Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Dec 2, 2021·Xcel Energy Center, St. Paul

New Jersey Devils 2, Minnesota Wild 5

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 63% of the time.

MIN winsNJD wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
NJD010210011231
MIN213213112538

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 8:49MINKirill KaprizovAssists: Ryan Hartman, Kaapo Kahkonen · Wrist, 0.08 xG0–1
  2. P1 11:09MINRem PitlickAssists: Victor Rask · Wrist, 0.09 xG0–2
  3. P2 2:28MINKirill KaprizovGWGAssists: Mats Zuccarello, Alex Goligoski · Wrist, 0.07 xG0–3
  4. P2 2:52NJDRyan GravesAssists: Dougie Hamilton, Michael McLeod · Slap, 0.00 xG1–3
  5. P2 7:40NJDTomas TatarAssists: Dougie Hamilton · Snap, 0.21 xG2–3
  6. P2 10:27MINDmitry KulikovAssists: Ryan Hartman, Kirill Kaprizov · Wrist, 0.26 xG2–4
  7. P3 16:05MINRyan HartmanAssists: Alex Goligoski · Snap, 0.06 xG2–5
Penalties (9)
  1. P1 3:37NJDJonas Siegenthaler: High sticking2 min
  2. P1 16:12MINNico Sturm: Holding2 min
  3. P2 12:33MINRem Pitlick: Tripping2 min
  4. P2 18:50NJDPavel Zacha: Hooking2 min
  5. P3 2:53MINBrandon Duhaime: High sticking2 min
  6. P3 6:16NJDAndreas Johnsson: Roughing2 min
  7. P3 6:16MINRyan Hartman: Roughing2 min
  8. P3 6:16NJDAndreas Johnsson: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  9. P3 8:12NJDDawson Mercer: Tripping2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

NJD00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0MIN
48% to win52% to win
← NJD attackMIN attack →
  1. P1 20:00Bjugstad won the faceoff against Mercer
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

NJDMIN
31Shots on goal38
2.9Expected goals3.7
55Shot attempts66
28Faceoffs won34
3Power plays4
10Penalty minutes8
10Hits14
13Blocked shots15
5Giveaways5
4Takeaways8

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

New Jersey Devils

Forward lines

  1. bestTatar – Vesey – Sharangovich6:30

    xG 0.79–0.16 (83%)attempts 11–8goals 1–1

  2. Johnsson – Bratt – Mercer11:00

    xG 1.10–1.06 (51%)attempts 14–22goals 0–2

  3. Geertsen – Bastian – McLeod4:26

    xG 0.02–0.21 (7%)attempts 3–4goals 1–1

  4. Zacha – Hischier – Hughes11:26

    xG 0.16–0.72 (18%)attempts 5–15goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. Hamilton – Graves8:53

    xG 0.47–0.48 (49%)attempts 11–11goals 2–3

  2. Hamilton – Smith4:47

    xG 0.06–0.20 (24%)attempts 3–2goals 0–0

  3. Subban – Siegenthaler2:16

    xG 0.06–0.25 (18%)attempts 5–2goals 0–1

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. bestZuccarello – Hartman – Kaprizov9:25

    xG 1.30–0.52 (72%)attempts 20–7goals 4–0

  2. Rask – Fiala – Pitlick8:54

    xG 0.58–0.10 (85%)attempts 12–5goals 1–1

  3. Bjugstad – Duhaime – Sturm8:15

    xG 0.09–0.61 (13%)attempts 7–11goals 0–1

  4. Foligno – Greenway – Eriksson Ek8:26

    xG 0.21–0.83 (20%)attempts 9–7goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestBrodin – Dumba15:10

    xG 0.98–0.64 (60%)attempts 20–13goals 0–1

  2. Goligoski – Merrill13:10

    xG 0.91–0.91 (50%)attempts 18–16goals 4–1

  3. Benn – Kulikov12:55

    xG 0.51–0.69 (43%)attempts 13–12goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

MIN 3.7 xGNJD 2.9 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

MINNJD

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

MIN's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line MIN is favoured, below it NJD. Dots are goals.

Excitement 69/100 · #483 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.02 · 7 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 51% (winner's lowest chance)
NJD 100%5050%50MIN 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +22 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 63% of the time.

MIN winsNJD wins

Simulated goal difference (MIN − NJD), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).