Thu, Mar 18, 2021·PNC Arena, Raleigh
Columbus Blue Jackets 3, Carolina Hurricanes 2 (OT)
Expected result
Based on shot quality alone, Carolina Hurricanes win this game 62% of the time.
By period
Goals and shots on goal in each period.
| Team | P1 | P2 | P3 | OT | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CBJ | 114 | 16 | 06 | 12 | 328 |
| CAR | 07 | 212 | 04 | 04 | 227 |
Goals, with shots on goal in grey.
Scoring
Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.
- P1 14:11CBJSeth JonesAssists: Oliver Bjorkstrand, Zach Werenski · Wrist, 0.17 xG1–0
- P2 0:51CARSebastian AhoAssists: Nino Niederreiter, Warren Foegele · Snap, 0.11 xG1–1
- P2 12:20CARSebastian AhoPPAssists: Martin Necas, Dougie Hamilton · Snap, 0.11 xG1–2
- P2 17:50CBJKevin StenlundAssists: Max Domi, Oliver Bjorkstrand · Snap, 0.13 xG2–2
- OT 4:09CBJSeth JonesGWGAssists: Oliver Bjorkstrand · Snap, 0.21 xG3–2
Penalties (4)
- P1 1:24CBJMax Domi: Cross checking2 min
- P2 4:38CBJNick Foligno: Roughing2 min
- P2 11:09CBJStefan Matteau: Tripping2 min · PPG
- P2 15:46CARBrett Pesce: Tripping2 min
Replay
Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.
20:00
P1
- P1 20:00Foligno won the faceoff against Staal
- Goal
- Shot
- Miss
- Block
- Hit
- Takeaway
- Giveaway
- Faceoff
- Penalty
The numbers
Team totals, side by side.
Line combinations that worked
Model-basedEach team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.
Columbus Blue Jackets
Forward lines
- bestNash – Jenner – Bjorkstrand4:16
xG 0.23–0.08 (73%)attempts 2–4goals 0–0
- Nash – Matteau – Robinson6:28
xG 0.16–0.04 (81%)attempts 6–1goals 0–0
- Jenner – MacInnis – Stenlund3:36
xG 0.14–0.11 (56%)attempts 3–1goals 0–0
- Foligno – Stenlund – Laine3:45
xG 0.09–0.21 (29%)attempts 2–4goals 0–0
Defence pairs
- Jones – Werenski19:49
xG 0.95–0.97 (49%)attempts 20–20goals 1–1
- Del Zotto – Kukan11:33
xG 0.21–0.48 (30%)attempts 9–6goals 0–0
- Savard – Gavrikov18:33
xG 0.18–0.82 (18%)attempts 9–20goals 0–0
Carolina Hurricanes
Forward lines
- bestMartinook – McGinn – Foegele9:34
xG 0.58–0.05 (91%)attempts 10–2goals 0–0
- Staal – Fast – Svechnikov14:13
xG 0.79–0.59 (57%)attempts 15–14goals 0–1
- Paquette – Lorentz – Geekie6:55
xG 0.07–0.02 (81%)attempts 3–2goals 0–0
- Niederreiter – Aho – Necas14:07
xG 0.43–0.49 (47%)attempts 12–13goals 0–0
Defence pairs
- bestHamilton – Slavin17:35
xG 1.17–0.62 (65%)attempts 18–12goals 1–1
- Skjei – Pesce17:14
xG 0.55–0.37 (59%)attempts 17–13goals 0–0
- Fleury – Bean10:59
xG 0.22–0.43 (34%)attempts 6–12goals 0–0
How the game flowed
Model-basedChance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.
Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.
Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute
Win probability
Model-basedHow each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.
CAR's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CAR is favoured, below it CBJ. Dots are goals.
Did the better team win?
Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.
Based on shot quality alone, Carolina Hurricanes win this game 62% of the time.
Simulated goal difference (CAR − CBJ), 10,000 replays
The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).