Sat, Feb 19, 2022·Canadian Tire Centre, Ottawa
Boston Bruins 3, Ottawa Senators 2 (OT)
Expected result
Based on shot quality alone, Boston Bruins win this game 51% of the time.
By period
Goals and shots on goal in each period.
| Team | P1 | P2 | P3 | OT | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BOS | 011 | 212 | 08 | 12 | 333 |
| OTT | 09 | 111 | 110 | 01 | 231 |
Goals, with shots on goal in grey.
Scoring
Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.
- P2 2:37BOSJake DeBruskAssists: Jack Studnicka · Backhand, 0.08 xG1–0
- P2 6:45OTTTim StützleAssists: Austin Watson, Artem Zub · Wrist, 0.21 xG1–1
- P2 18:54BOSBrandon CarloAssists: Charlie Coyle, Mike Reilly · Backhand, 0.07 xG2–1
- P3 16:06OTTNick HoldenAssists: Connor Brown, Nick Paul · Wrist, 0.08 xG2–2
- OT 2:42BOSDavid PastrnakGWGAssists: Taylor Hall, Mike Reilly · Slap, 0.07 xG3–2
Penalties (8)
- P2 11:49OTTParker Kelly: Roughing2 min
- P2 11:49BOSConnor Clifton: Roughing2 min
- P2 11:49BOSConnor Clifton: Roughing2 min
- P2 11:49BOSNick Foligno: Roughing2 min
- P2 11:49OTTAustin Watson: Roughing2 min
- P2 15:59BOSNick Foligno: Interference2 min
- P2 15:59OTTVictor Mete: Holding2 min
- P3 4:50BOSCraig Smith: High sticking2 min
Replay
Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.
20:00
P1
- P1 20:00Coyle won the faceoff against Tierney
- Goal
- Shot
- Miss
- Block
- Hit
- Takeaway
- Giveaway
- Faceoff
- Penalty
The numbers
Team totals, side by side.
Line combinations that worked
Model-basedEach team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.
Boston Bruins
Forward lines
- bestSmith – Coyle – Frederic10:18
xG 0.50–0.09 (84%)attempts 9–2goals 0–0
- Bergeron – Hall – Pastrnak13:22
xG 0.90–0.63 (59%)attempts 17–12goals 0–1
- Lazar – Nosek – DeBrusk12:17
xG 0.56–0.62 (48%)attempts 11–15goals 0–1
- Foligno – Haula – Studnicka8:54
xG 0.18–0.43 (30%)attempts 6–9goals 0–0
Defence pairs
- bestGrzelcyk – Carlo15:04
xG 0.87–0.26 (77%)attempts 10–11goals 0–0
- Reilly – McAvoy11:05
xG 0.75–0.23 (77%)attempts 17–8goals 1–0
- Grzelcyk – McAvoy2:44
xG 0.16–0.06 (72%)attempts 5–3goals 0–0
Ottawa Senators
Forward lines
- bestWatson – Sanford – Gambrell2:00
xG 0.12–0.02 (87%)attempts 2–1goals 0–0
- Watson – Gambrell – Kelly5:43
xG 0.02–0.02 (45%)attempts 2–3goals 0–0
- Brown – Paul – Tkachuk13:34
xG 0.74–0.84 (47%)attempts 12–15goals 1–0
- Ennis – Tierney – Sanford10:37
xG 0.27–0.44 (38%)attempts 7–9goals 0–0
Defence pairs
- bestHolden – Zaitsev14:59
xG 0.69–0.60 (53%)attempts 15–13goals 1–1
- Brown – Mete12:33
xG 0.43–0.35 (55%)attempts 11–11goals 0–1
- Brannstrom – Zub19:12
xG 0.66–1.10 (37%)attempts 15–18goals 1–0
How the game flowed
Model-basedChance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.
Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.
Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute
Win probability
Model-basedHow each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.
OTT's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line OTT is favoured, below it BOS. Dots are goals.
Did the better team win?
Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.
Based on shot quality alone, Boston Bruins win this game 51% of the time.
Simulated goal difference (OTT − BOS), 10,000 replays
The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).