Skip to content
Ice Lab

Wed, Nov 24, 2021·Ball Arena, Denver

Anaheim Ducks 2, Colorado Avalanche 5

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Colorado Avalanche win this game 76% of the time.

COL winsANA wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
ANA1805113226
COL11121728536

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 4:58ANASonny MilanoPPAssists: Rickard Rakell, Jamie Drysdale · Wrist, 0.44 xG1–0
  2. P1 19:06COLCale MakarAssists: Nazem Kadri, Gabriel Landeskog · Snap, 0.02 xG1–1
  3. P2 2:49COLAlex NewhookAssists: Devon Toews, Tyson Jost · Tip-in, 0.07 xG1–2
  4. P2 10:25COLNicolas Aube-KubelGWGAssists: Jayson Megna, Ryan Murray · Wrist, 0.06 xG1–3
  5. P3 0:57COLNazem KadriPPAssists: Mikko Rantanen, Gabriel Landeskog · Tip-in, 0.18 xG1–4
  6. P3 15:22COLValeri NichushkinAssists: Andre Burakovsky, Erik Johnson · Wrist, 0.07 xG1–5
  7. P3 16:07ANASonny MilanoPPAssists: Jamie Drysdale, Trevor Zegras · Tip-in, 0.11 xG2–5
Penalties (12)
  1. P1 3:18ANANicolas Deslauriers: Fighting5 min
  2. P1 3:18COLKurtis MacDermid: Fighting5 min · PPG
  3. P1 4:42COLMikko Rantanen: Interference2 min
  4. P1 6:18ANAJamie Drysdale: Interference2 min
  5. P1 13:15ANAJamie Drysdale: Hooking2 min
  6. P2 0:20ANAHampus Lindholm: Tripping2 min
  7. P2 7:51ANAJakob Silfverberg: Tripping2 min
  8. P2 14:36COLAndre Burakovsky: Hooking2 min
  9. P2 19:34ANACam Fowler: Tripping2 min · PPG
  10. P2 19:41ANARyan Getzlaf: Slashing2 min
  11. P3 4:04ANAJosh Manson: Slashing2 min
  12. P3 15:49COLGabriel Landeskog: Interference goalkeeper2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

ANA00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0COL
48% to win52% to win
← ANA attackCOL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Lundeström won the faceoff against Newhook
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

ANACOL
26Shots on goal36
2.0Expected goals3.5
47Shot attempts63
30Faceoffs won39
3Power plays7
19Penalty minutes11
14Hits18
17Blocked shots10
4Giveaways8
7Takeaways6

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Anaheim Ducks

Forward lines

  1. bestGetzlaf – Milano – Terry3:27

    xG 0.12–0.00 (100%)attempts 5–0goals 0–0

  2. Silfverberg – Rakell – Zegras5:58

    xG 0.27–0.16 (63%)attempts 7–3goals 0–1

  3. Grant – Deslauriers – Groulx2:42

    xG 0.05–0.00 (100%)attempts 1–0goals 0–0

  4. Rakell – Milano – Zegras5:29

    xG 0.13–0.10 (57%)attempts 6–5goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. Shattenkirk – Benoit11:49

    xG 0.21–0.23 (47%)attempts 13–10goals 0–2

  2. Lindholm – Drysdale15:47

    xG 0.17–0.56 (23%)attempts 8–18goals 0–1

  3. Fowler – Manson12:35

    xG 0.34–0.75 (31%)attempts 9–9goals 0–0

Colorado Avalanche

Forward lines

  1. bestKadri – Burakovsky – Nichushkin7:48

    xG 0.61–0.03 (96%)attempts 10–4goals 0–0

  2. Landeskog – Rantanen – O'Connor8:08

    xG 0.28–0.09 (77%)attempts 6–2goals 0–0

  3. Helm – Megna – Aube-Kubel3:13

    xG 0.10–0.13 (44%)attempts 4–6goals 1–0

  4. Aube-Kubel – Jost – Newhook6:35

    xG 0.04–0.14 (23%)attempts 5–5goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestToews – Girard3:17

    xG 0.37–0.12 (76%)attempts 3–2goals 1–0

  2. Toews – Makar12:19

    xG 0.31–0.18 (63%)attempts 11–4goals 0–0

  3. Johnson – Girard10:31

    xG 0.44–0.42 (51%)attempts 9–12goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

COL 3.5 xGANA 2.0 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

COLANA

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

COL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line COL is favoured, below it ANA. Dots are goals.

Excitement 43/100 · #800 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.04 · 6 goals in reachComeback index 35% (winner's lowest chance)
ANA 100%5050%50COL 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +22 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Colorado Avalanche win this game 76% of the time.

COL winsANA wins

Simulated goal difference (COL − ANA), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).