Sun, Nov 7, 2021·Honda Center, Anaheim
St. Louis Blues 1, Anaheim Ducks 4
Expected result
Based on shot quality alone, Anaheim Ducks win this game 58% of the time.
By period
Goals and shots on goal in each period.
| Team | P1 | P2 | P3 | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| STL | 18 | 012 | 015 | 135 |
| ANA | 09 | 16 | 312 | 427 |
Goals, with shots on goal in grey.
Scoring
Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.
- P1 0:13STLBrandon SaadAssists: David Perron, Colton Parayko · Snap, 0.12 xG1–0
- P2 8:23ANASam CarrickAssists: Derek Grant, Bo Groulx · Tip-in, 0.08 xG1–1
- P3 2:46ANATroy TerryPPGWGAssists: Sonny Milano, Cam Fowler · Tip-in, 0.16 xG1–2
- P3 8:31ANASam SteelAssists: Hampus Lindholm, Nicolas Deslauriers · Tip-in, 0.09 xG1–3
- P3 19:12ANABo GroulxENUnassisted · Snap, 0.77 xG1–4
Penalties (4)
- P1 14:39STLIvan Barbashev: Slashing2 min
- P2 19:02ANARyan Getzlaf: Cross checking2 min
- P3 2:18STLRobert Thomas: Hooking2 min · PPG
- P3 19:12STLDavid Perron: Misconduct10 min
Replay
Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.
20:00
P1
- P1 20:00Getzlaf won the faceoff against O'Reilly
- Goal
- Shot
- Miss
- Block
- Hit
- Takeaway
- Giveaway
- Faceoff
- Penalty
The numbers
Team totals, side by side.
Line combinations that worked
Model-basedEach team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.
St. Louis Blues
Forward lines
- bestTarasenko – Kyrou – Thomas12:50
xG 0.81–0.44 (65%)attempts 15–10goals 0–0
- Buchnevich – Barbashev – Kostin10:13
xG 0.69–0.54 (56%)attempts 18–7goals 0–1
- Perron – O'Reilly – Saad12:26
xG 0.43–0.54 (44%)attempts 9–10goals 1–0
- Neal – Bozak – Neighbours7:46
xG 0.06–0.24 (21%)attempts 3–6goals 0–0
Defence pairs
- bestFaulk – Walman12:50
xG 0.78–0.46 (63%)attempts 14–7goals 0–0
- Parayko – Rosen2:10
xG 0.13–0.00 (100%)attempts 5–0goals 0–0
- Bortuzzo – Rosen8:58
xG 0.36–0.33 (53%)attempts 9–6goals 0–0
Anaheim Ducks
Forward lines
- bestGrant – Carrick – Groulx8:39
xG 0.32–0.19 (62%)attempts 8–7goals 1–0
- Deslauriers – Steel – Comtois9:32
xG 0.44–0.46 (49%)attempts 7–10goals 1–0
- Milano – Lundeström – McTavish13:33
xG 0.44–0.59 (43%)attempts 9–14goals 0–0
- Getzlaf – Henrique – Terry12:00
xG 0.14–0.55 (21%)attempts 7–11goals 0–1
Defence pairs
- bestShattenkirk – Benoit11:16
xG 0.62–0.35 (64%)attempts 10–14goals 0–0
- Shattenkirk – Lindholm2:30
xG 0.08–0.07 (52%)attempts 3–1goals 0–0
- Fowler – Manson16:22
xG 0.56–0.71 (44%)attempts 11–15goals 1–1
How the game flowed
Model-basedChance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.
Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.
Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute
Win probability
Model-basedHow each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.
ANA's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line ANA is favoured, below it STL. Dots are goals.
Did the better team win?
Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.
Based on shot quality alone, Anaheim Ducks win this game 58% of the time.
Simulated goal difference (ANA − STL), 10,000 replays
The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).