Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Apr 3, 2021·TD Garden, Boston

Pittsburgh Penguins 5, Boston Bruins 7

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Boston Bruins win this game 66% of the time.

BOS winsPIT wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
PIT1929210528
BOS06511211728

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 3:24PITMark JankowskiAssists: Mike Matheson · Tip-in, 0.08 xG1–0
  2. P2 0:11BOSPatrice BergeronUnassisted · Wrist, 0.17 xG1–1
  3. P2 0:45BOSDavid PastrnakAssists: Nick Ritchie, David Krejci · Wrist, 0.08 xG1–2
  4. P2 2:45PITJake GuentzelAssists: Sidney Crosby, Brian Dumoulin · Wrist, 0.11 xG2–2
  5. P2 5:11PITJared McCannPPAssists: Jake Guentzel, Sidney Crosby · Wrist, 0.13 xG3–2
  6. P2 14:56BOSBrad MarchandAssists: Matt Grzelcyk, Craig Smith · Wrist, 0.06 xG3–3
  7. P2 18:29BOSDavid KrejciPPAssists: Brad Marchand, David Pastrnak · Tip-in, 0.11 xG3–4
  8. P2 19:40BOSBrad MarchandAssists: Craig Smith, Charlie McAvoy · Tip-in, 0.08 xG3–5
  9. P3 4:38PITCody CeciAssists: Mark Jankowski, Sam Lafferty · Wrist, 0.04 xG4–5
  10. P3 13:28BOSDavid PastrnakGWGAssists: Nick Ritchie · Wrist, 0.04 xG4–6
  11. P3 18:45PITSidney CrosbySHAssists: Jake Guentzel · Wrist, 0.04 xG5–6
  12. P3 18:59BOSBrad MarchandENAssists: Charlie Coyle · Wrist, 0.63 xG5–7
Penalties (8)
  1. P2 4:45BOSCharlie McAvoy: Closing hand on puck2 min · PPG
  2. P2 9:59PITSam Lafferty: Elbowing2 min
  3. P2 10:20BOSMatt Grzelcyk: Tripping2 min
  4. P2 15:10BOSBrad Marchand: Slashing2 min
  5. P2 15:10PITKris Letang: Roughing2 min
  6. P2 16:53PITEvan Rodrigues: Hooking2 min · PPG
  7. P3 17:49PITKris Letang: Hooking2 min
  8. P3 18:49BOSPatrice Bergeron: High sticking double minor4 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

PIT00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0BOS
46% to win54% to win
← PIT attackBOS attack →
  1. P1 20:00Crosby won the faceoff against Bergeron
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

PITBOS
28Shots on goal28
1.9Expected goals2.8
42Shot attempts41
23Faceoffs won34
3Power plays3
8Penalty minutes10
25Hits28
7Blocked shots8
12Giveaways3
12Takeaways13

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. bestGaudreau – Tanev – Aston-Reese7:41

    xG 0.35–0.13 (73%)attempts 7–2goals 0–0

  2. Jankowski – Lafferty – Angello5:00

    xG 0.12–0.17 (41%)attempts 3–6goals 2–1

  3. Crosby – Rust – Guentzel15:33

    xG 0.39–0.48 (45%)attempts 11–10goals 1–2

  4. Zucker – McCann – Rodrigues13:13

    xG 0.31–0.56 (36%)attempts 9–7goals 0–2

Defence pairs

  1. bestDumoulin – Marino2:03

    xG 0.06–0.00 (100%)attempts 2–0goals 0–0

  2. Pettersson – Marino10:32

    xG 0.26–0.31 (46%)attempts 6–7goals 0–2

  3. Matheson – Ceci14:37

    xG 0.39–0.45 (46%)attempts 11–10goals 2–1

Boston Bruins

Forward lines

  1. bestBergeron – Marchand – Smith12:17

    xG 0.93–0.26 (78%)attempts 16–5goals 3–0

  2. Krejci – Ritchie – Pastrnak13:33

    xG 0.74–0.16 (82%)attempts 10–7goals 2–0

  3. Coyle – Kuraly – Bjork12:09

    xG 0.10–0.24 (29%)attempts 4–9goals 0–2

  4. Senyshyn – Frederic – Studnicka6:55

    xG 0.01–0.28 (5%)attempts 2–6goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestGrzelcyk – McAvoy15:20

    xG 0.74–0.21 (78%)attempts 14–7goals 4–1

  2. Kampfer – Zboril15:31

    xG 0.64–0.48 (57%)attempts 9–13goals 1–0

  3. Zboril – McAvoy2:29

    xG 0.11–0.00 (100%)attempts 2–1goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

BOS 2.8 xGPIT 1.9 xG
-0.500.511.522.53P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

BOSPIT

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

BOS's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line BOS is favoured, below it PIT. Dots are goals.

Excitement 94/100 · #43 of 868 this seasonSwing 2.18 · 12 goals in reachComeback index 28% (winner's lowest chance)
PIT 100%5050%50BOS 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +26 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Boston Bruins win this game 66% of the time.

BOS winsPIT wins

Simulated goal difference (BOS − PIT), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).