Skip to content
Ice Lab

Wed, Nov 3, 2021·STAPLES Center, Los Angeles

St. Louis Blues 2, Los Angeles Kings 3 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Los Angeles Kings win this game 63% of the time.

LAK winsSTL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
STL010113112002235
LAK06010211083335

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P2 6:48STLBrayden SchennPPAssists: Vladimir Tarasenko, Torey Krug · Wrist, 0.35 xG1–0
  2. P3 6:16LAKArthur KaliyevAssists: Kale Clague, Alexander Edler · Snap, 0.11 xG1–1
  3. P3 12:15LAKAdrian KempeAssists: Alex Iafallo, Phillip Danault · Wrist, 0.23 xG1–2
  4. P3 19:51STLTorey KrugSHAssists: Jordan Kyrou, Vladimir Tarasenko · Wrist, 0.10 xG2–2

Shootout

  1. 1. LAK Adrian Kempe scored
  2. 2. STL David Perron scored
  3. 3. LAK Anze Kopitar stopped
  4. 4. STL Jordan Kyrou scored
  5. 5. LAK Alex Iafallo scored
  6. 6. STL Vladimir Tarasenko stopped
  7. 7. LAK Arthur Kaliyev scored
  8. 8. STL Brayden Schenn stopped
Penalties (7)
  1. P1 9:45STLTyler Bozak: Tripping2 min
  2. P2 1:22STLColton Parayko: Hooking2 min
  3. P2 6:43LAKAlexander Edler: Interference2 min · PPG
  4. P2 18:50STLBrandon Saad: Interference goalkeeper2 min
  5. P3 17:40STLDavid Perron: Hooking2 min
  6. P3 17:40LAKRasmus Kupari: Embellishment2 min
  7. P3 19:00STLRobert Thomas: Hooking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

STL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0LAK
48% to win52% to win
← STL attackLAK attack →
  1. P1 20:00Thomas won the faceoff against Danault
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

STLLAK
35Shots on goal35
3.6Expected goals4.4
60Shot attempts69
24Faceoffs won34
1Power plays4
10Penalty minutes4
22Hits18
20Blocked shots11
6Giveaways6
1Takeaways4

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

St. Louis Blues

Forward lines

  1. bestBozak – Saad – Buchnevich9:51

    xG 0.86–0.18 (83%)attempts 15–5goals 0–0

  2. Perron – Schenn – Kyrou14:02

    xG 0.48–0.49 (50%)attempts 12–12goals 0–0

  3. Neal – Joshua – Kostin8:33

    xG 0.20–0.22 (47%)attempts 8–7goals 0–1

  4. Tarasenko – Barbashev – Thomas13:47

    xG 0.62–0.66 (48%)attempts 11–14goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestFaulk – Krug10:48

    xG 0.46–0.28 (62%)attempts 11–6goals 0–0

  2. Bortuzzo – Walman9:13

    xG 0.41–0.25 (62%)attempts 9–9goals 0–0

  3. Krug – Parayko5:11

    xG 0.29–0.19 (61%)attempts 6–7goals 0–0

Los Angeles Kings

Forward lines

  1. bestDanault – Kempe – Iafallo14:04

    xG 0.87–0.41 (68%)attempts 18–10goals 1–0

  2. Grundstrom – Moore – Kupari10:14

    xG 0.46–0.32 (59%)attempts 12–8goals 0–0

  3. Lemieux – Lizotte – Kaliyev9:09

    xG 0.17–0.50 (25%)attempts 5–10goals 1–0

  4. Brown – Kopitar – Andersson10:55

    xG 0.13–1.04 (11%)attempts 4–17goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestAnderson – Bjornfot17:22

    xG 0.96–0.51 (65%)attempts 20–14goals 1–0

  2. Maatta – Roy16:04

    xG 0.30–0.86 (26%)attempts 13–16goals 0–0

  3. Edler – Clague15:24

    xG 0.37–1.04 (26%)attempts 11–20goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

LAK 4.4 xGSTL 3.6 xG
012345P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

LAKSTL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

LAK's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line LAK is favoured, below it STL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 80/100 · #308 of 1312 this seasonSwing 2.17 · 4 goals in reachComeback index 21% (winner's lowest chance)
STL 100%5050%50LAK 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +35 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Los Angeles Kings win this game 63% of the time.

LAK winsSTL wins

Simulated goal difference (LAK − STL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).