Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Apr 27, 2021·Bridgestone Arena, Nashville

Florida Panthers 7, Nashville Predators 4

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Florida Panthers win this game 88% of the time.

NSH winsFLA wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
FLA121221414756
NSH1831309430

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 6:07NSHRyan EllisAssists: Mattias Ekholm · Slap, 0.02 xG0–1
  2. P1 8:28FLAAleksander BarkovPPAssists: Keith Yandle, Jonathan Huberdeau · Wrist, 0.05 xG1–1
  3. P2 2:56FLAAnthony DuclairPPAssists: Jonathan Huberdeau, Sam Bennett · Snap, 0.10 xG2–1
  4. P2 6:50NSHLuke KuninAssists: Calle Jarnkrok, Mikael Granlund · Wrist, 0.13 xG2–2
  5. P2 12:40NSHTanner JeannotAssists: Roman Josi, Colton Sissons · Wrist, 0.18 xG2–3
  6. P2 17:32FLAAleksander BarkovAssists: Owen Tippett, MacKenzie Weegar · Wrist, 0.06 xG3–3
  7. P2 19:37NSHRyan EllisAssists: Matt Duchene, Nick Cousins · Slap, 0.10 xG3–4
  8. P3 4:57FLAOwen TippettAssists: Jonathan Huberdeau, Sam Bennett · Wrist, 0.31 xG4–4
  9. P3 7:15FLAFrank VatranoGWGAssists: Alexander Wennberg, Aleksi Heponiemi · Wrist, 0.03 xG5–4
  10. P3 13:48FLAJonathan HuberdeauPPAssists: Aleksander Barkov, Sam Bennett · Wrist, 0.06 xG6–4
  11. P3 18:23FLAJonathan HuberdeauENUnassisted · Other, 0.66 xG7–4
Penalties (7)
  1. P1 7:48NSHBen Harpur: High sticking2 min · PPG
  2. P1 17:11FLAGustav Forsling: Tripping2 min
  3. P2 1:32NSHRyan Johansen: Hooking2 min · PPG
  4. P2 3:15NSHMikael Granlund: Interference2 min
  5. P2 9:53FLAJuho Lammikko: High sticking2 min
  6. P3 8:06NSHMatt Duchene: Holding the stick2 min
  7. P3 12:57NSHYakov Trenin: Tripping2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

FLA00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0NSH
46% to win54% to win
← FLA attackNSH attack →
  1. P1 20:00Bennett won the faceoff against Sissons
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

FLANSH
56Shots on goal30
5.7Expected goals2.7
80Shot attempts37
36Faceoffs won29
5Power plays2
4Penalty minutes10
13Hits17
4Blocked shots13
8Giveaways6
2Takeaways1

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Florida Panthers

Forward lines

  1. bestHuberdeau – Bennett – Tippett9:46

    xG 1.73–0.24 (88%)attempts 25–8goals 1–0

  2. Wennberg – Vatrano – Heponiemi9:36

    xG 0.79–0.26 (75%)attempts 17–8goals 1–0

  3. Duclair – Barkov – Denisenko9:09

    xG 0.27–0.36 (43%)attempts 10–4goals 0–2

  4. Gusev – Lammikko – Lomberg6:16

    xG 0.00–0.41 (0%)attempts 0–4goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestWeegar – Forsling16:37

    xG 1.94–0.28 (87%)attempts 27–7goals 2–1

  2. Yandle – Nutivaara13:00

    xG 1.03–0.21 (83%)attempts 22–4goals 0–0

  3. Montour – Nutivaara2:56

    xG 0.02–0.09 (17%)attempts 4–2goals 0–0

Nashville Predators

Forward lines

  1. Johansen – Arvidsson – Tolvanen3:12

    xG 0.10–0.08 (57%)attempts 1–3goals 0–0

  2. Duchene – Haula – Cousins7:28

    xG 0.41–0.42 (49%)attempts 5–9goals 1–0

  3. Sissons – Trenin – Jeannot12:25

    xG 0.54–0.63 (46%)attempts 11–11goals 1–0

  4. Jarnkrok – Granlund – Kunin9:26

    xG 0.36–0.72 (33%)attempts 5–20goals 2–0

Defence pairs

  1. Gudbranson – Harpur7:56

    xG 0.10–0.20 (34%)attempts 2–8goals 0–0

  2. Benning – Harpur3:55

    xG 0.25–0.41 (38%)attempts 3–6goals 0–0

  3. Ellis – Ekholm13:37

    xG 0.66–0.82 (45%)attempts 10–18goals 3–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

NSH 2.7 xGFLA 5.7 xG
0123456P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

NSHFLA

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

NSH's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line NSH is favoured, below it FLA. Dots are goals.

Excitement 96/100 · #27 of 868 this seasonSwing 2.44 · 11 goals in reachComeback index 20% (winner's lowest chance)
FLA 100%5050%50NSH 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +32 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Florida Panthers win this game 88% of the time.

NSH winsFLA wins

Simulated goal difference (NSH − FLA), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).