Skip to content
Ice Lab

Mon, Oct 18, 2021·Wells Fargo Center, Philadelphia

Seattle Kraken 1, Philadelphia Flyers 6

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Philadelphia Flyers win this game 57% of the time.

PHI winsSEA wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
SEA081808124
PHI3162516627

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 9:18PHIClaude GirouxAssists: Travis Konecny · Slap, 0.20 xG0–1
  2. P1 12:12PHITravis KonecnyGWGAssists: Keith Yandle · Wrist, 0.17 xG0–2
  3. P1 14:36PHIDerick BrassardAssists: Justin Braun, Travis Sanheim · Slap, 0.05 xG0–3
  4. P2 7:10PHIRyan EllisAssists: Derick Brassard, Joel Farabee · Snap, 0.12 xG0–4
  5. P2 8:49PHIJustin BraunAssists: James van Riemsdyk, Oskar Lindblom · Wrist, 0.12 xG0–5
  6. P2 17:14SEACarson SoucyAssists: Jared McCann, Joonas Donskoi · Wrist, 0.17 xG1–5
  7. P3 5:25PHIJoel FarabeeAssists: Cam Atkinson, Derick Brassard · Snap, 0.17 xG1–6
Penalties (17)
  1. P1 19:44SEAAdam Larsson: Cross checking2 min
  2. P2 3:57PHINick Seeler: Interference2 min
  3. P2 8:49SEANathan Bastian: Roughing2 min
  4. P2 8:49PHIClaude Giroux: Cross checking2 min
  5. P2 12:00SEAJamie Oleksiak: Misconduct10 min
  6. P2 12:00SEAJamie Oleksiak: Fighting5 min
  7. P2 12:00PHINicolas Aube-Kubel: Interference2 min
  8. P2 12:00PHINick Seeler: Fighting5 min
  9. P2 12:00SEANathan Bastian: Misconduct10 min
  10. P2 12:00PHINate Thompson: Misconduct10 min
  11. P2 18:31PHITravis Konecny: Tripping2 min
  12. P3 1:12SEAKole Lind: Tripping2 min
  13. P3 9:11SEANathan Bastian: Misconduct10 min
  14. P3 9:11SEANathan Bastian: Fighting5 min
  15. P3 9:11PHINate Thompson: Fighting5 min
  16. P3 9:11PHINate Thompson: Misconduct10 min
  17. P3 18:20PHIMax Willman: Tripping2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

SEA00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0PHI
48% to win52% to win
← SEA attackPHI attack →
  1. P1 20:00Giroux won the faceoff against Wennberg
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

SEAPHI
24Shots on goal27
2.8Expected goals3.2
40Shot attempts45
20Faceoffs won32
4Power plays2
46Penalty minutes40
25Hits26
7Blocked shots8
5Giveaways11
9Takeaways8

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Seattle Kraken

Forward lines

  1. bestDonskoi – McCann – Appleton5:10

    xG 0.26–0.18 (60%)attempts 3–3goals 1–1

  2. Donato – Tanev – Geekie10:48

    xG 0.43–0.56 (43%)attempts 9–10goals 0–1

  3. Donskoi – McCann – Lind3:22

    xG 0.23–0.39 (37%)attempts 1–3goals 0–1

  4. Eberle – Schwartz – Wennberg11:19

    xG 0.54–0.78 (41%)attempts 11–9goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestFleury – Lauzon11:58

    xG 0.93–0.42 (69%)attempts 11–11goals 0–0

  2. Larsson – Soucy2:14

    xG 0.38–0.04 (90%)attempts 3–1goals 1–0

  3. Larsson – Lauzon2:03

    xG 0.00–0.00attempts 0–1goals 0–0

Philadelphia Flyers

Forward lines

  1. bestGiroux – Couturier – Konecny10:24

    xG 1.05–0.44 (70%)attempts 12–5goals 2–0

  2. Thompson – Aube-Kubel – Willman6:46

    xG 0.16–0.01 (92%)attempts 4–1goals 0–0

  3. Brassard – Atkinson – Farabee7:53

    xG 0.52–0.59 (47%)attempts 6–6goals 3–0

  4. van Riemsdyk – Laughton – Lindblom9:06

    xG 0.35–0.44 (45%)attempts 5–8goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestBraun – Sanheim13:40

    xG 0.64–0.49 (56%)attempts 12–8goals 2–1

  2. Sanheim – Provorov2:10

    xG 0.29–0.22 (57%)attempts 4–2goals 0–0

  3. Yandle – Seeler10:58

    xG 0.88–0.81 (52%)attempts 10–9goals 2–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

PHI 3.2 xGSEA 2.8 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

PHISEA

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

PHI's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line PHI is favoured, below it SEA. Dots are goals.

Excitement 13/100 · #1166 of 1312 this seasonSwing 0.52 · 4 goals in reachComeback index 52% (winner's lowest chance)
SEA 100%5050%50PHI 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +22 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Philadelphia Flyers win this game 57% of the time.

PHI winsSEA wins

Simulated goal difference (PHI − SEA), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).