Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Dec 11, 2021·Scotiabank Arena, Toronto

Chicago Blackhawks 4, Toronto Maple Leafs 5

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Chicago Blackhawks win this game 60% of the time.

TOR winsCHI wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
CHI11211429435
TOR31113112526

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 1:53CHIJonathan ToewsAssists: Reese Johnson, Connor Murphy · Wrist, 0.13 xG1–0
  2. P1 2:54TORJohn TavaresPPAssists: Auston Matthews, William Nylander · Wrist, 0.07 xG1–1
  3. P1 9:14TORWilliam NylanderAssists: John Tavares, Timothy Liljegren · Wrist, 0.10 xG1–2
  4. P1 14:32TORAuston MatthewsPPAssists: Ondrej Kase, William Nylander · Wrist, 0.31 xG1–3
  5. P2 3:25TORPierre EngvallAssists: Kyle Clifford, Alex Steeves · Wrist, 0.06 xG1–4
  6. P2 16:31CHIConnor MurphyAssists: Brandon Hagel · Wrist, 0.02 xG2–4
  7. P3 1:47CHIDominik KubalikAssists: Philipp Kurashev, Jake McCabe · Wrist, 0.09 xG3–4
  8. P3 10:42CHIJake McCabeAssists: Riley Stillman, Ryan Carpenter · Wrist, 0.01 xG4–4
  9. P3 18:40TORDavid KampfGWGAssists: Morgan Rielly, TJ Brodie · Backhand, 0.07 xG4–5
Penalties (6)
  1. P1 2:24CHIReese Johnson: Tripping2 min · PPG
  2. P1 4:38TORKristians Rubins: Interference2 min
  3. P1 11:21CHIRiley Stillman: Interference2 min
  4. P1 14:04CHIRiley Stillman: Tripping2 min · PPG
  5. P1 17:00TOROndrej Kase: High sticking2 min
  6. P2 14:21TORMichael Bunting: Interference2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

CHI00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0TOR
48% to win52% to win
← CHI attackTOR attack →
  1. P1 20:00Strome won the faceoff against Matthews
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

CHITOR
35Shots on goal26
2.5Expected goals1.9
47Shot attempts43
26Faceoffs won28
3Power plays3
6Penalty minutes6
24Hits18
12Blocked shots4
7Giveaways17
11Takeaways13

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Chicago Blackhawks

Forward lines

  1. bestToews – Hagel – Johnson5:54

    xG 0.50–0.19 (72%)attempts 8–5goals 1–1

  2. Kubalik – Strome – Kurashev5:06

    xG 0.25–0.11 (70%)attempts 5–2goals 0–0

  3. Kubalik – Kurashev – Dach6:04

    xG 0.15–0.02 (90%)attempts 3–4goals 1–0

  4. Kane – Strome – DeBrincat9:22

    xG 0.50–0.44 (53%)attempts 8–11goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestMcCabe – Jones2:13

    xG 0.11–0.00 (100%)attempts 1–0goals 0–0

  2. de Haan – Jones6:09

    xG 0.27–0.16 (63%)attempts 6–3goals 0–1

  3. Murphy – McCabe6:17

    xG 0.24–0.19 (55%)attempts 3–5goals 0–1

Toronto Maple Leafs

Forward lines

  1. bestBunting – Kase – Matthews12:00

    xG 0.54–0.48 (53%)attempts 10–8goals 0–0

  2. Tavares – Kerfoot – Nylander10:52

    xG 0.31–0.34 (47%)attempts 13–6goals 1–1

  3. Clifford – Engvall – Steeves6:06

    xG 0.14–0.23 (38%)attempts 4–5goals 1–1

  4. Simmonds – Ritchie – Kampf8:18

    xG 0.11–0.24 (30%)attempts 5–7goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestBrodie – Holl2:21

    xG 0.21–0.02 (91%)attempts 4–1goals 0–0

  2. Brodie – Rielly14:38

    xG 0.49–0.38 (57%)attempts 12–10goals 1–1

  3. Rielly – Liljegren2:00

    xG 0.16–0.12 (56%)attempts 5–1goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

TOR 1.9 xGCHI 2.5 xG
00.511.522.5P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

TORCHI

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

TOR's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line TOR is favoured, below it CHI. Dots are goals.

Excitement 93/100 · #100 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.83 · 9 goals in reach · 3-goal lead cutComeback index 42% (winner's lowest chance)
CHI 100%5050%50TOR 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +43 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Chicago Blackhawks win this game 60% of the time.

TOR winsCHI wins

Simulated goal difference (TOR − CHI), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).