Skip to content
Ice Lab

Mon, Apr 19, 2021·Bridgestone Arena, Nashville

Chicago Blackhawks 2, Nashville Predators 5

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Chicago Blackhawks win this game 52% of the time.

NSH winsCHI wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
CHI18114010232
NSH19211210530

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 6:22NSHMatt DucheneAssists: Erik Haula, Matt Benning · Deflected, 0.10 xG0–1
  2. P1 15:14CHIAlex DeBrincatPPAssists: Pius Suter, Patrick Kane · Wrist, 0.27 xG1–1
  3. P2 4:48NSHCalle JarnkrokAssists: Mikael Granlund, Luke Kunin · Wrist, 0.08 xG1–2
  4. P2 5:39NSHMattias EkholmGWGAssists: Ryan Johansen · Snap, 0.06 xG1–3
  5. P2 11:52CHIDavid KampfAssists: Adam Gaudette · Wrist, 0.12 xG2–3
  6. P3 0:23NSHTanner JeannotAssists: Ryan Ellis · Deflected, 0.09 xG2–4
  7. P3 0:41NSHLuke KuninAssists: Mikael Granlund, Calle Jarnkrok · Deflected, 0.15 xG2–5
Penalties (10)
  1. P1 14:05NSHMattias Ekholm: Tripping2 min · PPG
  2. P1 16:41NSHYakov Trenin: Tripping2 min
  3. P2 6:37CHICalvin de Haan: Holding the stick2 min
  4. P2 7:42NSHNick Cousins: Too many men on the ice2 min
  5. P2 16:18CHIDuncan Keith: Tripping2 min
  6. P3 6:14CHIPius Suter: High sticking double minor4 min
  7. P3 13:44NSHRyan Johansen: Interference2 min
  8. P3 17:20CHIAlex DeBrincat: Roughing2 min
  9. P3 19:49NSHNick Cousins: Misconduct10 min
  10. P3 19:49NSHNick Cousins: Cross checking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

CHI00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0NSH
46% to win54% to win
← CHI attackNSH attack →
  1. P1 20:00Sissons won the faceoff against Kampf
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

CHINSH
32Shots on goal30
2.2Expected goals2.1
57Shot attempts46
25Faceoffs won27
5Power plays5
10Penalty minutes20
22Hits19
10Blocked shots16
9Giveaways12
3Takeaways7

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Chicago Blackhawks

Forward lines

  1. bestKane – Hinostroza – Suter6:09

    xG 0.38–0.30 (56%)attempts 5–5goals 0–1

  2. Kubalik – Strome – Kurashev3:21

    xG 0.07–0.02 (78%)attempts 3–2goals 0–0

  3. Connolly – Carpenter – Kampf4:29

    xG 0.12–0.11 (52%)attempts 4–4goals 0–0

  4. Kane – DeBrincat – Suter2:31

    xG 0.02–0.08 (20%)attempts 2–5goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestKeith – Stillman3:07

    xG 0.40–0.16 (71%)attempts 5–4goals 0–1

  2. Keith – Murphy5:11

    xG 0.35–0.16 (68%)attempts 8–2goals 0–1

  3. de Haan – Murphy5:39

    xG 0.26–0.16 (61%)attempts 9–2goals 0–0

Nashville Predators

Forward lines

  1. bestDuchene – Haula – Cousins7:07

    xG 0.59–0.03 (95%)attempts 10–3goals 1–0

  2. Jarnkrok – Granlund – Kunin11:00

    xG 0.74–0.33 (69%)attempts 13–13goals 2–0

  3. Sissons – Trenin – Jeannot7:18

    xG 0.16–0.17 (49%)attempts 6–7goals 1–0

  4. Duchene – Johansen – Arvidsson2:11

    xG 0.00–0.04 (0%)attempts 0–2goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestEllis – Ekholm14:07

    xG 0.78–0.44 (64%)attempts 17–8goals 3–0

  2. Josi – Benning12:43

    xG 0.62–0.45 (58%)attempts 10–21goals 1–1

  3. Gudbranson – Harpur11:55

    xG 0.25–0.44 (36%)attempts 7–14goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

NSH 2.1 xGCHI 2.2 xG
00.511.52P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

NSHCHI

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

NSH's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line NSH is favoured, below it CHI. Dots are goals.

Excitement 53/100 · #393 of 868 this seasonSwing 1.18 · 7 goals in reachComeback index 52% (winner's lowest chance)
CHI 100%5050%50NSH 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +19 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Chicago Blackhawks win this game 52% of the time.

NSH winsCHI wins

Simulated goal difference (NSH − CHI), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).