Skip to content
Ice Lab

Mon, Feb 22, 2021·SAP Center at San Jose, San Jose

Minnesota Wild 6, San Jose Sharks 2

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 64% of the time.

SJS winsMIN wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
MIN212312110634
SJS11311109233

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 0:45SJSBrent BurnsAssists: Timo Meier, Rudolfs Balcers · Backhand, 0.13 xG0–1
  2. P1 7:49MINMats ZuccarelloAssists: Victor Rask, Kirill Kaprizov · Snap, 0.13 xG1–1
  3. P1 8:00MINKirill KaprizovAssists: Mats Zuccarello, Carson Soucy · Tip-in, 0.14 xG2–1
  4. P2 3:36MINIan ColeGWGAssists: Ryan Hartman, Marcus Foligno · Wrist, 0.05 xG3–1
  5. P2 10:48MINMarcus FolignoAssists: Ryan Hartman, Zach Parise · Slap, 0.10 xG4–1
  6. P2 11:57SJSLogan CoutureAssists: Evander Kane, Kevin Labanc · Wrist, 0.16 xG4–2
  7. P2 17:25MINJonas BrodinPPAssists: Mats Zuccarello, Victor Rask · Snap, 0.06 xG5–2
  8. P3 16:57MINVictor RaskENAssists: Carson Soucy, Mats Zuccarello · Snap, 0.68 xG6–2
Penalties (7)
  1. P1 9:56MINJordan Greenway: Slashing2 min
  2. P1 13:21MINIan Cole: High sticking2 min
  3. P1 17:49MINMarcus Foligno: Fighting5 min
  4. P1 17:49SJSNikolai Knyzhov: Fighting5 min
  5. P2 0:55SJSLogan Couture: Slashing2 min
  6. P2 13:28SJSNikolai Knyzhov: High sticking double minor4 min · PPG
  7. P2 19:02MINJordan Greenway: Tripping2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

MIN00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0SJS
46% to win54% to win
← MIN attackSJS attack →
  1. P1 20:00Hertl won the faceoff against Eriksson Ek
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

MINSJS
34Shots on goal33
4.3Expected goals3.5
56Shot attempts57
34Faceoffs won33
3Power plays3
11Penalty minutes11
15Hits21
12Blocked shots9
11Giveaways6
8Takeaways8

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. bestBonino – Bjugstad – Sturm7:43

    xG 0.27–0.15 (64%)attempts 6–5goals 0–0

  2. Zuccarello – Rask – Kaprizov8:30

    xG 0.44–0.33 (57%)attempts 8–6goals 2–0

  3. Parise – Foligno – Hartman11:34

    xG 0.39–0.33 (54%)attempts 9–7goals 2–0

  4. Fiala – Greenway – Eriksson Ek11:04

    xG 0.50–1.11 (31%)attempts 15–14goals 0–2

Defence pairs

  1. Cole – Soucy12:57

    xG 0.38–0.55 (41%)attempts 7–7goals 3–1

  2. Suter – Spurgeon16:00

    xG 0.81–1.15 (41%)attempts 14–20goals 1–0

  3. Brodin – Dumba14:55

    xG 0.47–1.12 (30%)attempts 18–15goals 0–1

San Jose Sharks

Forward lines

  1. bestHertl – Meier – Balcers11:30

    xG 1.01–0.43 (70%)attempts 14–6goals 0–2

  2. Marleau – Sorensen – Nieto3:05

    xG 0.28–0.00 (100%)attempts 4–1goals 0–0

  3. Couture – Kane – Labanc10:34

    xG 0.50–0.36 (58%)attempts 9–10goals 1–0

  4. Sorensen – Donato – Gregor4:39

    xG 0.35–0.23 (60%)attempts 6–6goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestVlasic – Knyzhov13:29

    xG 1.07–0.13 (89%)attempts 12–7goals 0–0

  2. Claesson – Meloche10:07

    xG 0.54–0.49 (53%)attempts 8–13goals 0–1

  3. Burns – Ferraro14:27

    xG 0.95–1.04 (48%)attempts 14–18goals 2–2

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

SJS 3.5 xGMIN 4.3 xG
012345P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

SJSMIN

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

SJS's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line SJS is favoured, below it MIN. Dots are goals.

Excitement 52/100 · #400 of 868 this seasonSwing 1.09 · 7 goals in reachComeback index 31% (winner's lowest chance)
MIN 100%5050%50SJS 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +18 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 64% of the time.

SJS winsMIN wins

Simulated goal difference (SJS − MIN), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).