Skip to content
Ice Lab

Fri, Apr 30, 2021·Ball Arena, Denver

San Jose Sharks 0, Colorado Avalanche 3

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Colorado Avalanche win this game 82% of the time.

COL winsSJS wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
SJS060807021
COL213012111336

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 11:13COLGabriel LandeskogPPGWGAssists: Cale Makar, Mikko Rantanen · Tip-in, 0.20 xG0–1
  2. P1 13:13COLCale MakarPPAssists: Mikko Rantanen, Joonas Donskoi · Wrist, 0.03 xG0–2
  3. P3 18:21COLMikko RantanenENAssists: Gabriel Landeskog, Carl Soderberg · Wrist, 0.61 xG0–3
Penalties (10)
  1. P1 5:27COLCarl Soderberg: Interference2 min
  2. P1 10:25SJSAlexander Barabanov: Delaying game puck over glass2 min · PPG
  3. P1 12:20SJSAlexander True: Tripping2 min · PPG
  4. P2 7:21SJSMario Ferraro: Tripping2 min
  5. P2 8:22COLMikko Rantanen: Interference2 min
  6. P2 15:10SJSNoah Gregor: Holding2 min
  7. P3 1:41COLPatrik Nemeth: High sticking2 min
  8. P3 9:38COLNathan MacKinnon: Roughing2 min
  9. P3 9:38COLNathan MacKinnon: Fighting5 min
  10. P3 9:38SJSKevin Labanc: Fighting5 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

SJS00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0COL
46% to win54% to win
← SJS attackCOL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Hertl won the faceoff against MacKinnon
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

SJSCOL
21Shots on goal36
1.3Expected goals3.1
38Shot attempts65
18Faceoffs won27
4Power plays4
13Penalty minutes13
9Hits9
19Blocked shots11
5Giveaways2
4Takeaways2

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

San Jose Sharks

Forward lines

  1. bestCouture – Balcers – Gregor4:55

    xG 0.21–0.13 (62%)attempts 8–4goals 0–0

  2. Marleau – Donato – Chekhovich2:13

    xG 0.00–0.00attempts 0–0goals 0–0

  3. Marleau – Donato – Labanc5:52

    xG 0.04–0.04 (48%)attempts 3–4goals 0–0

  4. Labanc – Meier – True3:02

    xG 0.03–0.07 (31%)attempts 4–2goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestVlasic – Jaros7:06

    xG 0.10–0.05 (67%)attempts 5–4goals 0–0

  2. Vlasic – Ferraro2:21

    xG 0.03–0.00 (97%)attempts 2–1goals 0–0

  3. Burns – Karlsson2:49

    xG 0.00–0.01 (0%)attempts 3–1goals 0–0

Colorado Avalanche

Forward lines

  1. bestLandeskog – MacKinnon – Rantanen8:55

    xG 0.32–0.04 (89%)attempts 8–4goals 0–0

  2. Compher – Bellemare – Sherwood4:49

    xG 0.33–0.07 (83%)attempts 9–2goals 0–0

  3. Soderberg – Kadri – Donskoi6:58

    xG 0.14–0.10 (59%)attempts 4–4goals 0–0

  4. Burakovsky – Nichushkin – Jost9:54

    xG 0.19–0.20 (48%)attempts 10–8goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestGirard – Makar4:41

    xG 0.31–0.01 (98%)attempts 8–2goals 0–0

  2. Timmins – Makar2:09

    xG 0.23–0.00 (100%)attempts 3–0goals 0–0

  3. Nemeth – Toews4:25

    xG 0.17–0.04 (82%)attempts 6–3goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

COL 3.1 xGSJS 1.3 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

COLSJS

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

COL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line COL is favoured, below it SJS. Dots are goals.

Excitement 5/100 · #814 of 868 this seasonSwing 0.58 · 3 goals in reachComeback index 52% (winner's lowest chance)
SJS 100%5050%50COL 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +14 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Colorado Avalanche win this game 82% of the time.

COL winsSJS wins

Simulated goal difference (COL − SJS), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).