Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, May 1, 2021·Ball Arena, Denver

San Jose Sharks 3, Colorado Avalanche 4

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Colorado Avalanche win this game 79% of the time.

COL winsSJS wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
SJS01014211325
COL01522128444

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P2 4:25SJSAlexander BarabanovPPAssists: Tomas Hertl, Erik Karlsson · Snap, 0.09 xG1–0
  2. P2 13:08COLNathan MacKinnonAssists: Conor Timmins, Mikko Rantanen · Tip-in, 0.11 xG1–1
  3. P2 16:06COLAndre BurakovskyAssists: J.T. Compher · Wrist, 0.04 xG1–2
  4. P3 9:05COLPatrik NemethAssists: Cale Makar, Nathan MacKinnon · Slap, 0.01 xG1–3
  5. P3 9:55SJSLogan CoutureSHAssists: Evander Kane · Wrist, 0.19 xG2–3
  6. P3 15:34COLMikko RantanenGWGAssists: Devon Toews, Conor Timmins · Tip-in, 0.13 xG2–4
  7. P3 17:47SJSTomas HertlAssists: Brent Burns, Alexander Barabanov · Deflected, 0.12 xG3–4
Penalties (8)
  1. P1 18:44SJSRudolfs Balcers: Interference2 min
  2. P2 3:46COLGabriel Landeskog: Interference goalkeeper2 min · PPG
  3. P2 9:36SJSTimo Meier: Hooking2 min
  4. P2 12:26COLDan Renouf: Holding2 min
  5. P2 12:43SJSBrent Burns: Interference2 min
  6. P3 6:23COLGabriel Landeskog: Slashing2 min
  7. P3 9:15SJSBrent Burns: Tripping2 min
  8. P3 9:55COLKiefer Sherwood: Delaying game unsuccessful challenge2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

SJS00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0COL
46% to win54% to win
← SJS attackCOL attack →
  1. P1 20:00MacKinnon won the faceoff against Couture
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

SJSCOL
25Shots on goal44
2.1Expected goals4.0
43Shot attempts69
25Faceoffs won36
4Power plays4
8Penalty minutes8
10Hits6
19Blocked shots10
5Giveaways5
6Takeaways7

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

San Jose Sharks

Forward lines

  1. Labanc – Meier – True9:09

    xG 0.20–0.32 (38%)attempts 6–6goals 0–0

  2. Kane – Hertl – Barabanov11:17

    xG 0.21–0.46 (31%)attempts 5–14goals 0–0

  3. Couture – Balcers – Gregor10:15

    xG 0.14–0.83 (14%)attempts 3–16goals 0–2

  4. Marleau – Donato – Leonard7:32

    xG 0.19–1.04 (15%)attempts 5–11goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. Karlsson – Knyzhov12:57

    xG 0.44–0.57 (44%)attempts 10–14goals 0–0

  2. Ferraro – Knyzhov2:05

    xG 0.00–0.16 (0%)attempts 0–3goals 0–0

  3. Vlasic – Jaros11:23

    xG 0.11–0.71 (14%)attempts 6–11goals 0–0

Colorado Avalanche

Forward lines

  1. bestLandeskog – MacKinnon – Rantanen13:58

    xG 1.63–0.25 (87%)attempts 24–5goals 2–0

  2. Burakovsky – Nichushkin – Jost7:08

    xG 0.46–0.16 (74%)attempts 12–5goals 0–0

  3. Soderberg – Kadri – Donskoi9:59

    xG 0.40–0.21 (65%)attempts 7–5goals 0–0

  4. Compher – Bellemare – Sherwood5:52

    xG 0.16–0.29 (35%)attempts 5–6goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestToews – Makar11:46

    xG 0.98–0.14 (88%)attempts 19–2goals 0–0

  2. Burroughs – Renouf4:50

    xG 0.34–0.00 (100%)attempts 3–2goals 0–0

  3. Nemeth – Timmins9:24

    xG 0.60–0.34 (64%)attempts 14–7goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

COL 4.0 xGSJS 2.1 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

COLSJS

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

COL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line COL is favoured, below it SJS. Dots are goals.

Excitement 58/100 · #356 of 868 this seasonSwing 1.58 · 7 goals in reachComeback index 26% (winner's lowest chance)
SJS 100%5050%50COL 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +25 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Colorado Avalanche win this game 79% of the time.

COL winsSJS wins

Simulated goal difference (COL − SJS), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).