Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Mar 25, 2021·PPG Paints Arena, Pittsburgh

Buffalo Sabres 0, Pittsburgh Penguins 4

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 52% of the time.

PIT winsBUF wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
BUF01505016036
PIT11219210431

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 17:21PITRadim ZohornaGWGAssists: Anthony Angello, Frederick Gaudreau · Snap, 0.10 xG0–1
  2. P2 1:27PITJared McCannPPAssists: Kris Letang, Sidney Crosby · Wrist, 0.12 xG0–2
  3. P3 8:56PITJared McCannPPAssists: Kris Letang, Sidney Crosby · Wrist, 0.04 xG0–3
  4. P3 18:54PITJake GuentzelENAssists: Bryan Rust, Sidney Crosby · Wrist, 0.63 xG0–4
Penalties (8)
  1. P1 7:06PITZachary Aston-Reese: Slashing2 min
  2. P2 0:14BUFDylan Cozens: Hooking2 min · PPG
  3. P2 2:26PITAnthony Angello: Tripping2 min
  4. P2 5:32BUFJacob Bryson: High sticking2 min
  5. P2 17:03PITSidney Crosby: High sticking2 min
  6. P3 8:49BUFRiley Sheahan: Holding the stick2 min · PPG
  7. P3 10:47BUFSteven Fogarty: Holding2 min
  8. P3 13:59PITMike Matheson: Slashing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

BUF00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0PIT
46% to win54% to win
← BUF attackPIT attack →
  1. P1 20:00Sheahan won the faceoff against Crosby
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

BUFPIT
36Shots on goal31
4.0Expected goals4.3
67Shot attempts59
25Faceoffs won33
4Power plays4
8Penalty minutes8
30Hits23
15Blocked shots15
9Giveaways7
2Takeaways17

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Buffalo Sabres

Forward lines

  1. bestStaal – Hall – Reinhart13:17

    xG 1.73–0.23 (88%)attempts 25–10goals 0–0

  2. Sheahan – Olofsson – Cozens8:07

    xG 0.56–0.37 (60%)attempts 11–9goals 0–0

  3. Skinner – Lazar – Mittelstadt7:26

    xG 0.27–0.43 (38%)attempts 6–10goals 0–1

  4. Eakin – Fogarty – Smith6:47

    xG 0.04–0.27 (12%)attempts 2–3goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestJokiharju – Dahlin11:11

    xG 1.37–0.29 (83%)attempts 17–10goals 0–1

  2. Ristolainen – Bryson11:44

    xG 0.65–0.36 (65%)attempts 16–7goals 0–0

  3. Miller – Montour10:33

    xG 0.40–0.25 (61%)attempts 5–9goals 0–0

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. bestMcCann – Rodrigues – Aston-Reese8:30

    xG 0.53–0.13 (80%)attempts 14–5goals 0–0

  2. Gaudreau – Angello – Zohorna6:00

    xG 0.41–0.04 (91%)attempts 8–1goals 1–0

  3. Sceviour – Jankowski – Lafferty11:15

    xG 0.44–0.75 (37%)attempts 5–18goals 0–0

  4. Crosby – Rust – Guentzel14:36

    xG 0.62–1.38 (31%)attempts 15–18goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestMatheson – Ceci9:32

    xG 0.55–0.40 (58%)attempts 12–7goals 1–0

  2. Letang – Marino2:18

    xG 0.10–0.16 (37%)attempts 1–3goals 0–0

  3. Pettersson – Marino15:09

    xG 0.65–0.97 (40%)attempts 13–10goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

PIT 4.3 xGBUF 4.0 xG
012345P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

PITBUF

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

PIT's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line PIT is favoured, below it BUF. Dots are goals.

Excitement 3/100 · #825 of 868 this seasonSwing 0.55 · 3 goals in reachComeback index 52% (winner's lowest chance)
BUF 100%5050%50PIT 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +17 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 52% of the time.

PIT winsBUF wins

Simulated goal difference (PIT − BUF), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).