Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Oct 23, 2021·Climate Pledge Arena, Seattle

Vancouver Canucks 4, Seattle Kraken 2

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Seattle Kraken win this game 57% of the time.

SEA winsVAN wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
VAN0917310426
SEA11201217231

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 19:56SEAVince DunnAssists: Adam Larsson, Joonas Donskoi · Wrist, 0.03 xG0–1
  2. P2 11:09VANBo HorvatAssists: Conor Garland · Wrist, 0.09 xG1–1
  3. P3 5:09SEAMark GiordanoAssists: Jared McCann, Alexander Wennberg · Wrist, 0.04 xG1–2
  4. P3 12:52VANBo HorvatPPAssists: Quinn Hughes, J.T. Miller · Wrist, 0.23 xG2–2
  5. P3 15:58VANConor GarlandGWGUnassisted · Slap, 0.07 xG3–2
  6. P3 19:00VANJustin DowlingENAssists: J.T. Miller, Brock Boeser · Wrist, 0.74 xG4–2
Penalties (6)
  1. P1 7:08SEAJared McCann: Cross checking2 min
  2. P1 16:53VANJuho Lammikko: Hooking2 min
  3. P2 4:47SEACarson Soucy: Roughing2 min
  4. P2 6:17VANQuinn Hughes: Interference2 min
  5. P2 17:56SEAJeremy Lauzon: Cross checking2 min
  6. P3 12:34SEACarson Soucy: Tripping2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

VAN00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0SEA
48% to win52% to win
← VAN attackSEA attack →
  1. P1 20:00Gourde won the faceoff against Horvat
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

VANSEA
26Shots on goal31
2.5Expected goals2.9
57Shot attempts59
36Faceoffs won23
4Power plays2
4Penalty minutes8
30Hits33
8Blocked shots14
2Giveaways8
3Takeaways6

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Vancouver Canucks

Forward lines

  1. bestChiasson – Dickinson – Lammikko3:48

    xG 0.13–0.04 (76%)attempts 6–2goals 0–0

  2. Dickinson – Highmore – Hoglander4:14

    xG 0.13–0.05 (73%)attempts 7–3goals 0–0

  3. Pearson – Horvat – Garland11:39

    xG 0.50–0.47 (52%)attempts 13–11goals 2–1

  4. Chiasson – Dowling – Lammikko3:21

    xG 0.01–0.09 (11%)attempts 1–2goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. Myers – Hughes2:46

    xG 0.05–0.05 (51%)attempts 4–3goals 0–0

  2. Burroughs – Rathbone9:03

    xG 0.19–0.19 (50%)attempts 9–8goals 0–1

  3. Myers – Ekman-Larsson15:01

    xG 0.34–0.37 (48%)attempts 14–12goals 1–0

Seattle Kraken

Forward lines

  1. bestSheahan – Appleton – Bastian7:06

    xG 0.43–0.08 (84%)attempts 9–5goals 0–0

  2. Jarnkrok – Schwartz – Gourde11:23

    xG 0.61–0.28 (68%)attempts 13–11goals 0–1

  3. Eberle – Wennberg – McCann8:42

    xG 0.42–0.44 (49%)attempts 8–11goals 1–1

  4. Donskoi – Tanev – Geekie6:46

    xG 0.04–0.16 (21%)attempts 2–8goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestGiordano – Oleksiak13:56

    xG 1.07–0.27 (80%)attempts 20–15goals 1–1

  2. Soucy – Dunn11:20

    xG 0.27–0.11 (72%)attempts 12–7goals 0–0

  3. Larsson – Lauzon15:02

    xG 0.33–0.33 (50%)attempts 8–16goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

SEA 2.9 xGVAN 2.5 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

SEAVAN

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

SEA's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line SEA is favoured, below it VAN. Dots are goals.

Excitement 67/100 · #497 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.90 · 6 goals in reachComeback index 15% (winner's lowest chance)
VAN 100%5050%50SEA 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +42 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Seattle Kraken win this game 57% of the time.

SEA winsVAN wins

Simulated goal difference (SEA − VAN), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).