Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Mar 6, 2021·PPG Paints Arena, Pittsburgh

Philadelphia Flyers 3, Pittsburgh Penguins 4

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 67% of the time.

PIT winsPHI wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
PHI162808322
PIT2711119427

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 6:08PHITravis KonecnyAssists: Scott Laughton · Snap, 0.44 xG1–0
  2. P1 7:54PITEvgeni MalkinPPAssists: Sidney Crosby, Jake Guentzel · Backhand, 0.08 xG1–1
  3. P1 18:01PITBryan RustPPAssists: Jake Guentzel, Sidney Crosby · Wrist, 0.18 xG1–2
  4. P2 1:20PHIKevin HayesPPAssists: Ivan Provorov, Travis Konecny · Snap, 0.07 xG2–2
  5. P2 12:04PHIShayne GostisbehereAssists: Scott Laughton, Jakub Voracek · Slap, 0.03 xG3–2
  6. P2 18:10PITZachary Aston-ReeseAssists: Brandon Tanev · Wrist, 0.02 xG3–3
  7. P3 10:41PITJared McCannGWGAssists: Brandon Tanev, Evgeni Malkin · Wrist, 0.26 xG3–4
Penalties (11)
  1. P1 0:56PITEvgeni Malkin: Interference2 min
  2. P1 6:33PHIIvan Provorov: Hooking2 min · PPG
  3. P1 11:38PITZachary Aston-Reese: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  4. P1 11:38PHIRobert Hagg: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  5. P1 13:34PITMarcus Pettersson: Holding2 min
  6. P1 17:49PHIMichael Raffl: Tripping2 min · PPG
  7. P1 19:24PITMarcus Pettersson: Hooking2 min · PPG
  8. P2 4:17PHITravis Konecny: Tripping2 min
  9. P2 8:47PITMarcus Pettersson: Interference2 min
  10. P2 11:28PITKris Letang: Roughing2 min
  11. P2 11:28PHIJames van Riemsdyk: Roughing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

PHI00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0PIT
46% to win54% to win
← PHI attackPIT attack →
  1. P1 20:00Couturier won the faceoff against Crosby
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

PHIPIT
22Shots on goal27
2.0Expected goals2.9
38Shot attempts46
44Faceoffs won24
4Power plays3
10Penalty minutes12
32Hits35
14Blocked shots12
5Giveaways9
4Takeaways8

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Philadelphia Flyers

Forward lines

  1. bestHayes – Laughton – Konecny9:46

    xG 0.56–0.27 (67%)attempts 7–9goals 1–1

  2. van Riemsdyk – Couturier – Farabee10:39

    xG 0.08–0.08 (50%)attempts 4–4goals 0–0

  3. Giroux – Aube-Kubel – Lindblom7:04

    xG 0.08–0.16 (33%)attempts 3–4goals 0–0

  4. Voracek – Raffl – Patrick4:03

    xG 0.00–0.10 (0%)attempts 1–1goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestGostisbehere – Hagg8:45

    xG 0.95–0.01 (99%)attempts 11–3goals 1–0

  2. Braun – Sanheim2:15

    xG 0.06–0.09 (42%)attempts 3–2goals 0–0

  3. Gostisbehere – Sanheim3:01

    xG 0.00–0.04 (0%)attempts 1–2goals 0–0

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. bestMalkin – Kapanen – McCann10:56

    xG 0.41–0.09 (82%)attempts 8–3goals 0–0

  2. Crosby – Rust – Guentzel10:43

    xG 0.42–0.39 (52%)attempts 9–9goals 0–0

  3. Blueger – Tanev – Aston-Reese9:20

    xG 0.08–0.22 (28%)attempts 5–5goals 1–0

  4. Jankowski – Lafferty – Rodrigues3:29

    xG 0.03–0.46 (7%)attempts 2–2goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestMatheson – Ceci13:34

    xG 0.54–0.20 (73%)attempts 10–11goals 1–0

  2. Pettersson – Marino8:30

    xG 0.21–0.00 (100%)attempts 4–1goals 0–0

  3. Letang – Dumoulin14:20

    xG 0.38–0.30 (56%)attempts 13–8goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

PIT 2.9 xGPHI 2.0 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

PITPHI

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

PIT's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line PIT is favoured, below it PHI. Dots are goals.

Excitement 74/100 · #221 of 868 this seasonSwing 1.93 · 7 goals in reachComeback index 26% (winner's lowest chance)
PHI 100%5050%50PIT 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +31 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 67% of the time.

PIT winsPHI wins

Simulated goal difference (PIT − PHI), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).