Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sun, Oct 24, 2021·Xcel Energy Center, St. Paul

Nashville Predators 5, Minnesota Wild 2

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Nashville Predators win this game 80% of the time.

MIN winsNSH wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
NSH31128010529
MIN09211015235

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 3:45NSHRoman JosiPPAssists: Matt Duchene, Mikael Granlund · Wrist, 0.16 xG1–0
  2. P1 5:54NSHRyan JohansenPPAssists: Filip Forsberg, Roman Josi · Backhand, 0.19 xG2–0
  3. P1 12:25NSHRyan JohansenGWGAssists: Roman Josi, Matt Duchene · Wrist, 0.04 xG3–0
  4. P2 11:30MINNick BjugstadAssists: Jon Merrill · Wrist, 0.03 xG3–1
  5. P2 13:15NSHFilip ForsbergAssists: Roman Josi, Matt Duchene · Deflected, 0.11 xG4–1
  6. P2 18:35NSHTanner JeannotAssists: Yakov Trenin, Colton Sissons · Tip-in, 0.07 xG5–1
  7. P2 19:57MINNico SturmAssists: Brandon Duhaime · Backhand, 0.21 xG5–2
Penalties (11)
  1. P1 3:00MINDmitry Kulikov: Tripping2 min · PPG
  2. P1 5:13MINJared Spurgeon: Boarding2 min · PPG
  3. P1 6:52NSHMatt Duchene: Slashing2 min
  4. P1 12:47MINBrandon Duhaime: Tripping2 min
  5. P1 17:14MINMarcus Foligno: Tripping2 min
  6. P2 3:46NSHMikael Granlund: Hooking2 min
  7. P2 15:29MINKevin Fiala: Interference goalkeeper2 min
  8. P3 4:37NSHPhilip Tomasino: High sticking2 min
  9. P3 7:04NSHNick Cousins: Tripping2 min
  10. P3 17:08NSHColton Sissons: High sticking2 min
  11. P3 18:12MINMats Zuccarello: Interference2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

NSH00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0MIN
48% to win52% to win
← NSH attackMIN attack →
  1. P1 20:00Hartman won the faceoff against Sissons
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

NSHMIN
29Shots on goal35
4.5Expected goals2.4
49Shot attempts62
38Faceoffs won32
6Power plays5
10Penalty minutes12
7Hits9
16Blocked shots6
0Giveaways6
5Takeaways5

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Nashville Predators

Forward lines

  1. bestDuchene – Granlund – Forsberg6:55

    xG 0.92–0.02 (98%)attempts 12–3goals 1–0

  2. Sissons – Trenin – Jeannot7:53

    xG 0.59–0.16 (79%)attempts 9–8goals 1–0

  3. Cousins – Novak – Tomasino4:56

    xG 0.16–0.10 (61%)attempts 2–4goals 0–0

  4. Duchene – Johansen – Kunin3:40

    xG 0.10–0.09 (53%)attempts 3–4goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestJosi – Fabbro16:14

    xG 1.15–0.49 (70%)attempts 14–20goals 2–0

  2. Ekholm – Carrier10:06

    xG 0.64–0.39 (62%)attempts 9–13goals 0–1

  3. Borowiecki – Benning8:13

    xG 0.07–0.35 (17%)attempts 3–7goals 0–1

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. bestBjugstad – Duhaime – Sturm6:53

    xG 0.49–0.20 (71%)attempts 13–2goals 1–0

  2. Zuccarello – Hartman – Kaprizov2:04

    xG 0.29–0.27 (52%)attempts 4–2goals 0–0

  3. Foligno – Hartman – Greenway5:12

    xG 0.08–0.16 (33%)attempts 3–6goals 0–0

  4. Foligno – Greenway – Eriksson Ek2:39

    xG 0.01–0.16 (5%)attempts 2–3goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestBrodin – Dumba11:03

    xG 0.53–0.13 (80%)attempts 14–6goals 0–0

  2. Kulikov – Merrill11:08

    xG 0.60–0.56 (51%)attempts 17–6goals 2–1

  3. Goligoski – Dumba2:27

    xG 0.00–0.19 (0%)attempts 2–1goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

MIN 2.4 xGNSH 4.5 xG
012345P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

MINNSH

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

MIN's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line MIN is favoured, below it NSH. Dots are goals.

Excitement 41/100 · #815 of 1312 this seasonSwing 0.81 · 6 goals in reachComeback index 48% (winner's lowest chance)
NSH 100%5050%50MIN 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +14 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Nashville Predators win this game 80% of the time.

MIN winsNSH wins

Simulated goal difference (MIN − NSH), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).