Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Jan 6, 2022·Wells Fargo Center, Philadelphia

Pittsburgh Penguins 6, Philadelphia Flyers 2

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 80% of the time.

PHI winsPIT wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
PIT3150839632
PHI091615220

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 12:21PITBryan RustPPAssists: Kris Letang, Sidney Crosby · Wrist, 0.10 xG1–0
  2. P1 14:55PITBryan RustAssists: Evan Rodrigues, Kris Letang · Wrist, 0.11 xG2–0
  3. P1 16:16PITJake GuentzelGWGAssists: Kris Letang, Brian Dumoulin · Wrist, 0.76 xG3–0
  4. P2 8:10PHICam AtkinsonAssists: Joel Farabee, Scott Laughton · Slap, 0.08 xG3–1
  5. P3 8:50PITEvan RodriguesAssists: Kasperi Kapanen · Wrist, 0.27 xG4–1
  6. P3 10:20PITJake GuentzelAssists: Sidney Crosby, Bryan Rust · Snap, 0.25 xG5–1
  7. P3 11:51PITBrian BoyleSHAssists: John Marino · Snap, 0.16 xG6–1
  8. P3 13:00PHIOskar LindblomAssists: Morgan Frost, Zack MacEwen · Snap, 0.20 xG6–2
Penalties (9)
  1. P1 4:48PITTeddy Blueger: Cross checking2 min
  2. P1 11:25PHIMorgan Frost: Holding the stick2 min · PPG
  3. P1 14:13PHIScott Laughton: Roughing2 min
  4. P1 14:13PITTristan Jarry: Slashing2 min
  5. P2 4:24PITKasper Bjorkqvist: Interference2 min
  6. P3 2:12PITJake Guentzel: Slashing2 min
  7. P3 2:12PHIScott Laughton: Roughing2 min
  8. P3 10:46PITMarcus Pettersson: Cross checking2 min
  9. P3 11:51PHIKevin Hayes: Misconduct10 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

PIT00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0PHI
48% to win52% to win
← PIT attackPHI attack →
  1. P1 20:00Laughton won the faceoff against Crosby
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

PITPHI
32Shots on goal20
3.9Expected goals2.1
56Shot attempts49
28Faceoffs won24
1Power plays3
10Penalty minutes16
17Hits30
15Blocked shots12
6Giveaways3
12Takeaways4

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. bestKapanen – Heinen – Rodrigues11:22

    xG 0.89–0.05 (95%)attempts 13–4goals 1–0

  2. Boyle – Simon – Bjorkqvist7:16

    xG 0.38–0.15 (71%)attempts 8–3goals 0–0

  3. Crosby – Rust – Guentzel11:59

    xG 0.88–0.79 (53%)attempts 14–15goals 1–1

  4. Blueger – McGinn – Aston-Reese10:40

    xG 0.08–0.26 (24%)attempts 5–8goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestPettersson – Marino13:13

    xG 0.46–0.32 (59%)attempts 12–8goals 0–0

  2. Matheson – Ruhwedel12:17

    xG 0.51–0.44 (54%)attempts 12–9goals 0–0

  3. Letang – Dumoulin14:07

    xG 0.64–0.65 (50%)attempts 14–16goals 0–0

Philadelphia Flyers

Forward lines

  1. bestBrown – Willman – Bunnaman5:08

    xG 0.16–0.03 (84%)attempts 3–4goals 0–0

  2. Brassard – Hayes – MacEwen5:20

    xG 0.29–0.26 (53%)attempts 6–6goals 0–0

  3. Brown – Lindblom – MacEwen2:50

    xG 0.00–0.00attempts 2–0goals 0–0

  4. Hayes – Willman – Bunnaman3:18

    xG 0.00–0.02 (0%)attempts 0–3goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestRistolainen – Zamula16:23

    xG 0.84–0.61 (58%)attempts 17–10goals 1–1

  2. Braun – York15:21

    xG 0.24–0.53 (31%)attempts 11–13goals 0–0

  3. Yandle – Connauton13:22

    xG 0.64–1.59 (29%)attempts 11–17goals 0–2

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

PHI 2.1 xGPIT 3.9 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

PHIPIT

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

PHI's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line PHI is favoured, below it PIT. Dots are goals.

Excitement 41/100 · #821 of 1312 this seasonSwing 0.78 · 6 goals in reachComeback index 46% (winner's lowest chance)
PIT 100%5050%50PHI 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +16 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 80% of the time.

PHI winsPIT wins

Simulated goal difference (PHI − PIT), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).