Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Dec 18, 2021·Wells Fargo Center, Philadelphia

Ottawa Senators 3, Philadelphia Flyers 4 (OT)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Philadelphia Flyers win this game 63% of the time.

PHI winsOTT wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTTotal
OTT0721411000331
PHI2140161612438

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 4:19PHIClaude GirouxAssists: Oskar Lindblom · Snap, 0.24 xG0–1
  2. P1 7:32PHIOskar LindblomAssists: Travis Konecny, Ivan Provorov · Slap, 0.07 xG0–2
  3. P2 2:09OTTTim StützleAssists: Alex Formenton, Connor Brown · Wrist, 0.06 xG1–2
  4. P2 3:22OTTAlex FormentonSHUnassisted · Wrist, 0.22 xG2–2
  5. P3 13:43OTTArtem ZubAssists: Dylan Gambrell, Zachary Sanford · Slap, 0.02 xG3–2
  6. P3 14:35PHIJoel FarabeeAssists: Sean Couturier, Travis Konecny · Wrist, 0.01 xG3–3
  7. OT 1:35PHITravis SanheimGWGAssists: Cam Atkinson · Tip-in, 0.19 xG3–4
Penalties (7)
  1. P1 13:40PHIRasmus Ristolainen: Roughing2 min
  2. P1 13:40OTTAustin Watson: Roughing2 min
  3. P2 2:42OTTDrake Batherson: High sticking2 min
  4. P2 6:59PHIJustin Braun: Hooking2 min
  5. P2 10:38OTTDillon Heatherington: Fighting5 min
  6. P2 10:38PHIZack MacEwen: Fighting5 min
  7. P2 16:45OTTJacob Bernard-Docker: Holding2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

OTT00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0PHI
48% to win52% to win
← OTT attackPHI attack →
  1. P1 20:00Norris won the faceoff against Couturier
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

OTTPHI
31Shots on goal38
2.4Expected goals3.1
54Shot attempts65
26Faceoffs won30
1Power plays2
11Penalty minutes9
39Hits24
16Blocked shots13
11Giveaways13
7Takeaways4

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Ottawa Senators

Forward lines

  1. Watson – Sanford – Gambrell4:49

    xG 0.03–0.00 (100%)attempts 4–1goals 1–0

  2. Ennis – Tierney – Paul6:03

    xG 0.20–0.19 (51%)attempts 5–5goals 0–0

  3. Watson – Paul – Gambrell4:23

    xG 0.05–0.16 (23%)attempts 1–6goals 0–0

  4. Brown – Formenton – Stützle11:30

    xG 0.32–0.48 (40%)attempts 13–12goals 1–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestChabot – Bernard-Docker16:18

    xG 0.74–0.31 (70%)attempts 16–14goals 0–1

  2. Heatherington – Mete3:00

    xG 0.11–0.00 (100%)attempts 5–1goals 0–0

  3. Holden – Zub13:40

    xG 0.32–0.32 (50%)attempts 11–12goals 1–0

Philadelphia Flyers

Forward lines

  1. bestGiroux – Atkinson – Lindblom11:54

    xG 0.66–0.34 (66%)attempts 17–15goals 1–0

  2. Couturier – Konecny – Farabee13:59

    xG 0.50–0.20 (71%)attempts 17–7goals 1–0

  3. Brown – MacEwen – Cates4:59

    xG 0.10–0.17 (36%)attempts 2–4goals 0–1

  4. van Riemsdyk – Hayes – Laughton8:53

    xG 0.04–0.39 (8%)attempts 3–6goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. Braun – Provorov18:09

    xG 0.51–0.47 (52%)attempts 17–13goals 1–0

  2. Ristolainen – Sanheim18:37

    xG 0.61–0.64 (49%)attempts 23–20goals 1–2

  3. Yandle – Connauton10:13

    xG 0.36–0.39 (48%)attempts 6–9goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

PHI 3.1 xGOTT 2.4 xG
0123P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

PHIOTT

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

PHI's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line PHI is favoured, below it OTT. Dots are goals.

Excitement 88/100 · #184 of 1312 this seasonSwing 2.18 · 7 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 12% (winner's lowest chance)
OTT 100%5050%50PHI 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +40 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Philadelphia Flyers win this game 63% of the time.

PHI winsOTT wins

Simulated goal difference (PHI − OTT), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).