Skip to content
Ice Lab

Wed, Apr 21, 2021·United Center, Chicago

Nashville Predators 4, Chicago Blackhawks 5 (OT)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Nashville Predators win this game 63% of the time.

CHI winsNSH wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTTotal
NSH1162141901440
CHI1110103712530

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 4:14CHIPius SuterAssists: Brandon Hagel · Snap, 0.29 xG0–1
  2. P1 14:16NSHEeli TolvanenAssists: Viktor Arvidsson, Ryan Johansen · Wrist, 0.12 xG1–1
  3. P2 13:39NSHColton SissonsUnassisted · Wrist, 0.19 xG2–1
  4. P2 19:58NSHMikael GranlundAssists: Mattias Ekholm · Wrist, 0.08 xG3–1
  5. P3 0:58NSHLuke KuninAssists: Mikael Granlund, Roman Josi · Wrist, 0.09 xG4–1
  6. P3 10:04CHIWyatt KalynukAssists: Patrick Kane, Brandon Hagel · Wrist, 0.12 xG4–2
  7. P3 11:13CHIVinnie HinostrozaAssists: Kirby Dach, Nikita Zadorov · Snap, 0.21 xG4–3
  8. P3 12:55CHIDominik KubalikAssists: Pius Suter · Snap, 0.17 xG4–4
  9. OT 3:00CHIBrandon HagelGWGAssists: Vinnie Hinostroza, Kirby Dach · Wrist, 0.09 xG4–5
Penalties (5)
  1. P1 11:29NSHRyan Ellis: Holding2 min
  2. P2 0:37NSHErik Gudbranson: Cross checking2 min
  3. P2 7:12CHIRyan Carpenter: Tripping2 min
  4. P3 1:52CHIAdam Boqvist: Cross checking2 min
  5. P3 13:09NSHViktor Arvidsson: High sticking double minor4 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

NSH00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0CHI
46% to win54% to win
← NSH attackCHI attack →
  1. P1 20:00Kampf won the faceoff against Sissons
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

NSHCHI
40Shots on goal30
3.6Expected goals2.8
60Shot attempts62
30Faceoffs won22
2Power plays4
8Penalty minutes4
36Hits29
22Blocked shots13
13Giveaways11
11Takeaways8

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Nashville Predators

Forward lines

  1. bestJohansen – Arvidsson – Tolvanen10:18

    xG 0.76–0.15 (83%)attempts 9–7goals 0–0

  2. Duchene – Haula – Cousins10:30

    xG 0.88–0.41 (68%)attempts 13–17goals 0–1

  3. Sissons – Trenin – Jeannot8:15

    xG 0.55–0.48 (53%)attempts 11–7goals 1–1

  4. Jarnkrok – Granlund – Kunin10:18

    xG 0.51–0.61 (45%)attempts 11–7goals 2–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestJosi – Gudbranson12:56

    xG 1.38–0.21 (87%)attempts 14–9goals 1–1

  2. Benning – Harpur8:10

    xG 0.40–0.09 (81%)attempts 6–4goals 1–0

  3. Josi – Benning3:25

    xG 0.44–0.40 (52%)attempts 6–8goals 0–1

Chicago Blackhawks

Forward lines

  1. Connolly – Carpenter – Kampf2:00

    xG 0.03–0.01 (68%)attempts 4–1goals 0–0

  2. Hinostroza – Carpenter – Kampf2:01

    xG 0.07–0.12 (37%)attempts 4–1goals 0–1

  3. Kane – Hagel – Kurashev2:53

    xG 0.13–0.30 (31%)attempts 4–4goals 1–0

  4. Kane – Hinostroza – Suter2:13

    xG 0.10–0.43 (19%)attempts 4–5goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestZadorov – Boqvist2:07

    xG 0.12–0.00 (100%)attempts 3–0goals 0–0

  2. de Haan – Murphy2:31

    xG 0.17–0.11 (61%)attempts 4–3goals 0–0

  3. Keith – Boqvist7:11

    xG 0.31–0.38 (45%)attempts 8–8goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

CHI 2.8 xGNSH 3.6 xG
01234P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

CHINSH

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

CHI's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CHI is favoured, below it NSH. Dots are goals.

Excitement 97/100 · #16 of 868 this seasonSwing 2.24 · 9 goals in reach · 3-goal lead cutComeback index 1% (winner's lowest chance)
NSH 100%5050%50CHI 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +37 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Nashville Predators win this game 63% of the time.

CHI winsNSH wins

Simulated goal difference (CHI − NSH), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).