Skip to content
Ice Lab

Wed, Apr 14, 2021·SAP Center at San Jose, San Jose

Anaheim Ducks 4, San Jose Sharks 1

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Anaheim Ducks win this game 71% of the time.

SJS winsANA wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
ANA1112917427
SJS06011111128

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 8:08ANARyan GetzlafAssists: Troy Terry · Snap, 0.23 xG1–0
  2. P2 2:29ANADerek GrantGWGAssists: Josh Manson, Alexander Volkov · Tip-in, 0.09 xG2–0
  3. P2 13:40ANAAlexander VolkovAssists: Maxime Comtois, Derek Grant · Wrist, 0.19 xG3–0
  4. P3 17:44SJSErik KarlssonAssists: Timo Meier, Brent Burns · Slap, 0.05 xG3–1
  5. P3 19:30ANAJakob SilfverbergPPAssists: Kevin Shattenkirk, Cam Fowler · Tip-in, 0.09 xG4–1
Penalties (13)
  1. P1 10:48SJSTimo Meier: Tripping2 min
  2. P1 16:27SJSNikolai Knyzhov: High sticking2 min
  3. P1 18:54ANAHaydn Fleury: Tripping2 min
  4. P2 4:22ANACam Fowler: Tripping2 min
  5. P2 18:41SJSLogan Couture: Hooking2 min
  6. P3 2:30SJSDylan Gambrell: Fighting5 min
  7. P3 2:30ANAJosh Manson: Fighting5 min
  8. P3 7:14SJSRadim Simek: Roughing2 min
  9. P3 7:14ANATroy Terry: Roughing2 min
  10. P3 11:04ANADerek Grant: Tripping2 min
  11. P3 13:59ANAMaxime Comtois: Fighting5 min
  12. P3 13:59SJSRadim Simek: Fighting5 min
  13. P3 18:40SJSEvander Kane: Holding the stick2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

ANA00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0SJS
46% to win54% to win
← ANA attackSJS attack →
  1. P1 20:00Getzlaf won the faceoff against Hertl
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

ANASJS
27Shots on goal28
3.6Expected goals2.4
52Shot attempts51
27Faceoffs won33
4Power plays3
18Penalty minutes20
21Hits36
11Blocked shots17
6Giveaways14
13Takeaways12

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Anaheim Ducks

Forward lines

  1. bestRakell – Steel – Comtois6:35

    xG 0.41–0.16 (72%)attempts 8–5goals 0–0

  2. Getzlaf – Terry – Jones7:01

    xG 0.42–0.21 (67%)attempts 7–7goals 1–0

  3. Grant – Deslauriers – Volkov9:38

    xG 0.41–0.35 (54%)attempts 5–7goals 1–0

  4. Henrique – Silfverberg – Heinen7:32

    xG 0.15–0.18 (45%)attempts 7–5goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestFowler – Welinski12:46

    xG 0.79–0.58 (58%)attempts 12–14goals 1–0

  2. Manson – Drysdale9:18

    xG 0.32–0.18 (64%)attempts 4–5goals 1–0

  3. Shattenkirk – Fleury8:16

    xG 0.24–0.12 (67%)attempts 14–3goals 0–0

San Jose Sharks

Forward lines

  1. bestCouture – Kane – Hertl2:26

    xG 0.33–0.03 (91%)attempts 5–1goals 0–0

  2. Couture – Kane – Balcers6:57

    xG 0.57–0.41 (58%)attempts 11–8goals 0–0

  3. Marleau – Gregor – Handemark5:26

    xG 0.17–0.18 (48%)attempts 6–4goals 0–0

  4. Hertl – Labanc – Meier6:04

    xG 0.13–0.50 (21%)attempts 3–5goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestKarlsson – Knyzhov9:49

    xG 0.66–0.08 (89%)attempts 14–4goals 0–0

  2. Burns – Simek2:11

    xG 0.14–0.00 (100%)attempts 3–0goals 0–0

  3. Burns – Knyzhov2:31

    xG 0.07–0.00 (100%)attempts 3–2goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

SJS 2.4 xGANA 3.6 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

SJSANA

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

SJS's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line SJS is favoured, below it ANA. Dots are goals.

Excitement 24/100 · #650 of 868 this seasonSwing 0.67 · 5 goals in reachComeback index 46% (winner's lowest chance)
ANA 100%5050%50SJS 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +18 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Anaheim Ducks win this game 71% of the time.

SJS winsANA wins

Simulated goal difference (SJS − ANA), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).