Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Dec 4, 2021·Rogers Arena, Vancouver

Pittsburgh Penguins 4, Vancouver Canucks 1

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 84% of the time.

VAN winsPIT wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
PIT012322110444
VAN0715011123

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P2 2:19PITJake GuentzelAssists: Brian Dumoulin, Kris Letang · Slap, 0.11 xG1–0
  2. P2 6:18VANVasily PodkolzinAssists: Oliver Ekman-Larsson, Brock Boeser · Deflected, 0.07 xG1–1
  3. P2 17:13PITJake GuentzelPPGWGAssists: Sidney Crosby, Jeff Carter · Slap, 0.11 xG2–1
  4. P2 18:23PITJake GuentzelPPAssists: Sidney Crosby, Kris Letang · Wrist, 0.08 xG3–1
  5. P3 11:15PITSidney CrosbyAssists: Kris Letang, Jake Guentzel · Deflected, 0.09 xG4–1
Penalties (12)
  1. P1 15:54VANBrock Boeser: Slashing2 min
  2. P1 16:17PITKris Letang: Tripping2 min
  3. P2 4:16PITMarcus Pettersson: Cross checking2 min
  4. P2 7:58VANJ.T. Miller: Tripping2 min
  5. P2 11:11VANJ.T. Miller: Tripping2 min
  6. P2 16:14VANTyler Myers: Closing hand on puck2 min · PPG
  7. P2 16:45VANTyler Motte: Cross checking2 min · PPG
  8. P2 17:05VANTucker Poolman: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  9. P2 18:23VANConor Garland: Misconduct10 min
  10. P3 17:05PITJohn Marino: Interference2 min
  11. P3 19:58VANOliver Ekman-Larsson: Roughing2 min
  12. P3 19:58PITJohn Marino: Roughing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

PIT00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0VAN
48% to win52% to win
← PIT attackVAN attack →
  1. P1 20:00Crosby won the faceoff against Horvat
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

PITVAN
44Shots on goal23
3.9Expected goals1.7
77Shot attempts50
32Faceoffs won24
6Power plays3
8Penalty minutes24
16Hits18
15Blocked shots21
2Giveaways3
4Takeaways7

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. bestCrosby – Guentzel – Rodrigues13:16

    xG 0.99–0.21 (83%)attempts 23–6goals 2–0

  2. Blueger – McGinn – Kapanen9:02

    xG 0.76–0.37 (67%)attempts 12–12goals 0–0

  3. Simon – Aston-Reese – O'Connor6:25

    xG 0.11–0.05 (70%)attempts 5–5goals 0–0

  4. Carter – Zucker – Heinen10:09

    xG 0.23–0.30 (43%)attempts 10–8goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestLetang – Dumoulin12:48

    xG 0.89–0.21 (81%)attempts 17–13goals 2–0

  2. Matheson – Marino2:31

    xG 0.30–0.07 (81%)attempts 6–1goals 0–0

  3. Matheson – Ruhwedel9:33

    xG 0.25–0.08 (76%)attempts 11–4goals 0–0

Vancouver Canucks

Forward lines

  1. bestMiller – Boeser – Pettersson5:21

    xG 0.48–0.00 (100%)attempts 8–1goals 0–0

  2. Horvat – Garland – Podkolzin2:29

    xG 0.00–0.09 (0%)attempts 0–3goals 0–0

  3. Dowling – Pettersson – Hoglander4:21

    xG 0.03–0.15 (16%)attempts 3–4goals 0–0

  4. Pearson – Horvat – Garland5:38

    xG 0.11–0.24 (32%)attempts 6–11goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. Myers – Hughes3:46

    xG 0.10–0.05 (65%)attempts 6–1goals 0–0

  2. Poolman – Hughes2:17

    xG 0.01–0.00 (100%)attempts 2–2goals 0–0

  3. Schenn – Hughes11:09

    xG 0.44–0.58 (43%)attempts 12–10goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

VAN 1.7 xGPIT 3.9 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

VANPIT

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

VAN's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line VAN is favoured, below it PIT. Dots are goals.

Excitement 36/100 · #885 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.22 · 5 goals in reachComeback index 45% (winner's lowest chance)
PIT 100%5050%50VAN 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +25 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 84% of the time.

VAN winsPIT wins

Simulated goal difference (VAN − PIT), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).