Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, May 13, 2021·Enterprise Center, St. Louis

Minnesota Wild 3, St. Louis Blues 7

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, St. Louis Blues win this game 56% of the time.

STL winsMIN wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
MIN3110603320
STL0741139727

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 3:23MINNico SturmAssists: Nick Bonino, Nick Bjugstad · Backhand, 0.20 xG1–0
  2. P1 4:06MINRyan SuterAssists: Marcus Foligno · Wrist, 0.01 xG2–0
  3. P1 16:04MINMarcus FolignoAssists: Ian Cole, Jordan Greenway · Deflected, 0.26 xG3–0
  4. P2 5:16STLZachary SanfordAssists: Kyle Clifford, Niko Mikkola · Snap, 0.05 xG3–1
  5. P2 8:29STLBrayden SchennPPAssists: Ryan O'Reilly, Mike Hoffman · Wrist, 0.20 xG3–2
  6. P2 11:33STLDavid PerronAssists: Ivan Barbashev, Justin Faulk · Snap, 0.05 xG3–3
  7. P2 14:03STLBrayden SchennPPGWGAssists: David Perron, Mike Hoffman · Wrist, 0.11 xG3–4
  8. P3 5:50STLDavid PerronPPAssists: Mike Hoffman, Torey Krug · Slap, 0.05 xG3–5
  9. P3 6:33STLJordan KyrouAssists: Klim Kostin, Marco Scandella · Wrist, 0.09 xG3–6
  10. P3 15:29STLJordan KyrouAssists: Robert Bortuzzo, Steven Santini · Wrist, 0.04 xG3–7
Penalties (6)
  1. P1 12:30MINKyle Rau: High sticking2 min
  2. P1 16:43STLJustin Faulk: Tripping2 min
  3. P2 7:20MINIan Cole: Hooking2 min · PPG
  4. P2 13:00MINRyan Hartman: Tripping2 min · PPG
  5. P3 4:42MINJoel Eriksson Ek: Tripping2 min · PPG
  6. P3 11:18STLTyler Bozak: Slashing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

MIN00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0STL
46% to win54% to win
← MIN attackSTL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Sanford won the faceoff against Eriksson Ek
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

MINSTL
20Shots on goal27
2.4Expected goals2.8
35Shot attempts46
25Faceoffs won26
2Power plays4
8Penalty minutes4
24Hits20
8Blocked shots7
11Giveaways16
6Takeaways10

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. bestBonino – Bjugstad – Sturm8:38

    xG 0.96–0.48 (67%)attempts 5–12goals 1–1

  2. Parise – Johansson – Rask10:40

    xG 0.62–0.30 (68%)attempts 9–7goals 0–1

  3. Foligno – Greenway – Eriksson Ek11:10

    xG 0.48–0.30 (62%)attempts 8–7goals 2–2

  4. Rau – Johnson – Hartman8:10

    xG 0.03–0.06 (33%)attempts 2–1goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestSuter – Dumba14:18

    xG 0.93–0.27 (78%)attempts 14–8goals 2–1

  2. Hunt – Mermis15:13

    xG 0.66–0.39 (63%)attempts 8–8goals 0–3

  3. Cole – Soucy18:15

    xG 0.62–0.64 (49%)attempts 8–18goals 1–0

St. Louis Blues

Forward lines

  1. bestClifford – Sanford – Blais10:59

    xG 0.27–0.07 (79%)attempts 4–4goals 1–1

  2. Perron – O'Reilly – Barbashev7:52

    xG 0.29–0.27 (52%)attempts 8–5goals 1–0

  3. Hoffman – Schenn – Thomas7:41

    xG 0.04–0.14 (21%)attempts 2–3goals 0–0

  4. Bozak – Kyrou – Kostin7:24

    xG 0.28–1.00 (22%)attempts 8–6goals 0–2

Defence pairs

  1. bestBortuzzo – Krug10:07

    xG 0.41–0.15 (73%)attempts 9–3goals 0–0

  2. Scandella – Santini6:03

    xG 0.17–0.17 (50%)attempts 3–5goals 1–1

  3. Santini – Mikkola10:13

    xG 0.34–0.34 (50%)attempts 9–6goals 1–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

STL 2.8 xGMIN 2.4 xG
-0.500.511.522.53P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

STLMIN

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

STL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line STL is favoured, below it MIN. Dots are goals.

Excitement 91/100 · #77 of 868 this seasonSwing 1.51 · 9 goals in reach · 3-goal lead cutComeback index 7% (winner's lowest chance)
MIN 100%5050%50STL 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +25 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, St. Louis Blues win this game 56% of the time.

STL winsMIN wins

Simulated goal difference (STL − MIN), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).