Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Apr 17, 2021·American Airlines Center, Dallas

Columbus Blue Jackets 1, Dallas Stars 5

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Dallas Stars win this game 83% of the time.

DAL winsCBJ wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
CBJ190607122
DAL11148013532

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 6:06CBJVladislav GavrikovAssists: Oliver Bjorkstrand, Cam Atkinson · Tip-in, 0.11 xG1–0
  2. P1 12:35DALJamie BennAssists: John Klingberg, Denis Gurianov · Wrist, 0.23 xG1–1
  3. P2 10:10DALDenis GurianovGWGAssists: Jamie Benn · Slap, 0.11 xG1–2
  4. P2 13:14DALJoe PavelskiAssists: Jason Robertson, Esa Lindell · Backhand, 0.12 xG1–3
  5. P2 13:34DALJohn KlingbergAssists: Jason Robertson, Roope Hintz · Wrist, 0.08 xG1–4
  6. P2 16:40DALEsa LindellAssists: Roope Hintz, Joe Pavelski · Wrist, 0.03 xG1–5
Penalties (7)
  1. P1 2:48CBJJack Roslovic: Slashing2 min
  2. P1 18:15DALJason Dickinson: Holding2 min
  3. P2 17:47DALRhett Gardner: Slashing2 min
  4. P2 17:47CBJMax Domi: High sticking2 min
  5. P2 17:47CBJMax Domi: Misconduct10 min
  6. P2 17:47CBJMax Domi: Slashing2 min
  7. P3 18:24CBJEric Robinson: Tripping2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

CBJ00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0DAL
46% to win54% to win
← CBJ attackDAL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Benn won the faceoff against Domi
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

CBJDAL
22Shots on goal32
2.0Expected goals4.3
43Shot attempts68
22Faceoffs won39
1Power plays3
18Penalty minutes4
21Hits16
16Blocked shots13
14Giveaways10
2Takeaways3

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against. Shift data for this game is incomplete, so treat these as rough.

Columbus Blue Jackets

Forward lines

  1. Atkinson – Bjorkstrand – Roslovic8:25

    xG 0.23–0.27 (47%)attempts 7–5goals 1–1

  2. Grigorenko – MacInnis – Dunne3:38

    xG 0.00–0.09 (0%)attempts 0–4goals 0–0

  3. Dalpe – Matteau – Texier6:07

    xG 0.07–0.18 (28%)attempts 4–9goals 0–0

  4. Atkinson – Roslovic – Robinson4:02

    xG 0.39–0.51 (43%)attempts 6–5goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. Harrington – Peeke13:45

    xG 0.54–0.68 (44%)attempts 14–18goals 0–2

  2. Del Zotto – Gavrikov16:23

    xG 0.77–1.35 (36%)attempts 20–18goals 1–3

  3. Jones – Lehtonen19:17

    xG 0.06–1.67 (3%)attempts 4–21goals 0–0

Dallas Stars

Forward lines

  1. bestBenn – Dickinson – Gurianov9:32

    xG 0.90–0.23 (80%)attempts 14–6goals 2–0

  2. Pavelski – Hintz – Robertson11:06

    xG 0.79–0.15 (84%)attempts 15–5goals 3–0

  3. Cogliano – Faksa – Kero3:02

    xG 0.51–0.39 (57%)attempts 5–6goals 0–0

  4. Comeau – Cogliano – Faksa8:15

    xG 0.21–0.14 (61%)attempts 3–9goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestKlingberg – Lindell16:15

    xG 1.30–0.31 (81%)attempts 19–11goals 4–1

  2. Oleksiak – Heiskanen16:00

    xG 1.50–0.56 (73%)attempts 18–14goals 0–0

  3. Sekera – Vatanen16:09

    xG 0.86–0.45 (66%)attempts 19–10goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

DAL 4.3 xGCBJ 2.0 xG
012345P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

DALCBJ

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

DAL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line DAL is favoured, below it CBJ. Dots are goals.

Excitement 27/100 · #602 of 868 this seasonSwing 0.91 · 5 goals in reachComeback index 35% (winner's lowest chance)
CBJ 100%5050%50DAL 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +21 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Dallas Stars win this game 83% of the time.

DAL winsCBJ wins

Simulated goal difference (DAL − CBJ), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).