Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Apr 29, 2021·Xcel Energy Center, St. Paul

St. Louis Blues 5, Minnesota Wild 4 (OT)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, St. Louis Blues win this game 55% of the time.

MIN winsSTL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTTotal
STL17251712521
MIN061123903430

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 3:14STLSammy BlaisAssists: Torey Krug, Jaden Schwartz · Wrist, 0.14 xG1–0
  2. P2 7:34STLTyler BozakSHUnassisted · Wrist, 0.30 xG2–0
  3. P2 10:55STLMarco ScandellaAssists: Jordan Kyrou · Wrist, 0.04 xG3–0
  4. P2 17:01MINJoel Eriksson EkUnassisted · Snap, 0.09 xG3–1
  5. P3 2:21MINKevin FialaAssists: Victor Rask · Slap, 0.04 xG3–2
  6. P3 6:16STLRyan O'ReillyPPAssists: David Perron, Torey Krug · Snap, 0.17 xG4–2
  7. P3 15:21MINVictor RaskAssists: Kevin Fiala, Carson Soucy · Wrist, 0.03 xG4–3
  8. P3 19:08MINKirill KaprizovAssists: Kevin Fiala, Jared Spurgeon · Wrist, 0.05 xG4–4
  9. OT 3:43STLRyan O'ReillyGWGAssists: Jordan Kyrou · Backhand, 0.18 xG5–4
Penalties (8)
  1. P1 11:42MINRyan Hartman: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  2. P1 14:32STLRobert Bortuzzo: Fighting5 min
  3. P1 14:32MINJordan Greenway: Fighting5 min
  4. P2 6:29MINMarcus Foligno: Fighting5 min
  5. P2 6:29STLRobert Bortuzzo: Instigator2 min
  6. P2 6:29STLRobert Bortuzzo: Fighting5 min
  7. P2 6:29STLRobert Bortuzzo: Misconduct10 min
  8. P3 5:08MINMathew Dumba: High sticking2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

STL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0MIN
46% to win54% to win
← STL attackMIN attack →
  1. P1 20:00Rask won the faceoff against Bozak
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

STLMIN
21Shots on goal30
2.2Expected goals1.9
43Shot attempts59
29Faceoffs won32
2Power plays1
22Penalty minutes14
16Hits21
19Blocked shots9
8Giveaways7
6Takeaways8

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

St. Louis Blues

Forward lines

  1. bestClifford – Sanford – Barbashev9:04

    xG 0.24–0.11 (68%)attempts 8–5goals 0–0

  2. Perron – O'Reilly – Schenn13:57

    xG 0.43–0.54 (44%)attempts 8–16goals 0–1

  3. Hoffman – Kyrou – Thomas11:13

    xG 0.22–0.34 (39%)attempts 11–12goals 1–1

  4. Bozak – Schwartz – Blais11:08

    xG 0.14–0.32 (31%)attempts 5–14goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestKrug – Parayko14:31

    xG 0.55–0.34 (62%)attempts 10–15goals 1–0

  2. Faulk – Mikkola4:45

    xG 0.12–0.02 (88%)attempts 3–3goals 0–0

  3. Bortuzzo – Mikkola4:11

    xG 0.12–0.03 (81%)attempts 7–3goals 0–0

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. bestFoligno – Greenway – Eriksson Ek11:42

    xG 0.60–0.24 (71%)attempts 12–6goals 1–0

  2. Zuccarello – Hartman – Kaprizov5:14

    xG 0.12–0.10 (54%)attempts 5–1goals 0–0

  3. Johansson – Hartman – Fiala7:16

    xG 0.10–0.11 (48%)attempts 6–7goals 0–1

  4. Zuccarello – Rask – Kaprizov9:00

    xG 0.08–0.10 (44%)attempts 8–5goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestSuter – Spurgeon16:51

    xG 0.43–0.19 (69%)attempts 13–8goals 1–1

  2. Brodin – Dumba20:31

    xG 0.43–0.32 (58%)attempts 20–10goals 0–0

  3. Cole – Soucy14:00

    xG 0.46–0.77 (37%)attempts 15–14goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

MIN 1.9 xGSTL 2.2 xG
00.511.52P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

MINSTL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

MIN's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line MIN is favoured, below it STL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 97/100 · #15 of 868 this seasonSwing 2.25 · 9 goals in reach · 3-goal lead cutComeback index 46% (winner's lowest chance)
STL 100%5050%50MIN 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +49 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, St. Louis Blues win this game 55% of the time.

MIN winsSTL wins

Simulated goal difference (MIN − STL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).