Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Nov 6, 2021·PPG Paints Arena, Pittsburgh

Minnesota Wild 5, Pittsburgh Penguins 4 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 61% of the time.

PIT winsMIN wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
MIN111113212043540
PIT210116110032439

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 9:44MINKirill KaprizovAssists: Alex Goligoski, Frederick Gaudreau · Backhand, 0.17 xG1–0
  2. P1 16:33PITKasperi KapanenAssists: Jason Zucker, Evan Rodrigues · Wrist, 0.14 xG1–1
  3. P1 19:04PITKasperi KapanenAssists: Evan Rodrigues, Jason Zucker · Slap, 0.09 xG1–2
  4. P2 13:34PITJake GuentzelAssists: Bryan Rust, Mike Matheson · Snap, 0.11 xG1–3
  5. P2 16:57MINJoel Eriksson EkAssists: Jared Spurgeon, Jonas Brodin · Deflected, 0.09 xG2–3
  6. P3 8:45PITKasperi KapanenAssists: Bryan Rust, Kris Letang · Snap, 0.06 xG2–4
  7. P3 16:41MINJared SpurgeonAssists: Frederick Gaudreau · Wrist, 0.02 xG3–4
  8. P3 19:57MINRyan HartmanAssists: Mathew Dumba, Adam Beckman · Wrist, 0.07 xG4–4

Shootout

  1. 1. PIT Jake Guentzel scored
  2. 2. MIN Frederick Gaudreau stopped
  3. 3. PIT Kris Letang stopped
  4. 4. MIN Kevin Fiala scored
  5. 5. PIT Bryan Rust scored
  6. 6. MIN Kirill Kaprizov scored
  7. 7. PIT Kasperi Kapanen stopped
  8. 8. MIN Nick Bjugstad scored
Penalties (4)
  1. P1 1:19MINMarcus Foligno: High sticking2 min
  2. P1 12:55PITDrew O'Connor: Tripping2 min
  3. P2 4:31PITTeddy Blueger: Hooking2 min
  4. P3 6:43MINConnor Dewar: Tripping2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

MIN00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0PIT
48% to win52% to win
← MIN attackPIT attack →
  1. P1 20:00Blueger won the faceoff against Gaudreau
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

MINPIT
40Shots on goal39
3.1Expected goals3.8
72Shot attempts62
34Faceoffs won33
2Power plays2
4Penalty minutes4
28Hits39
13Blocked shots21
6Giveaways8
6Takeaways13

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. bestBjugstad – Duhaime – Sturm8:46

    xG 0.42–0.31 (58%)attempts 12–5goals 0–0

  2. Hartman – Gaudreau – Kaprizov11:20

    xG 0.37–0.28 (57%)attempts 10–11goals 1–0

  3. Foligno – Fiala – Eriksson Ek9:43

    xG 0.43–0.51 (46%)attempts 11–6goals 1–1

  4. Rau – Dewar – Beckman6:35

    xG 0.08–0.32 (20%)attempts 3–8goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestSpurgeon – Brodin2:28

    xG 0.36–0.05 (87%)attempts 8–1goals 1–0

  2. Kulikov – Merrill12:25

    xG 0.63–0.47 (58%)attempts 17–9goals 0–1

  3. Goligoski – Spurgeon14:30

    xG 0.60–0.95 (39%)attempts 13–17goals 1–3

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. bestBoyle – Heinen – O'Connor6:42

    xG 0.52–0.02 (97%)attempts 8–3goals 0–0

  2. Zucker – Kapanen – Rodrigues10:56

    xG 0.48–0.46 (51%)attempts 10–9goals 2–0

  3. Blueger – McGinn – Aston-Reese13:31

    xG 0.52–0.58 (47%)attempts 9–15goals 0–0

  4. Carter – Rust – Guentzel11:25

    xG 0.70–0.78 (47%)attempts 13–17goals 1–2

Defence pairs

  1. bestLetang – Matheson18:40

    xG 1.09–0.63 (63%)attempts 19–15goals 2–1

  2. Friedman – Riikola10:13

    xG 0.77–0.58 (57%)attempts 11–12goals 0–0

  3. Marino – Joseph15:05

    xG 0.55–0.66 (46%)attempts 14–17goals 1–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

PIT 3.8 xGMIN 3.1 xG
01234P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

PITMIN

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

PIT's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line PIT is favoured, below it MIN. Dots are goals.

Excitement 94/100 · #88 of 1312 this seasonSwing 2.38 · 8 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 1% (winner's lowest chance)
MIN 100%5050%50PIT 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +45 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 61% of the time.

PIT winsMIN wins

Simulated goal difference (PIT − MIN), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).