Fri, Dec 3, 2021·Madison Square Garden, New York
San Jose Sharks 0, New York Rangers 1
Expected result
Based on shot quality alone, New York Rangers win this game 58% of the time.
By period
Goals and shots on goal in each period.
| Team | P1 | P2 | P3 | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SJS | 010 | 07 | 011 | 028 |
| NYR | 110 | 06 | 011 | 127 |
Goals, with shots on goal in grey.
Scoring
Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.
- P1 6:03NYRRyan StromePPGWGAssists: Adam Fox, Mika Zibanejad · Slap, 0.11 xG0–1
Penalties (5)
- P1 5:15SJSNoah Gregor: Interference goalkeeper2 min · PPG
- P1 17:39NYRPatrik Nemeth: Tripping2 min
- P2 10:08SJSMarc-Edouard Vlasic: Tripping2 min
- P3 2:14SJSErik Karlsson: Tripping2 min
- P3 10:44NYRK'Andre Miller: Tripping2 min
Replay
Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.
20:00
P1
- P1 20:00Zibanejad won the faceoff against Couture
- Goal
- Shot
- Miss
- Block
- Hit
- Takeaway
- Giveaway
- Faceoff
- Penalty
The numbers
Team totals, side by side.
Line combinations that worked
Model-basedEach team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.
San Jose Sharks
Forward lines
- bestBonino – Nieto – Gregor11:25
xG 0.63–0.50 (56%)attempts 15–10goals 0–0
- Hertl – Labanc – Barabanov2:05
xG 0.00–0.00attempts 1–0goals 0–0
- Labanc – Pederson – Weatherby6:36
xG 0.20–0.41 (32%)attempts 7–7goals 0–0
- Hertl – Balcers – Barabanov11:16
xG 0.31–0.63 (33%)attempts 5–13goals 0–0
Defence pairs
- bestKarlsson – Middleton18:45
xG 0.95–0.79 (55%)attempts 16–18goals 0–0
- Burns – Karlsson3:22
xG 0.11–0.17 (40%)attempts 7–3goals 0–0
- Vlasic – Meloche7:57
xG 0.30–0.42 (42%)attempts 7–7goals 0–0
New York Rangers
Forward lines
- bestGauthier – Chytil – Lafrenière11:15
xG 0.99–0.40 (71%)attempts 16–10goals 0–0
- Strome – Hunt – Panarin12:53
xG 0.85–0.32 (73%)attempts 15–8goals 0–0
- Kreider – Zibanejad – Kakko9:14
xG 0.19–0.12 (62%)attempts 8–5goals 0–0
- Reaves – Goodrow – Rooney9:59
xG 0.09–0.58 (14%)attempts 4–12goals 0–0
Defence pairs
- bestFox – Lindgren17:07
xG 1.13–0.32 (78%)attempts 23–8goals 0–0
- Nemeth – Lundkvist9:40
xG 0.69–0.61 (53%)attempts 10–12goals 0–0
- Nemeth – Miller2:01
xG 0.00–0.00attempts 2–0goals 0–0
How the game flowed
Model-basedChance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.
Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.
Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute
Win probability
Model-basedHow each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.
NYR's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line NYR is favoured, below it SJS. Dots are goals.
Did the better team win?
Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.
Based on shot quality alone, New York Rangers win this game 58% of the time.
Simulated goal difference (NYR − SJS), 10,000 replays
The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).