46/100 · #454 of 868 this seasonSwing 1.34 · 6 goals in reachComeback index 46% (winner's lowest chance)
FLA 100%5050%50CBJ 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +17 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Florida Panthers win this game 58% of the time.

CBJ winsFLA wins

Simulated goal difference (CBJ − FLA), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).