Skip to content
Ice Lab

Wed, Oct 13, 2021·Honda Center, Anaheim

Winnipeg Jets 1, Anaheim Ducks 4

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Anaheim Ducks win this game 58% of the time.

ANA winsWPG wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
WPG01519010134
ANA2611016422

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 6:11ANAKevin ShattenkirkAssists: Jakob Silfverberg, Isac Lundeström · Wrist, 0.05 xG0–1
  2. P1 13:20ANAMason McTavishGWGAssists: Isac Lundeström, Jakob Silfverberg · Tip-in, 0.63 xG0–2
  3. P2 3:48WPGKyle ConnorAssists: Blake Wheeler, Paul Stastny · Slap, 0.04 xG1–2
  4. P2 13:20ANAAdam HenriquePPAssists: Cam Fowler, Mason McTavish · Tip-in, 0.19 xG1–3
  5. P3 6:20ANARickard RakellPPAssists: Jamie Drysdale, Ryan Getzlaf · Tip-in, 0.22 xG1–4
Penalties (15)
  1. P1 2:11ANAHampus Lindholm: High sticking2 min
  2. P1 7:55ANAJohn Gibson: Tripping2 min
  3. P2 3:59ANAJohn Gibson: Roughing2 min
  4. P2 3:59WPGPierre-Luc Dubois: Roughing2 min
  5. P2 3:59ANAJosh Manson: Roughing2 min
  6. P2 6:20ANAMaxime Comtois: Too many men on the ice2 min
  7. P2 11:25WPGBlake Wheeler: Hooking2 min · PPG
  8. P2 15:40WPGDylan DeMelo: Kneeing2 min
  9. P2 15:40ANAKevin Shattenkirk: Roughing2 min
  10. P3 1:26ANAAdam Henrique: Tripping2 min
  11. P3 2:11WPGNeal Pionk: Holding2 min
  12. P3 5:48WPGBlake Wheeler: Holding2 min · PPG
  13. P3 9:46WPGAndrew Copp: Interference goalkeeper2 min
  14. P3 12:07ANADerek Grant: Misconduct10 min
  15. P3 15:46WPGPaul Stastny: Holding2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

WPG00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0ANA
48% to win52% to win
← WPG attackANA attack →
  1. P1 20:00Stastny won the faceoff against Getzlaf
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

WPGANA
34Shots on goal22
3.4Expected goals3.8
67Shot attempts39
28Faceoffs won25
5Power plays5
14Penalty minutes24
25Hits17
6Blocked shots19
13Giveaways11
1Takeaways8

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Winnipeg Jets

Forward lines

  1. Nash – Svechnikov – Vesalainen5:48

    xG 0.05–0.00 (100%)attempts 6–0goals 0–0

  2. Lowry – Harkins – Perfetti7:27

    xG 0.05–0.19 (20%)attempts 3–5goals 0–1

  3. Wheeler – Stastny – Connor10:23

    xG 0.08–0.32 (19%)attempts 5–5goals 1–0

  4. Copp – Ehlers – Dubois8:29

    xG 0.48–1.02 (32%)attempts 11–5goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestSchmidt – Morrissey16:56

    xG 0.67–0.38 (64%)attempts 19–8goals 1–0

  2. DeMelo – Stanley10:59

    xG 0.18–0.33 (36%)attempts 9–6goals 0–1

  3. Dillon – Pionk9:49

    xG 0.29–0.94 (23%)attempts 9–4goals 0–1

Anaheim Ducks

Forward lines

  1. bestSilfverberg – Lundeström – McTavish7:09

    xG 1.03–0.16 (87%)attempts 5–6goals 2–0

  2. Grant – Deslauriers – Groulx7:15

    xG 0.39–0.20 (66%)attempts 7–6goals 0–0

  3. Henrique – Rakell – Zegras7:03

    xG 0.08–0.03 (74%)attempts 2–4goals 0–0

  4. Getzlaf – Terry – Comtois7:37

    xG 0.21–0.31 (40%)attempts 4–12goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestFowler – Manson10:43

    xG 1.14–0.32 (78%)attempts 5–10goals 1–0

  2. Lindholm – Drysdale11:13

    xG 0.32–0.14 (69%)attempts 6–10goals 0–1

  3. Pateryn – Lindholm3:06

    xG 0.00–0.02 (6%)attempts 1–1goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

ANA 3.8 xGWPG 3.4 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

ANAWPG

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

ANA's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line ANA is favoured, below it WPG. Dots are goals.

Excitement 30/100 · #965 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.01 · 5 goals in reachComeback index 50% (winner's lowest chance)
WPG 100%5050%50ANA 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +22 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Anaheim Ducks win this game 58% of the time.

ANA winsWPG wins

Simulated goal difference (ANA − WPG), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).