Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Jan 1, 2022·Bridgestone Arena, Nashville

Chicago Blackhawks 1, Nashville Predators 6

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Chicago Blackhawks win this game 57% of the time.

NSH winsCHI wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
CHI015111012138
NSH3721216625

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 1:02NSHFilip ForsbergAssists: Matt Duchene, Mattias Ekholm · Wrist, 0.04 xG0–1
  2. P1 5:53NSHRyan JohansenGWGAssists: Filip Forsberg, Mattias Ekholm · Backhand, 0.14 xG0–2
  3. P1 19:13NSHNick CousinsPPAssists: Mattias Ekholm, Philip Tomasino · Tip-in, 0.19 xG0–3
  4. P2 0:28NSHTanner JeannotAssists: Colton Sissons, Yakov Trenin · Wrist, 0.17 xG0–4
  5. P2 5:34NSHRoman JosiPPAssists: Ryan Johansen, Matt Duchene · Slap, 0.06 xG0–5
  6. P2 17:25CHIPhilipp KurashevAssists: Calvin de Haan, Henrik Borgstrom · Wrist, 0.03 xG1–5
  7. P3 0:53NSHTanner JeannotAssists: Matt Benning, Yakov Trenin · Deflected, 0.09 xG1–6
Penalties (9)
  1. P1 4:44CHISeth Jones: Slashing2 min
  2. P1 4:44NSHMichael McCarron: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  3. P1 9:28NSHRoman Josi: Holding2 min
  4. P1 13:19NSHPhilippe Myers: Interference2 min
  5. P1 17:27CHIDylan Strome: Tripping2 min · PPG
  6. P2 3:23CHIBrandon Hagel: High sticking2 min
  7. P2 3:54CHIKirby Dach: Holding2 min · PPG
  8. P3 3:13NSHMichael McCarron: Hooking2 min
  9. P3 16:32NSHPhilippe Myers: Hooking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

CHI00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0NSH
48% to win52% to win
← CHI attackNSH attack →
  1. P1 20:00Dach won the faceoff against Sissons
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

CHINSH
38Shots on goal25
3.1Expected goals2.6
71Shot attempts52
30Faceoffs won29
4Power plays3
8Penalty minutes10
6Hits18
13Blocked shots13
6Giveaways6
4Takeaways4

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Chicago Blackhawks

Forward lines

  1. bestKhaira – Carpenter – Strome2:15

    xG 0.24–0.02 (92%)attempts 5–1goals 0–0

  2. Kubalik – Kurashev – Dach2:51

    xG 0.21–0.00 (100%)attempts 4–0goals 0–0

  3. Strome – DeBrincat – Dach3:19

    xG 0.13–0.00 (100%)attempts 3–1goals 0–0

  4. Kubalik – Borgstrom – Kurashev5:16

    xG 0.18–0.06 (74%)attempts 5–2goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestde Haan – Jones10:04

    xG 0.42–0.17 (71%)attempts 13–7goals 1–1

  2. Gustafsson – Stillman8:51

    xG 0.37–0.27 (58%)attempts 7–8goals 0–0

  3. McCabe – Jones2:04

    xG 0.05–0.02 (69%)attempts 3–1goals 0–0

Nashville Predators

Forward lines

  1. Duchene – Granlund – Forsberg13:17

    xG 0.39–0.44 (47%)attempts 10–14goals 1–1

  2. Cousins – McCarron – Tomasino8:39

    xG 0.14–0.25 (37%)attempts 8–7goals 0–0

  3. Sissons – Trenin – Jeannot9:48

    xG 0.46–0.60 (43%)attempts 4–13goals 1–0

  4. Johansen – Kunin – Tolvanen9:40

    xG 0.08–0.25 (26%)attempts 5–10goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestEkholm – Myers2:41

    xG 0.23–0.06 (80%)attempts 5–3goals 1–0

  2. Borowiecki – Benning2:19

    xG 0.00–0.00attempts 0–1goals 0–0

  3. Josi – Myers2:01

    xG 0.00–0.03 (0%)attempts 1–2goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

NSH 2.6 xGCHI 3.1 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

NSHCHI

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

NSH's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line NSH is favoured, below it CHI. Dots are goals.

Excitement 13/100 · #1150 of 1312 this seasonSwing 0.57 · 4 goals in reachComeback index 52% (winner's lowest chance)
CHI 100%5050%50NSH 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +22 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Chicago Blackhawks win this game 57% of the time.

NSH winsCHI wins

Simulated goal difference (NSH − CHI), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).