Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Apr 24, 2021·Scotiabank Saddledome, Calgary

Montréal Canadiens 2, Calgary Flames 5

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Montréal Canadiens win this game 51% of the time.

CGY winsMTL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
MTL1141909232
CGY11129214534

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 11:32MTLNick SuzukiAssists: Jake Evans, Erik Gustafsson · Backhand, 0.19 xG1–0
  2. P1 19:29CGYJohnny GaudreauAssists: Matthew Tkachuk, Chris Tanev · Wrist, 0.07 xG1–1
  3. P2 2:14CGYMilan LucicAssists: Derek Ryan · Wrist, 0.05 xG1–2
  4. P2 5:31CGYJohnny GaudreauGWGAssists: Andrew Mangiapane · Snap, 0.16 xG1–3
  5. P2 18:03MTLTyler ToffoliPPAssists: Corey Perry, Erik Gustafsson · Snap, 0.22 xG2–3
  6. P3 4:41CGYBrett RitchieAssists: Derek Ryan, Joakim Nordstrom · Snap, 0.32 xG2–4
  7. P3 17:31CGYRasmus AnderssonENUnassisted · Wrist, 0.47 xG2–5
Penalties (8)
  1. P1 8:43MTLArtturi Lehkonen: Holding2 min
  2. P2 7:12CGYDillon Dube: Interference goalkeeper2 min
  3. P2 13:31CGYAndrew Mangiapane: Tripping2 min
  4. P2 16:08CGYMikael Backlund: Roughing2 min · PPG
  5. P3 2:20MTLBen Chiarot: Holding the stick2 min
  6. P3 8:24CGYElias Lindholm: Roughing2 min
  7. P3 8:24MTLAlexander Romanov: Roughing2 min
  8. P3 18:51CGYJuuso Välimäki: High sticking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

MTL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0CGY
46% to win54% to win
← MTL attackCGY attack →
  1. P1 20:00Danault won the faceoff against Lindholm
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

MTLCGY
32Shots on goal34
3.0Expected goals2.9
60Shot attempts46
32Faceoffs won30
4Power plays2
6Penalty minutes10
22Hits16
4Blocked shots15
7Giveaways13
6Takeaways3

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Montréal Canadiens

Forward lines

  1. bestPerry – Toffoli – Suzuki8:37

    xG 0.31–0.14 (70%)attempts 9–5goals 0–1

  2. Tatar – Danault – Anderson6:03

    xG 0.09–0.03 (73%)attempts 6–3goals 0–0

  3. Armia – Lehkonen – Kotkaniemi6:09

    xG 0.26–0.25 (51%)attempts 3–6goals 0–0

  4. Staal – Lehkonen – Evans2:03

    xG 0.05–0.05 (47%)attempts 3–3goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestGustafsson – Romanov4:09

    xG 0.56–0.05 (92%)attempts 6–2goals 1–0

  2. Petry – Edmundson11:26

    xG 0.35–0.10 (78%)attempts 8–6goals 0–0

  3. Weber – Chiarot13:42

    xG 0.50–0.34 (59%)attempts 16–9goals 0–0

Calgary Flames

Forward lines

  1. bestLindholm – Tkachuk – Dube7:14

    xG 0.21–0.03 (87%)attempts 7–1goals 0–0

  2. Monahan – Mangiapane – Dube3:08

    xG 0.20–0.06 (76%)attempts 3–3goals 0–0

  3. Lucic – Robinson – Ryan4:06

    xG 0.10–0.04 (74%)attempts 6–3goals 1–0

  4. Gaudreau – Lindholm – Tkachuk4:22

    xG 0.08–0.07 (53%)attempts 2–5goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestTanev – Välimäki2:20

    xG 0.36–0.02 (94%)attempts 2–2goals 1–0

  2. Stone – Välimäki6:09

    xG 0.23–0.16 (59%)attempts 6–6goals 0–0

  3. Giordano – Stone4:03

    xG 0.18–0.12 (60%)attempts 3–4goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

CGY 2.9 xGMTL 3.0 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

CGYMTL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

CGY's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CGY is favoured, below it MTL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 54/100 · #388 of 868 this seasonSwing 1.27 · 7 goals in reachComeback index 33% (winner's lowest chance)
MTL 100%5050%50CGY 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +21 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Montréal Canadiens win this game 51% of the time.

CGY winsMTL wins

Simulated goal difference (CGY − MTL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).