Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Jan 6, 2022·TD Garden, Boston

Minnesota Wild 3, Boston Bruins 2

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 56% of the time.

BOS winsMIN wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
MIN21411006330
BOS110111017238

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 6:35BOSTaylor HallPPAssists: Mike Reilly, Erik Haula · Snap, 0.10 xG0–1
  2. P1 15:25MINKirill KaprizovPPAssists: Mats Zuccarello, Kevin Fiala · Snap, 0.12 xG1–1
  3. P1 16:48MINNico SturmPPAssists: Jonas Brodin, Connor Dewar · Slap, 0.28 xG2–1
  4. P2 12:26MINMatt BoldyGWGAssists: Marcus Foligno, Jonas Brodin · Wrist, 0.05 xG3–1
  5. P2 15:35BOSBrad MarchandPPAssists: Patrice Bergeron, Matt Grzelcyk · Slap, 0.11 xG3–2
Penalties (19)
  1. P1 0:32BOSMike Reilly: Tripping2 min
  2. P1 4:36MINKevin Fiala: Slashing2 min · PPG
  3. P1 4:36MINMathew Dumba: Hooking2 min
  4. P1 6:11BOSPatrice Bergeron: Tripping2 min
  5. P1 14:49BOSBrad Marchand: Holding2 min · PPG
  6. P1 14:49BOSBrandon Carlo: Interference2 min · PPG
  7. P1 18:12MINKirill Kaprizov: Roughing2 min
  8. P1 18:12BOSAnton Blidh: Roughing2 min
  9. P1 18:12BOSTrent Frederic: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  10. P2 4:27MINAlex Goligoski: Interference2 min
  11. P2 10:12BOSTrent Frederic: Boarding2 min
  12. P2 10:12BOSTrent Frederic: Fighting5 min
  13. P2 10:12MINDmitry Kulikov: Fighting5 min
  14. P2 13:03BOSPatrice Bergeron: Interference2 min
  15. P2 15:10MINMathew Dumba: Interference2 min · PPG
  16. P3 1:12BOSTrent Frederic: High sticking2 min
  17. P3 1:12BOSTrent Frederic: Fighting5 min
  18. P3 1:12MINMarcus Foligno: Fighting5 min
  19. P3 1:24MINMarco Rossi: Tripping2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

MIN00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0BOS
48% to win52% to win
← MIN attackBOS attack →
  1. P1 20:00Hartman won the faceoff against Bergeron
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

MINBOS
30Shots on goal38
3.0Expected goals2.6
49Shot attempts55
27Faceoffs won40
8Power plays5
22Penalty minutes28
23Hits33
10Blocked shots9
5Giveaways7
7Takeaways9

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. bestGaudreau – Dewar – Sturm2:37

    xG 0.16–0.05 (77%)attempts 2–1goals 0–0

  2. Pitlick – Dewar – Sturm4:23

    xG 0.10–0.00 (100%)attempts 2–1goals 0–0

  3. Foligno – Fiala – Rossi2:17

    xG 0.00–0.05 (0%)attempts 0–1goals 0–0

  4. Foligno – Boldy – Rossi4:16

    xG 0.09–0.14 (39%)attempts 2–5goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestBenn – Kulikov5:47

    xG 0.14–0.07 (68%)attempts 7–4goals 0–0

  2. Brodin – Dumba15:27

    xG 0.29–0.32 (47%)attempts 7–12goals 0–0

  3. Goligoski – Merrill7:22

    xG 0.17–0.30 (36%)attempts 5–7goals 0–0

Boston Bruins

Forward lines

  1. bestFoligno – Coyle – Steen6:51

    xG 0.49–0.09 (85%)attempts 8–5goals 0–0

  2. Haula – Hall – Pastrnak6:37

    xG 0.14–0.04 (76%)attempts 6–3goals 0–0

  3. Blidh – Lazar – Frederic2:59

    xG 0.10–0.00 (100%)attempts 2–0goals 0–0

  4. Bergeron – Marchand – Smith7:44

    xG 0.21–0.17 (56%)attempts 10–6goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestMoore – Grzelcyk6:27

    xG 0.44–0.09 (83%)attempts 11–5goals 0–0

  2. Reilly – Grzelcyk3:49

    xG 0.33–0.02 (94%)attempts 6–1goals 0–0

  3. Forbort – Clifton7:04

    xG 0.18–0.03 (85%)attempts 6–2goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

BOS 2.6 xGMIN 3.0 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

BOSMIN

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

BOS's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line BOS is favoured, below it MIN. Dots are goals.

Excitement 50/100 · #734 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.61 · 5 goals in reachComeback index 26% (winner's lowest chance)
MIN 100%5050%50BOS 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +22 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 56% of the time.

BOS winsMIN wins

Simulated goal difference (BOS − MIN), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).