Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Dec 9, 2021·SAP Center at San Jose, San Jose

Minnesota Wild 5, San Jose Sharks 2

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 63% of the time.

SJS winsMIN wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
MIN1102829527
SJS0907219235

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 6:22MINKevin FialaAssists: Jon Merrill, Brandon Duhaime · Slap, 0.15 xG1–0
  2. P2 7:04MINJoel Eriksson EkPPAssists: Mats Zuccarello, Kirill Kaprizov · Tip-in, 0.11 xG2–0
  3. P2 15:20MINJordan GreenwayPPGWGAssists: Kevin Fiala, Alex Goligoski · Wrist, 0.11 xG3–0
  4. P3 3:29SJSJonathan DahlenAssists: Erik Karlsson, Tomas Hertl · Tip-in, 0.12 xG3–1
  5. P3 13:26SJSTomas HertlPPAssists: Jonathan Dahlen, Logan Couture · Wrist, 0.35 xG3–2
  6. P3 18:12MINJordan GreenwayENAssists: Ryan Hartman, Joel Eriksson Ek · Backhand, 0.79 xG4–2
  7. P3 18:44MINKirill KaprizovENUnassisted · Wrist, 0.75 xG5–2
Penalties (6)
  1. P2 1:47MINJon Merrill: Tripping2 min
  2. P2 6:49SJSJake Middleton: Tripping2 min · PPG
  3. P2 13:33SJSJake Middleton: Holding2 min · PPG
  4. P3 0:34SJSJake Middleton: Hooking2 min
  5. P3 9:02MINJordie Benn: Holding the stick2 min
  6. P3 13:17MINJonas Brodin: Hooking2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

MIN00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0SJS
48% to win52% to win
← MIN attackSJS attack →
  1. P1 20:00Bonino won the faceoff against Eriksson Ek
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

MINSJS
27Shots on goal35
3.9Expected goals3.1
54Shot attempts56
21Faceoffs won28
3Power plays3
6Penalty minutes6
19Hits31
10Blocked shots14
3Giveaways8
11Takeaways7

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. bestBjugstad – Shaw – Sturm9:04

    xG 0.54–0.47 (54%)attempts 8–6goals 0–1

  2. Zuccarello – Hartman – Kaprizov10:42

    xG 0.39–0.38 (51%)attempts 8–11goals 0–0

  3. Foligno – Greenway – Eriksson Ek9:57

    xG 0.29–0.45 (39%)attempts 5–10goals 0–0

  4. Rask – Fiala – Duhaime11:04

    xG 0.44–0.66 (40%)attempts 15–8goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. Spurgeon – Brodin13:41

    xG 0.52–0.53 (50%)attempts 13–14goals 0–0

  2. Benn – Kulikov14:18

    xG 0.52–0.53 (50%)attempts 14–12goals 0–1

  3. Goligoski – Merrill16:27

    xG 0.64–1.16 (35%)attempts 14–18goals 1–0

San Jose Sharks

Forward lines

  1. bestLabanc – Gadjovich – Weatherby9:09

    xG 0.68–0.35 (66%)attempts 7–6goals 0–0

  2. Hertl – Meier – Dahlen3:32

    xG 0.53–0.24 (69%)attempts 8–2goals 1–0

  3. Couture – Meier – Dahlen8:25

    xG 0.50–0.26 (65%)attempts 15–7goals 0–0

  4. Cogliano – Bonino – Nieto7:13

    xG 0.02–0.15 (10%)attempts 2–6goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestBurns – Ferraro15:00

    xG 0.88–0.46 (66%)attempts 17–16goals 0–1

  2. Vlasic – Meloche11:54

    xG 0.40–0.15 (73%)attempts 9–5goals 0–0

  3. Karlsson – Middleton15:43

    xG 0.78–0.89 (47%)attempts 14–17goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

SJS 3.1 xGMIN 3.9 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

SJSMIN

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

SJS's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line SJS is favoured, below it MIN. Dots are goals.

Excitement 68/100 · #487 of 1312 this seasonSwing 0.91 · 7 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 48% (winner's lowest chance)
MIN 100%5050%50SJS 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +14 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 63% of the time.

SJS winsMIN wins

Simulated goal difference (SJS − MIN), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).